ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   1st Half Good & Uglies.... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=167846)

ChiefsfaninPA 08-17-2007 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
wtf are you talking about?

I commented on how well Croyle looked on his one drive...

But after that he was god awful...JUST like Huard was.

I wouldn't say he was God awful. He played like an inexperience QB, which he is. Huard looked God awful and he has experience.

Hootie 08-17-2007 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsfaninPA
I wouldn't say he was God awful. He played like an inexperience QB, which he is. Huard looked God awful and he has experience.

Blah blah blah

they were both bad

Reerun_KC 08-17-2007 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Blah blah blah

they were both bad

maybe so, but Huards bad was much worse than Croyle or Printers....

Other than one play for Brodie, both made Huard look like a Div III QB...

htismaqe 08-17-2007 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsfaninPA
The announcers last night keep saying how unfair it was that Huard didn't get a good chance to make a lot of throws, even asking Carl who is responsible for that and Carl said to ask Solari. There is a reason Huard is doing a lot of dinking and dunking. That is the type of QB he is.

The guys on 810 are going on about it too.

Considering how AWFUL Huard's short throws have been through the first 2 games, he can use all the "dink and dunk" work he can get.

htismaqe 08-17-2007 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Blah blah blah

they were both bad

But one of them is a 1st-year starter and the other is an 11-year vet.

htismaqe 08-17-2007 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancer348
Hitismage, you keep bringing up 1 FG which had minimal impact in the playoff game

How quickly you forget:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yymk4Xv1FZc

You think Medlock is going to hit that?

I responded to you.

Why are you sending me PM's with the same thing in it?

You're just as fixated on one play as you claim I am.

Inspector 08-17-2007 09:02 AM

I suspect Herm is keeping the real strengths of the players under wraps until regular season.

Kinda like letting other teams think we can't kick field goals and such.

Or fool them into believing our defense has gotten really lousy at tackling.

And who really buys into this Croyle making interceptions crap? We know that's all a ploy so our opponents will take us lightly and look past us.

Herm is BRILLIANT!!! This is a great strategy.

ChiefsfaninPA 08-17-2007 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inspector
I suspect Herm is keeping the real strengths of the players under wraps until regular season.

Kinda like letting other teams think we can't kick field goals and such.

Or fool them into believing our defense has gotten really lousy at tackling.

And who really buys into this Croyle making interceptions crap? We know that's all a ploy so our opponents will take us lightly and look past us.

Herm is BRILLIANT!!! This is a great strategy.



:rolleyes:

I only hope.

talastan 08-17-2007 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsfaninPA
:rolleyes:

I only hope.

Ditto!!

TEX 08-17-2007 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief
I love how we have expectations of MIDSEASONFORM in the 2nd preseason game :rolleyes:

I'd still rather have Medlock than Tynes

Kickers can either make 'em or they can't. Usually what you see in preseason is what you get when it counts. Shoot, the Chiefs cut Tynes in past preseasons for kicking how Medlock is now. Medlock $ucks.

htismaqe 08-17-2007 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX
Kickers can either make 'em or they can't. Usually what you see in preseason is what you get when it counts. Shoot, the Chiefs cut Tynes in past preseasons for kicking how Medlock is now. Medlock $ucks.

ROFL

Go to NFL.com and look up "Nate Kaeding".

The go and Google "NFL K Ball".

TEX 08-17-2007 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
ROFL

Go to NFL.com and look up "Nate Kaeding".

The go and Google "NFL K Ball".

ROFL


Kaeding was better then Medlock. Everyone new he was the best Kicker coming out of college. That's NOT true of Medlock. And if you remember, we did cut Tynes when he was kicking like Medlock. Actually he had a better %. You go look things up - it's what you do every day.

htismaqe 08-17-2007 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX
ROFL


Kaeding was better then Medlock. Everyone new he was the best Kicker coming out of college. That's NOT true of Medlock. And if you remember, we did cut Tynes when he was kicking like Medlock. Actually he had a better %. You go look things up - it's what you do every day.

So you're not interested in an honest conversation. You'd rather take the easy way out and challenge me to go look it up?

Ok, I will.

And you're gonna feel stupid afterwards.

htismaqe 08-17-2007 10:52 AM

Kaeding was 67-89 FG, 166-169 PAT at Iowa.

Medlock was 70-88 FG, and 147-148 PAT at UCLA.

Oops.

You might also want to know what Kaeding himself said about it. He came into the league and immediately missed 5 FG's and 1 PAT in his rookie season. He told an Iowa City newspaper that the NFL K Ball is a HUGE difference between college and pro.

InChiefsHeaven 08-17-2007 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Kaeding was 67-89 FG, 166-169 PAT at Iowa.

Medlock was 70-88 FG, and 147-148 PAT at UCLA.

Oops.

You might also want to know what Kaeding himself said about it. He came into the league and immediately missed 5 FG's and 1 PAT in his rookie season. He told an Iowa City newspaper that the NFL K Ball is a HUGE difference between college and pro.

That's good pwnage right there...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.