ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   The Chiefs drafting (_____) would piss you off? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=244192)

BossChief 04-23-2011 02:32 PM

My mistake, I thought it was clear that I was talking about him as a run blocker. I figured that was a given that any second grader could pick up on, but I forgot who I was talking to.

Albert is a damn good run blocker and adequet pass blocker with the skills to improve.

Costanzo isn't an upgrade.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-23-2011 03:39 PM

Albert is going to be the starting LT on this team for at least the next couple of seasons. He needs to just accept that and move on. Lilja and Asomoah aren't a bad set of guards. You don't need a Vermeil Chiefs line to be an elite team.

Titty Meat 04-23-2011 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7586349)
You, you, you Jim Rome wannabe meanie.

ROFL

RealSNR 04-24-2011 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zooks (Post 7586409)
LMAO Re: the Cincy comment.
I'm worried the Chargers are going to miss out on one of the premier 3-4 DEs at #18.
I'd like the Bolts to trade up to Miami's spot to get ahead of Jacksonville and NE but I don't believe Miami would want to sit behind NE and watch them take Ingram.

I doubt Ingram gets taken that high.

Gadzooks 04-25-2011 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 7588728)
I doubt Ingram gets taken that high.

I agree, but it wouldn't be considered a reach.
Bellycheck could pull the trigger on him just to mess with Fishies heads.

Dante84 04-25-2011 12:45 AM

I honestly think the Pats take Daniel Thomas. (eventually, not in the first)

He just seems like a solid fit with that team.

Wish we would snag him if it made sense.

keg in kc 04-25-2011 04:44 AM

I don't think there's ever been a draft where I more strongly wanted to move down, which is really saying something after 2009. So I have a feeling whoever they take, I'm not going to like it.

I will say this much: assuming they don't trade down (they won't...) if they take a quarterback - any quarterback - I will not complain about it. 21 is a perfect position to take a developmental QB, so if they reach for somebody we all thought would go later, draft somebody we expected to go higher but dropped, or god forbid go for somebody like Locker, I'm not going to so much as grunt about it.






Unless it's Stanzi. In which case I'll go batshit crazy ****ing postal.

the Talking Can 04-25-2011 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7589262)

I will say this much: assuming they don't trade down (they won't...) if they take a quarterback - any quarterback - I will not complain about it. 21 is a perfect position to take a developmental QB, so if they reach for somebody we all thought would go later, draft somebody we expected to go higher but dropped, or god forbid go for somebody like Locker, I'm not going to so much as grunt about it.






Unless it's Stanzi. In which case I'll go batshit crazy ****ing postal.


ditto

tyton75 04-25-2011 05:36 AM

The only pick that would piss me off is if we picked a Safety... everything else would be a position of some need


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.