![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
they were both bad |
Quote:
Other than one play for Brodie, both made Huard look like a Div III QB... |
Quote:
Considering how AWFUL Huard's short throws have been through the first 2 games, he can use all the "dink and dunk" work he can get. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why are you sending me PM's with the same thing in it? You're just as fixated on one play as you claim I am. |
I suspect Herm is keeping the real strengths of the players under wraps until regular season.
Kinda like letting other teams think we can't kick field goals and such. Or fool them into believing our defense has gotten really lousy at tackling. And who really buys into this Croyle making interceptions crap? We know that's all a ploy so our opponents will take us lightly and look past us. Herm is BRILLIANT!!! This is a great strategy. |
Quote:
:rolleyes: I only hope. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Go to NFL.com and look up "Nate Kaeding". The go and Google "NFL K Ball". |
Quote:
Kaeding was better then Medlock. Everyone new he was the best Kicker coming out of college. That's NOT true of Medlock. And if you remember, we did cut Tynes when he was kicking like Medlock. Actually he had a better %. You go look things up - it's what you do every day. |
Quote:
Ok, I will. And you're gonna feel stupid afterwards. |
Kaeding was 67-89 FG, 166-169 PAT at Iowa.
Medlock was 70-88 FG, and 147-148 PAT at UCLA. Oops. You might also want to know what Kaeding himself said about it. He came into the league and immediately missed 5 FG's and 1 PAT in his rookie season. He told an Iowa City newspaper that the NFL K Ball is a HUGE difference between college and pro. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.