ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Talib: Facemask was intentional (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=298115)

kcpasco 02-08-2016 03:38 PM

I am amused by the hypocrisy of the NFL, but I'll keep watching because it's good entertainment.

suzzer99 02-08-2016 03:42 PM

Of course if the ref does his job and ejects Talib - then the idiot punditry descends upon you talking about the refs "trying to be part of the game".

loochy 02-08-2016 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 12071794)
Of course if the ref does his job and ejects Talib - then the idiot punditry descends upon you talking about the refs "trying to be part of the game".

They ARE part of the game.

Quesadilla Joe 02-08-2016 03:50 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Aqib Talib&#39;s got a really big team and they need some really rings!! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SB50?src=hash">#SB50</a> <a href="https://t.co/ReUCqD5bf1">pic.twitter.com/ReUCqD5bf1</a></p>&mdash; NFL (@NFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFL/status/696537086359261184">February 8, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RealSNR 02-08-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 12071770)
You don't think it was flagrant?

I do. The ballcarrier should have been shooting two free throws and gotten the ball.

Rain Man 02-08-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 12071794)
Of course if the ref does his job and ejects Talib - then the idiot punditry descends upon you talking about the refs "trying to be part of the game".

That's the challenge. An ejection is pretty severe, and it wouldn't be used on Broncos or Patriots. It would only be used on other teams, and would only make the bias of the league worse.

Chief Pagan 02-08-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 12071606)
There's a penalty for being honest?

In a court of law, absolutely.

TimBone 02-08-2016 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12071646)
Well, that settles it. Is that good enough for TimBone?

No, it's not. You guys are asking for a guy to be ejected for a face mask in the Super Bowl when it hasn't happened in a regular season game all year. That's all I'm saying.

He should be fined, and with his comments today(admitting it was on purpose), he should get a heavy suspension.

But they were not going to eject him for that play. Not in the Super Bowl.

kcpasco 02-08-2016 03:59 PM

This is my issue, if the NFL wants to acknowledge that football is a violent and dangerous game played by a bunch of yoked up assholes, then I am ok with just a 1 yard penalty. But if they want to continue on their soap box about how player safety is the number 1 priority and not profits, then I'll just keep shaking my head at shit like this.

Which is it Roger?

TinyEvel 02-08-2016 04:01 PM

“My teammates knew what it was,” Talib said. “He was on the 3-yard line. (With) a personal foul, he was on the 1 1/2-yard line, so it is what it is.”


This is why they need t change the penalty rules for intentional shit like this.

staylor26 02-08-2016 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12071834)
No, it's not. You guys are asking for a guy to be ejected for a face mask in the Super Bowl when it hasn't happened in a regular season game all year. That's all I'm saying.

He should be fined, and with his comments today(admitting it was on purpose), he should get a heavy suspension.

But they were not going to eject him for that play. Not in the Super Bowl.

I understand they were never going to, but are you saying they shouldn't?

Easy 6 02-08-2016 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 12071813)
<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Aqib Talib&#39;s got a really big team and they need some really rings!! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SB50?src=hash">#SB50</a> <a href="https://t.co/ReUCqD5bf1">pic.twitter.com/ReUCqD5bf1</a></p>&mdash; NFL (@NFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFL/status/696537086359261184">February 8, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

To bring that in here, defending your mugger...

Dinver fans trollin this game hard

Neg blast

TimBone 02-08-2016 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12071841)
I understand they were never going to, but are you saying they shouldn't?

Naw, not with zero face mask ejections all year. That one was bad, but I've seen equally (or almost) as bad before, with no ejection.

If they want to start doing it next year, then I'm actually all for it. But you can't do it out of nowhere in the SB.

TimBone 02-08-2016 04:05 PM

But, yeah. It was a dirty play. And he's a scumbag. Like I mentioned earlier.

Rain Man 02-08-2016 04:06 PM

I've never thought about this before, but it's interesting that all penalties for the most part are paid in yardage and downs.

If you have a personal foul or unsportsmanlike conduct, both of which affect player safety and/or the reputation of the sport, it seems like teams should have a choice. Take the penalty in yards or put the offending player in a penalty box for a while to cool down and mature.

What would be an appropriate penalty box time for for a run of the mill personal foul like the ones the Broncos commit ten times a game?

And would you measure it in plays or clock time or something else? It's a little complicated due to the nature of football having specialized offensive, defensive, and special teams units.

It seems like the penalties should be measured in either plays or drives. In this case, the Panthers could take a 1 yard penalty or they could put Talib in the penalty box for two offensive drives or 10 defensive plays or something like that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.