![]() |
And since Stanzi is gonna be the guy, we need to sure up this oline this offseason.
Trade down in the first, get an extra second, draft Konz in the first, Hightower in the second and Reynolds in the second. Chris Polk in the third. |
Quote:
Sorry should have made more clear. |
Quote:
They supported Bledsoe to the last second. Parcels even issues statement after statement that Drew was the guy, drew was the guy....then, bam. The switch was made and there was no going back. The two scenarios are eerily similar, too. Dallas traded a first rounder for Drew and had him on a big contract. Drew took a lot of sacks and didn't make the best decisions. Romo had a stronger arm, more mobility, quicker release and he moved the offense when it had become stagnant with Drew under center. Shit, both Romo and Stanzi both have made some questionable decisions in games, too. I think that Cassel will be playing for his career over the course of the next 6-8 games and could get pulled at anytime in that span and once that switch is made, there is no going back. |
I don't even wanna see Cassel play six to eight more games.
Stanzi needs to work his ass off this offseasn and overtake him in training camp. |
Quote:
When you are the guy that was responsible for spending 40 million dollars of your owners money on a guy like Cassel and his upcoming years salary is the lowest year of the deal, I can't see him being cut. Im pretty much prepared for him to begin 2012 as the starter. Hope for the best and prepare for the worst. That's the ONLY way to be a Chiefs fan. |
I don't think Romeo wants any part of Cassel. He's seen what he does to his defense.
I think Stanzi will be given a shot to compete. |
My hope is that we have our bye around week 6 or 7 and a home divisional game afterwards.
That would be the game I would have circled when the schedule comes out. |
So you don't think there is anyway Stanzi starts the year?
|
It would be so great if Stanzi is the guy. It would really free up this upcoming draft.
Trade down, take Konz, get a second, take Reynolds and Hightower in the second. |
If it's a legit competition between Cassel and Stanzi, Stanzi is the game one starter.
He is equal or superior to Cassel in every way a quarterback is judged. Gotta remember it's a business, though. I agree that Romeo doesn't like Cassel, too. I think that will play into his hire for OC and how he is looking "outside the tree" He sees what we see. Hot garbage. You can't bring in a guy like Tom Clements and tell him Cassel is really good and expect him to go along with it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well I hate Iowa and I think he's better at playing quarterback than Matt Cassel.
What one thing does Cassel do better than Stanzi? |
Quote:
I have seen every game Stanzi played in college. Other than that, I usually only get to watch sec and a few other games on primetime because I work 6 days a week as a satellite installer and that takes away my Saturday afternoons...but, I always DVR the Iowa games if I can't watch them live. I saw a kid TAKE the starters job from a highly recruited guy in Christianson (when Stanzi really wasn't recruited highly) and win a ****ton of games for Iowa in his three years as starter. I also saw him win all three bowl games. I watched him make bad mistakes and consistently make up for them late in games as a soph and junior andi saw him grow into a really good quarterback that could succeed in the NFL over the course of the final half of his junior year and his whole senior year. In preseason, he displayed the best skillset out of the three quarterbacks....and it wasn't even close. So, yeah if he had played for Cal or something...ofcourse I wouldn't be as well informed as I am about him. Theta why I have always called for us to draft the cream of the crop (from the eye test) that Iowa has had to offer. |
Quote:
Hold on.... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.