ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Surtain to Arizona? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=114490)

shaneo69 04-20-2005 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81
Why Odell Thurman? Is a backup MLB really a priority? Or would you move Bell outside and put a rookie like Thurman in the middle? After the Kawika Mitchell fiasco, i'm not too sure about having a young guy in the middle calling the shots.

I'd move Bell outside. I think Thurman is a lot more ready to play in the NFL than Kawika was. But that's JMO.

KCTitus 04-20-2005 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter
Plan on sitting in front of the TV with your mouth open when the Chiefs announce their draft pick then have to look up on the internet who he is...count on it.

Outside the top 15-20 picks, I do that with all the teams not just KC. It seems like too much work.

Mr. Laz 04-20-2005 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolmeZz
Ronde Barber would be as effective as McCleon in Gunther's scheme. He's a cover 2 corner.

except for gunther doesn't want to play cover 2 ... he wants to play man-on-man press coverage.

milkman 04-20-2005 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
except for gunther doesn't want to play cover 2 ... he wants to play man-on-man press coverage.

I'm pretty sure that was his point.

tomahawk kid 04-20-2005 09:34 AM

I am literally going to puke if we lose Surtain to the freaking Cardinals.

Carl and his 1,000 lb ego sure do make it hard to be a fan of this team sometimes.

Hopefully, this is simply a smokescreen by Miami to use as leverage.

Mr. Laz 04-20-2005 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideWinder
I'm pretty sure that was his point.

oooo .... dam, i just read that post all wrong ROFL

htismaqe 04-20-2005 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee
And at long last mackway finds himself nearing where I was when Rolle and Hartwell bolted. Welcome bud. :thumb:
We are sooooo fooked, because CP and DV made the double faux pas of telling the world that they don't have faith in our current personnel, then NOT REPLACING THEM.

Well, I look at it this way.

With Rolle there were definite reasons not to sign the guy to a HUGE deal -- he spent almost half of his time on the injury report list, he played for some bad defenses, he was undersized, etc. Whether legit or not, well that's debatable. But there WERE flaws that one could reason wouldn't make him worth $15M.

With Hartwell there's certainly less of those. Perhaps the biggest one was that he wanted to be paid like the #1 LB in the league. Again, there was at least one reason that any reasonable person could say "Well, we didn't get him, but it's ok."

With Surtain, there are none of those reasons. NONE. There is absolutely ZERO reason the guy shouldn't be in a Chiefs uniform RIGHT ****ING NOW. He's a Pro Bowler who has played for the league's top pass defense -- and no, not last year's top pass defense, the top pass defense SINCE HE GOT THERE.

Wallcrawler 04-20-2005 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rufusmaqe
With Surtain, there are none of those reasons. NONE. There is absolutely ZERO reason the guy shouldn't be in a Chiefs uniform RIGHT ****ING NOW. He's a Pro Bowler who has played for the league's top pass defense -- and no, not last year's top pass defense, the top pass defense SINCE HE GOT THERE.




Exactly.

I cannot fathom why the Chiefs are dicking around in the manner that they are in regard to this guy. I cant think of a single reason to justify not landing this guy on the defense. He's worth the 2nd rounder, and he's worth the money.

If they are actually serious about improving the secondary, they have a very, very strange way of showing it.

TEX 04-20-2005 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Stinger
Exactly.

I cannot fathom why the Chiefs are dicking around in the manner that they are in regard to this guy. I cant think of a single reason to justify not landing this guy on the defense. He's worth the 2nd rounder, and he's worth the money.

If they are actually serious about improving the secondary, they have a very, very strange way of showing it.

Beacuse unfortunately for the CHIEFS, TY LAW is still out there. I can't wait for the "One ARROWHEAD Drive SPIN JOB"... ROFL :shake:

TEX 04-20-2005 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rufusmaqe
Well, I look at it this way.

With Rolle there were definite reasons not to sign the guy to a HUGE deal -- he spent almost half of his time on the injury report list, he played for some bad defenses, he was undersized, etc. Whether legit or not, well that's debatable. But there WERE flaws that one could reason wouldn't make him worth $15M.

With Hartwell there's certainly less of those. Perhaps the biggest one was that he wanted to be paid like the #1 LB in the league. Again, there was at least one reason that any reasonable person could say "Well, we didn't get him, but it's ok."

With Surtain, there are none of those reasons. NONE. There is absolutely ZERO reason the guy shouldn't be in a Chiefs uniform RIGHT ****ING NOW. He's a Pro Bowler who has played for the league's top pass defense -- and no, not last year's top pass defense, the top pass defense SINCE HE GOT THERE.


Just wait for all the "bad knees" crap to spew from C.P. and company after Zona signs Surtain... :shake:

TEX 04-20-2005 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav
I would rather have both Carlos Rogers and Surtain, than a 2nd rounder.

EXACTLY! :clap:

Then sign a FA LB after June 1. with BOTH CB's we'd be for a LONG time. Man, this deal is there for the taking and the CHIEFS are going to blow it. :shake:

keg in kc 04-21-2005 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rufusmaqe
With Surtain, there are none of those reasons. NONE. There is absolutely ZERO reason the guy shouldn't be in a Chiefs uniform RIGHT ****ING NOW. He's a Pro Bowler who has played for the league's top pass defense -- and no, not last year's top pass defense, the top pass defense SINCE HE GOT THERE.

Let's not put the cart ahead of the horse. If we don't get Surtain there will be plenty of reason to complain, but negotiations are still going on.

CoMoChief 04-21-2005 01:29 AM

Has anyone noticed how everytime CP or DV talk about the defense they say that they want the defense to be just "middle of the pack". What kind of goal is that, to be just average. Carl knew when he brought DV in that we were gonna spend all our money on offense. He tried to nickle and dime the defensive side of the ball and thought that we would score enough to overcome a bad defense. In some ways we do that, but come playoff time everyone knows that defense wins. I just think that we need to set a better goal rather than that of "middle of the pack" status. We need to set a goal more like, "get back to mid 90's defense" status.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.