ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Major Update on Tyreek Hill [old thread, don't freak out]

He has zero obligation to follow anything he directed to be written. He can bend the rules as he sees fit because the Collective Bargaining Agreement gave him the power to do so.

He's gone against his own policy many times in the past. Don't assume he's going to follow that fully. It's a kangaroo court basically.

This is patently false. JFC where do you guys come up with this shit? The policy was written into the last CBA, the WRITTEN POLICY.

Goodell can decide what the punishment is if evidence of a violation is found but there still has to be evidence.

FAX	04-24-2019 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14226056)

Romper this piece of shit thread

You and your "Romper This! Romper That!" ...

What is it with you and rompering, anyway?

FAX

CasselGotPeedOn

04-24-2019 03:37 PM

Can you imagine being as dense as Marcellus the reerun? LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO

Marcellus

04-24-2019 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 14226089)

Can you imagine being as dense as Marcellus the reerun? LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO

Dense because I can read and don't simply make shit up?

FAX	04-24-2019 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TravelingChiefs (Post 14226073)

The only way and I repeat the ONLY way Hill gets a suspension is if he refuses to cooperate with the NFL. Hill is not getting suspended because Brooke Pryor was looking for a scoop.

That's good news, at least ...

For if that were the case, we'd all be in deep, deep trouble.

Goodall as Brooke's little bitch is a frightening concept.

FAX

siberian khatru

04-24-2019 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14226088)

You and your "Romper This! Romper That!" ...

What is it with you and rompering, anyway?

FAX

Dude’s so fashion forward, he wears man-rompers

VAGOMO 4 LIFE!

04-24-2019 03:40 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No charges against Kansas City Chiefs’ Tyreek Hill: JoCo DA <a href="https://t.co/Mc4AUcwWLQ">https://t.co/Mc4AUcwWLQ</a></p>— Brooke Pryor (@bepryor) <a href="https://twitter.com/bepryor/status/1121148106345730049?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

BryanBusby

04-24-2019 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14226085)

They did it to Ezekiel Elliott with no real proof. Why are you clinging to that shit?

Pooch

04-24-2019 03:41 PM

If Hill did this he is a horrible person!! And I cannot like him as a person or player!!

But what bothers me about the Hunt situation is that we cut him just to let another team sign him!! We got nothing for doing the right thing and the Browns got an amazing player that will be more motivated than ever for a cheap contract!! Now everyone expects us to cut Hill!!

Hoover

04-24-2019 03:41 PM

Side Bar: The WORST thing the Player Association ever did was allow the Commissioner to be judge and jury on all forms of punishment. It's nuts.

RobertWeathers

04-24-2019 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 14226047)

Get outta here Boston trash

Red Dawg

04-24-2019 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14226035)

False. Read the policy. It doesn't say anywhere in the policy that Goodell can do whatever he wants with no evidence.

http://static.nfl.com/static/content...0000444539.pdf

He can. I read the CBA and there's a portion that gives him the authortiy if he thinks a player makes the league look bad. That of course is just a simple way of putting it.

srvy	04-24-2019 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 14225984)

If the Chiefs already have removed Hill from their future plans, as some reports had said, due to his history and his ongoing legal issues, they'd be looking at having this year left with him, and maybe next year under the tag.

If he's going to be exempt for a while and suspended after that, he may not have many games in a Chiefs uniform left regardless. Cutting him might (save them the issue of tagging him) and PR relief, at the cost of only a handful of games of Tyreek Hill, in their view. And his ongoing legal issues severely diminish his trade value next offseason.

Who in the **** would ever want to play for an organization who wont stand behind a employee who in the eyes of the law is guilty of nothing. Someone may be but who is it?

Mecca

04-24-2019 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14226098)

And there it is, she gonna run with "the DA says he's guilty"

This whole thing is dumb there are no charges so move on.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Page 58 of 163

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page