Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9765046)

Wrong again.

I have always been a less offensive version of Dane as a poster. Dane crosses line after line after line and it's fine...it's Dane. It's ChiefsPlanet.

If you're trying to act like Dane should get a free pass for saying the most awful thing ever said on this board then fine. But don't pretend he has always been innocent and I always begged to be banned.

Because that's ridiculous. Dane has been way more controversial than me over the years. It's not close.

You're dumb. And wrong. Mostly dumb though.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9765045)

So I doubt this is the most drama-filled thread in the history of the board. Unless we find out that the real source of the tension between Phobia and Hootie is that they made eye-contact while making Clay into a Chinese finger trap.

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9765040)

I guess it would be - if I was in my 20s and alone. Take a bow, loser.

By the way, I'm sort of confused here - are you trying to white knight somebody, or is it just your special time of the month?

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9765046)

Wrong again.

I have always been a less offensive version of Dane as a poster. Dane crosses line after line after line and it's fine...it's Dane. It's ChiefsPlanet.

If you're trying to act like Dane should get a free pass for saying the most awful thing ever said on this board then fine. But don't pretend he has always been innocent and I always begged to be banned.

Because that's ridiculous. Dane has been way more controversial than me over the years. It's not close.

You're dumb. And wrong. Mostly dumb though.

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9765048)

It's a harmless debate Phil.

Why do you refuse to truce? I'm making a reasonable request. I've enjoyed this thread, and so has everyone else apparently.

You're ruining it for me. I'd like a truce. That's my reasonable request. You leave me alone, I'll pretend you no longer exist.

Why do you refuse to agree? That's as reasonable as it gets.

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9765049)

So, you don't understand that rule.

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 9765052)

You are bad at reading intentions and tone.

Just to be clear...because I know you are not a smart guy..

I have been laughing at you. Watching you yearn for the days of old when this place had a few people that liked you. It meshes well with your "I thought we were friends" tantrum you once threw over someone unfriending you on Facebook.

No worries though. I might be in the same boat if friends on a message board were the only friends I could get as well. Tough break man.

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9765016)

There you are... still commenting on things you don't understand and weren't there to know about. But if you post about it enough, maybe that will make it true.

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9765063)

I understand the rule and the need for it. I don't understand why it should be used as a way of winning an argument when people ask perfectly reasonable questions.

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9765038)

Think of it as one guy pisses in your yard day after day. Eventually the homeowner gets pissed off and punches the pisser(or in your case calls the cops). Another guy comes by that's never pissed in your yard before and you let it slide, but pisser #1 that you punched is pissed off because you didn't punch pisser #2 because he never did it before. You and Clay piss in yards day after day and you actually take pride in it where Nzoner never pissed in anyone's yard before, but had one time offense of pissing apologized for it and moved on. You don't see the difference?

Things just aren't done in a vacuum and this isn't a court of law although I think things aren't done in a vacuum in there either. I'd defer to DJ on this one, but I would think the guy that looks like a douche gets a stiffer sentence then the guy that looks like a nice guy that made a bad choice.

It's just you man. You like to enjoy all the positives of your personality, but don't want to accept that there are also draw backs to it as well. People like you for being a douche and people are going to dislike you for being a douche and they aren't going to cut you any slack. That's life.

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9765073)

I guess I missed the question(s) which GoChiefs asked.

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9765079)

I was alluding to the "thin ice" comment directed at Hootie.

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9765061)

I refuse to agree because I'm no longer in 8th grade. Truce? Really? You want to get along with me then do it. I'm not in a position where I have to seek out truces with morons. It's not that hard to get along with me. Just do the opposite of whatever you've been doing the past month. Do what you did the first couple months when you registered a new account. I knew the day you signed up for a new account. If I'm really that anti-Hootie, why are you still here? You can't really follow a simple logic-picture.

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9765079)

I was alluding to the "thin ice" comment directed at Hootie.

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9765100)

I wasn't trying to hide.

And fine. But I hardly ever seek you out...yet you constantly chime in and tell everyone how useless and how much of a lost cause I am.

Whatever it was I did to you in the past I apologize. If I knew such a ridiculous grudge would have developed I surely wouldn't have hit 'submit reply.'