ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Update on Tyreek Hill

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Update on Tyreek Hill (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322406)

Welp, this was a useless waste of my time.

Hi there.

I wrote this a few weeks back. This might help with the "custody" question.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...1#post14175131

Quote:

Hi all. I have a legitimate update. It is not much, but it is an update nonetheless.

Preface:

1. This information comes from a very trusted, personal source, who is in a position to know. It is accurate.
2. I will not tell you the source. I don't care if you don't believe me.
3. This information may or may not be made public in the future, so this means that I may or may not be proven right in the eyes of you all. Again - I don't care if you don't believe me.

The Update

Quote:

The state has decided there is a "more-than-likely" reality that the child has suffered neglect/abuse of some sort, and therefore they are petitioning that the child become the state's custody.

I am told this is often a temporary measure, and often a tactic for when investigators are trying to find more information. Often, it is used to pit one spouse against the other to "flip" on their partner, although that doesn't necessarily mean that is the case here. Essentially, the investigators are trying to get to the bottom of HOW and WHY the child suffered harm.

Tyreek has retained a lawyer with experience in this area to represent him in this matter. This does not mean that Tyreek - or anyone - is being charged with anything at this point.

Parents in this type of situation may still have the child "live" with them even if the state has "custody." I am not sure what their current living arrangements are.

It is important to note that this situation doesn't rule out a third party, like a grandparent, either, but it also doesn't mean that is who did it. This is why they are investigating - to find out who did, or didn't, do what.

They have not shared with me what the alleged neglect/abuse entailed, though there are some obvious guesses based on reports.

I am told that if a person had told on another person - and there was sufficient evidence - it would likely have surfaced by now and that action would have been taken, like someone being charged. The fact that no one has been charged yet likely indicates that the state does not have the evidence it needs to bring charges on a person.

That is not to say someone can change their mind and say something, or that the child can act as a witness should he talk.

This could wrap up tomorrow, or it could wrap up 10 months from now. Depends on if the state ever obtains evidence to bring charges on anyone.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 14213816)

I'd imagine with this news, the NFL is going to suspend him for some sort of game(s) right?

Actually they requested the police reports the day after they came out and so far the NFL hasn’t even opened an investigation into him

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14213827)

Actually they requested the police reports the day after they came out and so far the NFL hasn’t even opened an investigation into him

Yea but that's not how the NFL works. You don't need to be charged by the law for the NFL to suspend you. The NFL will suspend you because they feel like it or because the court of public opinion/media is burning the shield too hot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 14213836)

Bullshit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 14213816)

I'd imagine with this news, the NFL is going to suspend him for some sort of game(s) right?

ProFootballTalk just tweeted about him losing custody.

Can this be over already.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chiefs receiver Tyreek Hill’s son removed from parents’ care<br><br>New story from ⁦⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/kclaurab?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@kclaurab</a>⁩, ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/st_vockrodt?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@st_vockrodt</a>⁩ and me <a href="https://t.co/H07VVcdxgQ">https://t.co/H07VVcdxgQ</a></p>— Brooke Pryor (@bepryor) <a href="https://twitter.com/bepryor/status/1119019815690174464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On April 5, we first saw Hill enter the Johnson County Courthouse. Hill’s attorney told KCTV5 “no comment” before Hill went before a family court judge that day. Multiple sources confirm to KCTV5 that was an emergency hearing and Hill’s child was temporarily placed in another home, pending further court action.

The Kansas Department for Children and Families is investigating child abuse claims at Hill’s home. DCF says the investigation stemmed from an ongoing report it received, but did not say more.

The Johnson County District Attorney’s office is also investigating “allegations regarding Tyreek Hill.”

The D.A. has not given a timeline for when the prosecutor’s office will conclude its investigation or if charges will be filed.

Rotoworld saying that this will likely result in a “lengthy suspension, outright release, or both”

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 14213885)

Rotoworld saying that this will likely result in a “lengthy suspension, outright release, or both”

Which is being based on Hunt, which is a completely different situation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 14213885)

Rotoworld saying that this will likely result in a “lengthy suspension, outright release, or both”

That’s from The Star. Rotoworld is reporting what they get from The Star. In other words, it’s not reliable.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 14213885)

Rotoworld saying that this will likely result in a “lengthy suspension, outright release, or both”

That is supremely irresponsible reporting. They cite the Star as the source, yet add their two cent recommendation of a presumption of guilt and subsequent punishment? Wow.

What a headache for the Chiefs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 14213892)

^^^