![]() |
Personally, not that anyone cares, I'd take BPA at #2 or #3.
If Stafford is at #2 or #3 you take him. If he's not - then I really have no idea. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We're all fans of the team but the team needs alot of change to be good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's not even close, and the weather conditions were very similar. |
Quote:
|
I think people just look at Thigpens stats and don't take circumstances into account, I think he'll be a fine backup.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Keitzman had another line today that I thought was very apt. This isn't going to be exact, but it's very close: "The Chiefs have Mark Teahen at QB, and people think he's the answer." Thigpen has done more than we could have imagined, particularly after the Atl game. Now let's not go crazy making him out to be something he's not. |
And here we go again, by NFL standards it's an average arm.
Sorry I don't see it, I see a guy who completes 55% of his passes in an offense that is over simplified that also tends to freak out if Gonzalez is covered. A guy that should have 10 more INT's than he does and a guy that right now has bad footwork and can't play from center. That's a hell of alot to ask a guy to improve upon, I see a nice backup maybe even a guy that can come in and run a few gimmick plays for you in a game. Tyler Thigpen is like Seneca Wallace. |
Quote:
Just being hypothetical is all. Personally, I think it would be dumb for Detroit to NOT select Stafford. However, I would not be surprised. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.