bricks |
03-09-2012 10:00 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fruit Ninja
(Post 8435515)
Well, to be fair, the Chiefs dont do shit and are still the Chiefs. lol If we give up 3 first rounders or nothing, we still got Matt Cassel.
Its to much to give up, but hey, we arent going a damn place either. lol I dont see all that much of a difference, except they at least get some RG3 Hype. We got ugh... yeah
|
I agree. The Chiefs are very passive.
Which is sometimes not a bad thing. In my mind, teams can be very passive and still make excellent decisions. Look at the Steelers as an example. Besides, FA can be a big time crap shoot. At the end of the day, its how you carry through and progress with your evaluation and decision making. To me, it dont make a difference if your passive or aggressive. Although, Im not gonna lie, I want to see them aggressive in pursuing Manning. Just because he I believe he is soooo damn good he could make KC a SuperBowl contender overnight. But I'm just not inclined to believe they will be aggressive. It's just not who they are. So hearing that we have no interviews lined up with him doesn't surprise me. If they don't sign him, it'll be because they'll lose the bidding war thanks in large part to their passiveness.
Itll just add to the frustration. But more than anything, losing out on Manning wont overcome the terrible personnel decisions this franchise has made in the past . (i.e., trading for Cassel and hiring Haley)
*We can go somewhere if we get that quarterback and right offensive system in place. I'm on the Manning wagon.
|