ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Jamaal Charles Signs Extension (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=238260)

MIAdragon 12-12-2010 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7250235)
I say he is going to New England. They have way more ammo to get him.

I don't see the Pats giving up what it going to take to get him. They like building through tue draft and picking up scraps.

Reaper16 12-12-2010 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 7249454)
...and you'd be wrong.

...reminds me of the Seattle fans telling me they were sorry we were gonna lose.

Here's hoping.

DaneMcCloud 12-12-2010 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 7250278)
I don't see the Pats giving up what it going to take to get him. They like building through tue draft and picking up scraps.

Dude, I've said this since October that New England is the most logical landing spot for Fitz because they have two firsts, two seconds, two thirds and two fourths.

They could give up four picks and still have their first four picks.

zonachief 12-13-2010 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7250700)
Dude, I've said this since October that New England is the most logical landing spot for Fitz because they have two firsts, two seconds, two thirds and two fourths.

They could give up four picks and still have their first four picks.

I think fitz has a opt out clause in his contract so he would be a free agent.

Rausch 12-13-2010 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7250700)
Dude, I've said this since October that New England is the most logical landing spot for Fitz because they have two firsts, two seconds, two thirds and two fourths.

They could give up four picks and still have their first four picks.

But they're a good team, they know how to build a good team, and they aren't ****ing reeruned like we are so they won't...

Hootie 12-13-2010 02:38 AM

dude a Larry Fitzgerald trade is a no risk trade...

he is the ultimate team player with loads and loads of talent

he is made for new england, unfortunately

Rausch 12-13-2010 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7255289)
dude a Larry Fitzgerald trade is a no risk trade...

he is the ultimate team player with loads and loads of talent

he is made for new england, unfortunately

NE buys low and sells high.

Randy Moss, for example.

They milked that man for all he was worth and knew once he hit worthless.

And still got some for him...

Hootie 12-13-2010 02:45 AM

Randy Moss was a known team cancer...

Fitzgerald is not...

he's the ultimate Patriot in their eyes...I guarantee it...

they bought Welker for a 2nd and a 7th before Welker was Welker...

if they want Fitzgerald they'll pay for him...I know that for sure

Rausch 12-13-2010 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7255295)
Randy Moss was a known team cancer...

Fitzgerald is not...

he's the ultimate Patriot in their eyes...I guarantee it...

they bought Welker for a 2nd and a 7th before Welker was Welker...

BECAUSE THEY ****ING BUY LOW AND SELL HIGH.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7255295)
if they want Fitzgerald they'll pay for him...I know that for sure

People who want crack bad enough will sell their kids for it.

NE won't.

It's not that he wouldn't be perfect, it's not that he wouldn't love to go there, it's that THEY DON'T NEED HIM as much as any other team.

So, other teams will be willing to pay/trade more.

Hootie 12-13-2010 03:35 AM

if Fitzgerald finds his way on the trade market...

I would bet the farm New England would end up with him...

he's a perfect fit for that organization and they have more available assets than any NFL team

Hootie 12-13-2010 03:37 AM

Fitzgerald is one of VERY FEW NFL players I'd give 2+ 1st round picks for...

New England could trade a 1, 1 and 3 for Fitz and their fan base would be ecstatic and their team would be exponentially better...

Fitz and Brady?

Fitz the ultimate route runner and team player on a Belichick team?

Frankly, that's downright FRIGHTENING...and I pray to God that doesn't happen.

I'd rather have my favorite football player (Fitzy) on the Broncos or Raiders than on the Patriots.

The Bad Guy 12-13-2010 08:05 AM

I think trading for a Fitz is pretty unnecessary for the Patriots and a move I can't see them making.

They value their draft picks above all else. They have a passing offense that is lights out right now with Welker, Branch and Tate. They went back to the Patriots heyday where you have a bunch of multi-dimensional receivers that individually don't overwhelm you, but collectively they are unstoppable.

I'd give a #1 and a #4 for Fitz and never think twice about it again. This offense needs someone to take the heat off Bowe and with Fitz's Haley connections, his relationship with Bowe and his work ethic, it's a natural fit.

Mr. Laz 12-14-2010 12:12 PM

The real Jamaal Charles numbers

Posted by Mike Florio on December 14, 2010, 11:14 AM EST
http://nbcprofootballtalk.files.word...wks2.jpg?w=250

As we predicted on Sunday, the contract given by the Chiefs to running back Jamaal Charles wasn’t as good as initially advertised.

We were confident in making the prediction because no contract ever ends up being as good as initially advertised.

Per a league source, the reported guarantee of $13 million is actually $8 million, in the form of a roster bonus paid upon (or not long after) execution of the deal. There’s another $2 million in injury guarantees only.

Also, the reported value of $32.5 million over five years (an average of $6.5 million) is the maximum package, with all incentives reached. The base package has an annual value closer to $5.5 million.


Though the drop isn’t as dramatic as the gap between the initial ESPN report and the subsequent ESPN report regarding Donovan McNabb’s deal with the Redskins, we hope that those of us who report the initial numbers eventually will acknowledge the fact that there’s a disconnect between those numbers and the real numbers.

