ChiefsPlanet
Page 55 of 123 « First 54551525354 55 5657585965105 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Eric Berry ‘a bit surprised’ on lack of extension progress (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=300780)

RunKC 07-18-2016 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12318896)
Looks like Dorsey is agreeing with what Dane said. The Chiefs felt Berry wasn't worth the $12 million price point.
Can see why Dorsey would think this. 48th in INT's last year, 10 overall in his career.
Passing league and Berry's position as a box safety is just not valuable like it used to be.

Still think this would have a big affect on the locker room though. Don't blame Dorsey for thinking this.

DaneMcCloud 07-18-2016 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12321868)
You are way too emotionally invested in this stuff.
LMAO

Stryker 07-19-2016 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12321826)
Why would anyone think he would take a paycut?

Players rarely take paycuts with their existing team. They try the market and take less money someplace new if they have to. Just they way it works.

Last year we were arguing about this same shit and i said then that Berry wouldn't take the paycut and that a SS isn't worth 10+ m per and everyone freaked out.

I don't give a single shit whether the Chiefs label him at FS, he still plays like a SS. Berry has one more year to become Ed Reed or we let him walk. That stupid Pos Crennel should never work in the league again for putting a safety drafted in the top 5 at SS. Stupid ****er.
Outstanding!! I love this statement and it is sooooo true :clap: No, he does not have to become a ballhawk, but for the amount of money he wants...he better damn well be.

Marcellus 07-19-2016 06:58 PM
I will take a healthy Berry on a contract year looking to prove something and wreck shit this season.

Lets see what you got.

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2016 08:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12323790)
I will take a healthy Berry on a contract year looking to prove something and wreck shit this season.

Lets see what you got.
Yeah, the Chiefs should just start giving out $10.8 million dollar Franchise contracts for guys to "Prove it".

If you're not reeruned, I'd like to see some proof.

Meatloaf 07-19-2016 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12324005)
Yeah, the Chiefs should just start giving out $10.8 million dollar Franchise contracts for guys to "Prove it".

If you're not reeruned, I'd like to see some proof.
Dane, I'm thinking what he was getting at was that although Berry is good, hopefully a contract year will stimulate him into being GREAT. I'm skeptical just because I don't think he's a great coverage guy, but I guess he could surprise.....but probably not.

Marcellus 07-19-2016 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12324005)
Yeah, the Chiefs should just start giving out $10.8 million dollar Franchise contracts for guys to "Prove it".

If you're not reeruned, I'd like to see some proof.
:rolleyes:

What is your solution to this? Drop the tag and let him walk?

Are you implying players on contract years dont show some extra motivation much of the time?

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2016 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12324069)
:rolleyes:

What is your solution to this? Drop the tag and let him walk?

Are you implying players on contract years dont show some extra motivation much of the time?
Rescind the tag, take the $10.8 and roll it over into to 2017.

FWIW, I have to give props to DJ for posting the solution first,

RunKC 07-19-2016 09:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12324084)
Rescind the tag, take the $10.8 and roll it over into to 2017.

FWIW, I have to give props to DJ for posting the solution first,
And have Parker, a rookie, Fleming, Brown and Sorenson?

That is scary.

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2016 09:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12324168)
And have Parker, a rookie, Fleming, Brown and Sorenson?

That is scary.
It was also "scary" in 2014 with Parker and less talented scrubs, yet they did fine.

O.city 07-19-2016 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12324175)
It was also "scary" in 2014 with Parker and less talented scrubs, yet they did fine.
2-3 finish and missed the playoffs?

DaneMcCloud 07-19-2016 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12324215)
2-3 finish and missed the playoffs?
:facepalm:

Are you blaming the defense?

O.city 07-19-2016 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12324220)
:facepalm:

Are you blaming the defense?
Are you saying they wouldn't be better with berry?

O.city 07-19-2016 09:49 PM
Iirc, the defense did have 1 pants shitting against the broncos but that was a team effort all around.

The "not giving up a 300 yard passer" moniker was great but a little misleading. They had a near all time sack artist going off and they played alot of soft zone, bend don't break defense that didn't create alot of turnovers.

That can work but I like the aggressive style more

RunKC 07-19-2016 09:55 PM
The Chiefs got massive amounts of pressure on the QB in the 2 wins without Berry in 2014. At least 4 sacks in both wins.

I wouldn't consider the Chiefs performance without Berry as them being "fine".

The defense could struggle with With all 3 OLB's having ?'s this year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 AM.
Page 55 of 123 « First 54551525354 55 5657585965105 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.