ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Donovan McNabb Says Stafford Hasn't Earned His Contract (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274430)

Marcellus 07-10-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9804267)
He has shown that he is capable of being a superstar. He has that in him. He has something that Alex Smith simply does not have in him.

17-28 career and more injury prone than Smith?

Throws for a ton of yards when throwing it 45 times a game and losing makes you a star?

Stafford is a prime example of CP lust for another QB no matter who it is.

This thread is hilarious.

Mav 07-10-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9804267)
He has shown that he is capable of being a superstar. He has that in him. He has something that Alex Smith simply does not have in him.

I wonder how many qbs could have great success in a dome throwing to Calvin Johnson.

And here is my point. This is not about Alex Smith. But, we have seen this before. Dante Culpepper. He was a beast when he had Randy Moss, and Cris Carter. Take those two away, and he was nothing.

Hootie 07-10-2013 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9804260)
I would have traded our first overall pick for Stafford gladly for Stafford. Hell, I'd have thrown in the draft picks we spent on Alex Smith.

I don't disagree, I would have too. However, I can at least acknowledge Stafford has much more Cutler in him than say a guy like Andrew Luck. Unless he works on his mechanics he'll never be in the elite tier of NFL QBs.

O.city 07-10-2013 08:16 PM

Of course that's why we traded for Alex smith, for what he can bring, not what he's done to this point.


But stafford has shown that he's capable of being an upper echelon talent so you lock him up long term. As we know being chief fans these guys don't just fall out of trees. Once they finally (if ever) get good coaching in Detroit, they've got a their qb to go with a really good core

Mav 07-10-2013 08:17 PM

I believe whole heartedly that if the Lions committed to finding a steady run game, and to getting a decent oline, that Stafford could be a top 10 qb. he has all of the potential, and skills.

That's why they just handed him 53 mil. POTENTIAL.

Deberg_1990 07-10-2013 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804231)
Let me get this straight, you propose that any QB that has had marginal success (Romo and Stafford) should get a block buster deal when the time comes because Oh shit what else are they going to do?

BTW did you not follow this offseason and draft? CP fully believes any young QB is a talented QB and could have been had in rounds 1 -4 this year and we ****ed up so why not Dallas, Baltimore or Detroit?

This thread is hilarious, its the exact opposite of the predraft threads.

No, I'm just saying Dallas and Detroit had to resign those guys because there wasn't a better alternative. Nothing proven. Of course they stay stagnant somewhat, but both these franchises have a lot bigger problems than QB.

O.city 07-10-2013 08:19 PM

Is detroit being bad all on Stafford?


There is some double standard going here. Look at the coaching the guy has had. I don't see how you can defend Alex smith and his early career then flip on Stafford who has more physical ability and has shown thus much

Marcellus 07-10-2013 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9804290)
No, I'm just saying Dallas and Detroit had to resign those guys because there wasn't a better alternative. Nothing proven. Of course they stay stagnant somewhat, but both these franchises have a lot bigger problems than QB.

I will say this Detroit was smart enough to not make it a long term deal which tells you how much they believe in Stafford.

Mostly guaranteed so Stafford gets most of it locked up and they can get out soon if its a bust.

Mav 07-10-2013 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804299)
I will say this Detroit was smart enough to not make it a long term deal which tells you how much they believe in Stafford.

Mostly guaranteed so Stafford gets most of it locked up and they can get out soon if its a bust.

I would have to believe that is more from Staffords agents. If the team doesn't improve, he can get out sooner and get to a franchise that has a clue. The lions are inept.

Marcellus 07-10-2013 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9804293)
Is detroit being bad all on Stafford?


There is some double standard going here. Look at the coaching the guy has had. I don't see how you can defend Alex smith and his early career then flip on Stafford who has more physical ability and has shown thus much

Oh I agree, completely and said that earlier in this thread. People are apologizing for Stafford and saying think how good he would be with real coaching.

The same people bashing Smith early in his career.

The same people bashing Smith for being injury prone.

But hey, let Stafford be injury prone then throw it 45 times a game for under 60% completion to the best WR in football and he must be a complete stud who cant be turned lose.

Nope no double standard here.

And to be clear I have never said Smith needs a big contract he hasn't earned (AKA CAssel).

Hammock Parties 07-10-2013 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804281)
Stafford is a prime example of CP lust for another QB no matter who it is.

I'd just like a QB who can make all the throws, please.

Stafford would get even more money on the open market.

And the Lions know this.

Years of "winning" with shit QBs have convinced our moronic fanbase that "overpaying" for someone like Stafford is stupid.

Marcellus 07-10-2013 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9804307)
I'd just like a QB who can make all the throws, please.

Stafford would get even more money on the open market.

And the Lions know this.

Years of "winning" with shit QBs have convinced our moronic fanbase that "overpaying" for someone like Stafford is stupid.

Someone like Stafford?

You mean Jeff George.

Mav 07-10-2013 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9804307)
I'd just like a QB who can make all the throws, please.

Stafford would get even more money on the open market.

And the Lions know this.

Years of "winning" with shit QBs have convinced our moronic fanbase that "overpaying" for someone like Stafford is stupid.

Not everyone. The chiefs may have overpaid with draft picks, a 2nd and 3rd in your eyes, but they certainly aren't over paying with the check book. 8 mil, is average. Perfect for a shitty no arm sorry sack of shit qb that you claim alex smith is.

Mav 07-10-2013 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804305)
Oh I agree, completely and said that earlier in this thread. People are apologizing for Stafford and saying think how good he would be with real coaching.

The same people bashing Smith early in his career.

The same people bashing Smith for being injury prone.

But hey, let Stafford be injury prone then throw it 45 times a game for under 60% completion to the best WR in football and he must be a complete stud who cant be turned lose.

Nope no double standard here.

And to be clear I have never said Smith needs a big contract he hasn't earned (AKA CAssel).

that's a good point. People have pointed out his coaching, and talent surrounding him. But let me make that argument for alex, and im a dumb ass homer who needs to shut up. Hell he never even had a calvin to throw to.

O.city 07-10-2013 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804309)
Someone like Stafford?

You mean Jeff George.

That's a terrible comparison.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.