Stinger 12-14-2010 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7258070)
The real Jamaal Charles numbers

Posted by Mike Florio on December 14, 2010, 11:14 AM EST
http://nbcprofootballtalk.files.word...wks2.jpg?w=250

As we predicted on Sunday, the contract given by the Chiefs to running back Jamaal Charles wasn’t as good as initially advertised.

We were confident in making the prediction because no contract ever ends up being as good as initially advertised.

Per a league source, the reported guarantee of $13 million is actually $8 million, in the form of a roster bonus paid upon (or not long after) execution of the deal. There’s another $2 million in injury guarantees only.

Also, the reported value of $32.5 million over five years (an average of $6.5 million) is the maximum package, with all incentives reached. The base package has an annual value closer to $5.5 million.


Though the drop isn’t as dramatic as the gap between the initial ESPN report and the subsequent ESPN report regarding Donovan McNabb’s deal with the Redskins, we hope that those of us who report the initial numbers eventually will acknowledge the fact that there’s a disconnect between those numbers and the real numbers.

Dammit Carl!!!!!!! :cuss: :cuss:

Wait Wut ..............

milkman 12-14-2010 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zonachief (Post 7255283)
I think fitz has a opt out clause in his contract so he would be a free agent.

I believe, though I might well be wrong, that his contract goes through 2012, and that opt out is after the '11 season.

vailpass 12-14-2010 12:19 PM

LMAO some of you are still talking about Fitz playing in KC with Cassel? LMAO

mcaj22 12-14-2010 12:20 PM

the opt out for Fitz and the Cards is AFTER the '11 season.

So if you Chiefs fans want him bad enough for next season and can't wait another year, Pioli would have to sell farm for him most likely on draft day to have a chance at him a year earlier than when he can actually opt out.

vailpass 12-14-2010 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 7258088)
the opt out for Fitz and the Cards is AFTER the '11 season.

So if you Chiefs fans want him bad enough for next season and can't wait another year, Pioli would have to sell farm for him most likely on draft day to have a chance at him a year earlier than when he can actually opt out.

Fitz has a no-trade clause.

milkman 12-14-2010 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258096)
Fitz has a no-trade clause.

Which he can waive if he so chooses.

vailpass 12-14-2010 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7258106)
Which he can waive if he so chooses.

And he would...to go to a SB contender with a top-tier QB who will allow him to regain the level of play he had when Kurt was throwing to him. Or so says the local talk radio here.

milkman 12-14-2010 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258108)
And he would...to go to a SB contender with a top-tier QB who will allow him to regain the level of play he had when Kurt was throwing to him. Or so says the local talk radio here.

So you have some radio taking head speculating what it might take to get Fitz to waive.

There's been speculation that he would like to play for Haley, and whether you recognize it or not, the Chiefs are on the upswing.

mcaj22 12-14-2010 12:51 PM

I think the best chance for the Chiefs to get him would be to trade for him before he can opt to walk on the open market. If he walks after the '11 season then yes there will be much better teams after his services that the Chiefs would need to compete with.

And the Patriots are not afraid to throw money around, just because the MO of the Patriots Way is to buy low and sell high, doesn't mean they havent given 30 year old guys like Corey Dillion and Adalius Thomas 30 million contracts without thinking twice. The Pats have done it, they just dont do it often thats all.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7258129)
So you have some radio taking head speculating what it might take to get Fitz to waive.

There's been speculation that he would like to play for Haley, and whether you recognize it or not, the Chiefs are on the upswing.

Cassel.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 7258150)
I think the best chance for the Chiefs to get him would be to trade for him before he can opt to walk on the open market. If he walks after the '11 season then yes there will be much better teams after his services that the Chiefs would need to compete with.

And the Patriots are not afraid to throw money around, just because the MO of the Patriots Way is to buy low and sell high, doesn't mean they havent given 30 year old guys like Corey Dillion and Adalius Thomas 30 million contracts without thinking twice. The Pats have done it, they just dont do it often thats all.

What don't you understand about a no-trade clause?

The Bad Guy 12-14-2010 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258108)
And he would...to go to a SB contender with a top-tier QB who will allow him to regain the level of play he had when Kurt was throwing to him. Or so says the local talk radio here.

Or to play for the coach he said he'd go to Canada to play for?

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7258177)
Or to play for the coach he said he'd go to Canada to play for?

Whatever you like to think. Certainly stranger things have happened, and Fitz is a very inward-looking dude (seriously).

Rain Man 12-14-2010 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258182)
Whatever you like to think. Who knows, maybe an elite WR would want to go to a non-SB contender with a mediocre QB to reunite with a coach who used to be his OC. Certainly stranger things have happened, and Fitz is a very inward-looking dude (seriously).

He probably had a lot of time to think back when he was traveling the world with Jared Allen and Boomer Grigsby.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 7258189)
He probably had a lot of time to think back when he was traveling the world with Jared Allen and Boomer Grigsby.

I took out the non-SB contender part because who knows what will happen in the next 2 years?
LMAO at the world-traveling comment.

The Bad Guy 12-14-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258182)
Whatever you like to think. Certainly stranger things have happened, and Fitz is a very inward-looking dude (seriously).

