You just cited one of the most overrated QB's of all time as the most underrated QB of all time.

Bradshaw had about as much to do with the Steelers' success as Trent Dilfer did with Baltimore. Difference being, I think Dilfer's stats were a bit better than Bradshaw's. Oh, and Dilfer's receivers were worse.

I'm glad to see Tony finally getting some love. I've been beating the Tony Romo drum to Dallas fans his entire career. They love to blame him for every loss. Even when they lost that game to the Broncos two years ago where the score was something like 49-51, Romo ended it with an INT, so everybody in Texas threw the blame at him. Ridiculous.

First of all, "idiocracy" isn't a word. You might want to brush up on the English language before trying to insult others' intelligence. You might be thinking of "idiocy," which is the perfect description of your takes.

Second of all, I don't have to "act" like Wilson blew the Super Bowl, because he actually did. He was terrible for half the game. He was 3-8 with a 5.1 QBR in the fourth quarter. He threw the biggest choke interception in the history of the Super Bowl. There's zero argument to be made that he didn't blow the game. In fact, the last time you tried to drag me into this debate, you were so thoroughly owned that you threw a tantrum and decided you were "done talking about the Super Bowl."

he had a 90 QBR for the entire game. 90. 90 QBR.

Tom Brady had an 82.

The Patriots held the ball the entire 4th quarter until "the drive."

The one drive the Hawks had Russell was going to hit his guy in stride for a HUGE gain but the Pats DB got away with terrible pass interference by falling down and grabbing the dude's foot and getting away with it.

90 QBR for the entire game.

How can you be "terrible for a half" and have a 90 QBR for the game?

You're a dumb****. Plain and simple.

Super Bowl QBR:

Russell Wilson : 90.8
Tom Brady: 81.1

...

nice try, dip****

http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=400749027

Don't forget how he totally shat the bed on Dallas' last THREE drives. The interception was just the cherry on top of the shit sandwich, but that'll be what you obsess over in order to give Romo a pass.

http://i.imgur.com/JOmFS0G.jpg

https://twitter.com/ESPNStatsInfo/st...22521748697090

Seattle possessed the ball for less than 3 minutes in the 4th quarter and 1 of the drives was ended by the aforementioned missed call ... and it was a TERRIBLE missed call.

There is a reason why his 5 QBR didn't effect his overall 90 QBR for the game ... because he didn't really do anything until the final drive because they were trying to kill the clock playing not to lose and trying to keep the ball away from Brady

90.8 QBR for the game

and, once again, got his team in position to win the game (per usual) when it counted most

Butler just made the play of the decade

RUSSELL WILSON QBR : 90.8
TOM BRADY QBR: 81.1

Wilson 2 career Super Bowls ...

QBR: 88.1 and 90.8

yeah, Russell Dilfer

you're a ****ing dipshit

In terms of one play swinging a team’s chances of winning the Super Bowl, the second-down interception was probably the most important in the history of the NFL. Burke’s Advanced Football Analytics model suggested after the game that the Patriots’ chances of winning jumped from 12 percent before the interception to 99 percent afterward, for a swing of 87 percentage points. It’s difficult for one play in any context to shift things that dramatically.

The Mike Jones tackle of Kevin Dyson at the 1-yard line in Super Bowl XXXIV came to mind, but that was a 23-16 game; even if Dyson had gotten in, Tennessee’s chances of winning would have risen only to about 50 percent, since the two teams would have gone to overtime (or Tennessee would have attempted a two-pointer, which would also have put its chances of winning near 50 percent). The most meaningful play before this one was probably Scott Norwood’s missed 47-yard field goal in a 20-19 game at the end of Super Bowl XXV, but there’s no way he had an 87 percent chance of making the game-winning field goal to begin with, so even reducing Buffalo’s chances to zero wouldn’t match Wilson’s interception.

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/su...ttle-seahawks/

well no ****ing shit moron

that terrible playcall obviously ended the Super Bowl

yet, only two people have blamed Russell Wilson on this board for it ... you and Just Passin' By

Gee, wonder why?

You two are the biggest dumb****s on the board.

of course, this is the same board that said Russell played "average" when he was the best player on the field and had a 90.8 QBR (which is clutch based formula) ...

this board knows dick about QB play

that much I know

2014: Spotted a huge lead by Lynch, Hauschka, Harvin and the defense, and of course, Fivehead having his usual playoff meltdown. He did get to pad his stats a bit in the second half, though. The Super Bowl MVP was rightfully awarded to a defensive player instead of Wilson.

2015: Couldn't even complete a pass until the second quarter; 3-10 on third down; blew a ten-point lead (couldn't even score, even while being bailed out with miracle catches); biggest choke INT in NFL history.

The playcall wasn't good, but last I checked, Pete Carroll wasn't the one who threw that pick, and neither was Darrell Bevell.

Russell executed the play that was called very well. It's not his fault one bit. The defender made a legendary play.

I could go round, and round, and round and the numbers will still say Russel Wilson had a 90.1 QBR in the Super Bowl and was the best player and quarterback in that Super Bowl ... and you'll try to manipulate the numbers because you're an idiot like you did with that 2007 Dallas playoff game against the Giants ...

but it's pointless.

You're a dipshit.