Bears aren't a bad pick and agree Pitt's a better pick than a fraud Denver team. Vikes made me chuckle a bit in that deep NFC, they are way down my list.

thats why I picked the Vikings, they are a surprising 5-2, they play tough defense and have been close in every game but their loss to the Redskins. They should have definitely beat the Colts but they handled the 49ers, and they have the Bucs, Seattle, Detroit, Chicagox2, Packersx2, St Louis and Houston.

They can hang with Detroit, St Louis, Tampa and Seattle they just have to split a game with Chicago or GB and they are right in it.

Really?

Passing:

2005 Broncos: 210 ypg, 7.4 ypa
2012 Texans: 227 ypg, 7.4 ypa

Rushing:

2005 Broncos: 158.7 ypg, 4.7 ypc
2012 Texans: 140.9 ypg, 4.0 ypc

Looks pretty evenly matched to me. The Texans pass more, but they aren't doing it any more efficiently. They are less successful at running, though.

Texans vs. Packers

Packers/Texans

Matt Schaub has never won a playoff game yet people are picking them in the superbowl, please. Besides Andre Johnson, Foster, Daniels and Ben Tate they have no other options and their secondary is suspect.

And they utterly destroyed the Ravens. Of all teams in the AFC they have the fewest weaknesses. They are solid on offense, defense, and special teams.

His laid back, never holding forth, often seemingly passionless demeanor is the absolute perfect foil to the NY hype, lights & pressure.

He's one of the two QB's chosen in my fantasyland.

49ers vs Texans

Texans vs. 49'ers...

Cleveland vs. Carolina

Seahawks vs Texans

You'd better hope, because I don't think the Seahawks match up well against the Chiefs.