If Marty had of known the difference between playing to win and playing not to lose in the playoffs things would have been different. He was really aggressive in the regular season but turned into Herman Edwards in the playoffs.

Would I be completely satisfied if they got that close without ever winning it all? Of course I wouldn't. Nobody would.

But will I be extremely happy if Andy Reid is able to establish a program that has sustained success over a long period of time, presumably with plenty of thrills along the way, even if Reid never manages to hoist the Lombardi Trophy over his head?

Hell yes.

Clark Hunt has recognized what a monumental mistake Pioli was. He's blowing up the entire organization and turning it over to a proven winner. Anyone who isn't ecstatic about the changes that are taking place right now is a freaking idiot.

I'm sure there will be bumps along the way, and I'm sure every now and then Andy Reid will make a decision that is sharply criticized by everyone (including me). But at least Clark Hunt is doing the right thing and pointing the Chiefs in the right direction. For the first time in years I actually have some optimism about this team. This is the BEST Chiefs' coaching hire since Marty Schottenheimer. And despite what any Schottenheimer-bashers may think, that was a GREAT coaching hire.

Marty can go F himself permanetly....

Exactly this.....

I would say you need a public poll, but this is giving us an honest outlook on the fanbase's opinion.


I am greatly disappointed.

Kind of what I was thinking.

I'm not ok with just making the dance every year.

But if he makes it to a Super Bowl - even if they lose it - I'm in.

I'm not saying he should be the HC again. The one thing he could do that we seem to have had a problem with is Marty could read talent and usually drafted guys that were keepers. He might make a decent GM, especially with Hunt saying that the HC will not answer to the GM.