crazycoffey |
05-21-2007 09:28 AM |
Wow, I can't believe Denver Chief and I disagree so much on this topic. I too don't like being told what to do by big government, and I don't wear my seatbelt near enough, on highways I do, but riding around town or when I worked as a cop and was in a car I didn't, made it hard to get out of the car quickly. My reasoning, is not meant to be an excuse.... If I get a ticket, I'll be a big boy and accept responsibility.
Good points about the insurance, Bugeater, but it is more than that, DC - you have worked accidents, right? Think about the time difference between an accident with injuries to an accident without injuries. Liabilities with insurance companys aside, what about safety of the fire/EMS/Police working an accident, on scene longer, traffic still going by, more drivers at risk for accidents from rubber necking.
One of the main reasons we have to have stupid "click it or ticket" programs is stubborn A-holes like Skip. "I don't and I won't wear it, I'm only hurting myself" - Only, you aren't only hurting yourself! This type of thought is what puts me and other public servants at greater risks. During accidents and even where I might decide to run traffic control. If the department has a good traffic unit, they are going to work in areas of higher accident percentages. With the idea it will decrease the number of accidents.
Seat belts help save lives, yeah yeah, but more importantly it reduces your chances of being injuried, and therefore lowers the response size and time and reduces risks of injuries to the response persons, AND gets you and your broken ass vehicle off the road quicker so other drivers have less distractions and a safer driving experience.
Standing on your personal freedoms is great, if it were true, but the greater good for the greater population wins this one.
|