You can read his direct quotes straight from the horses mouth.

milkman 12-14-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258173)
Cassel.

In case you missed it, Fitz seems to think that Cassel is a good QB, and his performance against the Cards did nothing to alter Fitz's thinking there.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7258193)
In case you missed it, Fitz seems to think that Cassel is a good QB, and his performance against the Cards did nothing to alter Fitz's thinking there.

You've convinced me Milk, I'm sold. Fitz to KC.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7258191)
You can read his direct quotes straight from the horses mouth.

LMAO Okay that was funny.

milkman 12-14-2010 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258196)
You've convinced me Milk, I'm sold. Fitz to KC.

I'm not selling anything.

I'm just pointing out that speculation is just that.

Larry Fitzgerald is the only one who really knows what Larry Fitzgerald is thinking.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7258200)
I'm not selling anything.

I'm just pointing out that speculation is just that.

Larry Fitzgerald is the only one who really knows what Larry Fitzgerald is thinking.

100% agreed. Only reason I even stick my nose in is because I hear a lot of talk about Fitz in a non-Chiefs capacity. What you say is true though, you don't hear much of that talk from Fitz.

The Bad Guy 12-14-2010 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258197)
LMAO Okay that was funny.

What was funny? There's nothing that forces Larry Fitzgerald to gush about Todd Haley the way he does.

If the Chiefs meet the Cardinals asking price, I highly doubt Fitzgerald is going to block such a move.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7258211)
What was funny? There's nothing that forces Larry Fitzgerald to gush about Todd Haley the way he does.

If the Chiefs meet the Cardinals asking price, I highly doubt Fitzgerald is going to block such a move.

Oh, I thought you were referring to me when you said "horse". I thought that was a pretty good one.

As to your belief that Fitz gushes man love about Haley to the point where he would want to come to a non-contender with a limp QB certainly you are entitled to your opinion.

The Bad Guy 12-14-2010 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258226)
Oh, I thought you were referring to me when you said "horse". I thought that was a pretty good one.

As to your belief that Fitz gushes man love about Haley to the point where he would want to come to a non-contender with a limp QB certainly you are entitled to your opinion.

So it's not your opinion the Chiefs are an ascending team with an improving QB?

If he's a limp QB, wouldn't someone like Fitz, who is a master at intermediate route running be a perfect fit?

CupidStunt 12-14-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258096)
Fitz has a no-trade clause.

And he's going to excerise that when the Cards come to him and say, "Hey, Larry - we've got an offer from the Chiefs, but if you don't want to go there, you can stay here and catch passes from John Skelton and help us win 4 games next year."

LMAO

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7258271)
So it's not your opinion the Chiefs are an ascending team with an improving QB?

If he's a limp QB, wouldn't someone like Fitz, who is a master at intermediate route running be a perfect fit?

My opinion is that Fitz has X amount of years left in his career and if a team like the Patriots comes calling he is more likely to go that route.
My opinion is formed in part by what I hear/read in the local market where Fitz currently plays that says Fitz has had his fill of limp QBs and wants to get back to what he had with Kurt. By no means do I think any of what I say is fact, it is only my opinion.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 7258283)
And he's going to excerise that when the Cards come to him and say, "Hey, Larry - we've got an offer from the Chiefs, but if you don't want to go there, you can stay here and catch passes from John Skelton and help us win 4 games next year."

LMAO

If Fitz opens up to trades there will be a hell of a lot more teams than KC come calling. Been around for long?

The Bad Guy 12-14-2010 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258286)
My opinion is that Fitz has X amount of years left in his career and if a team like the Patriots comes calling he is more likely to go that route.
My opinion is formed in part by what I hear/read in the local market where Fitz currently plays that says Fitz has had his fill of limp QBs and wants to get back to what he had with Kurt. By no means do I think any of what I say is fact, it is only my opinion.

And I'm of the opinion that the Patriots won't try to sign a huge money WR when they've gone back to a model that won them 3 titles with lesser WRs that fit their system.

Yeah, they have tons of picks to work with. They also need to replace some old lineman, get a dynamic RB, find a pass rusher to put at OLB and add cornerback depth.

All of those issues have to come way way before even thinking about trading for Fitzgerald.

vailpass 12-14-2010 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7258301)
And I'm of the opinion that the Patriots won't try to sign a huge money WR when they've gone back to a model that won them 3 titles with lesser WRs that fit their system.

Yeah, they have tons of picks to work with. They also need to replace some old lineman, get a dynamic RB, find a pass rusher to put at OLB and add cornerback depth.

All of those issues have to come way way before even thinking about trading for Fitzgerald.

Sorry, I was only using the Patriots as an example. I should have said 'a current (not up and coming) SB contender with a top-tier QB". Pittsburgh, Philly, NE, etc.

We have differing opinions, neither of us will know shit until Fitz is a FA or until someone trades for him.

beach tribe 12-15-2010 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7258318)
Sorry, I was only using the Patriots as an example. I should have said 'a current (not up and coming) SB contender with a top-tier QB". Pittsburgh, Philly, NE, etc.

We have differing opinions, neither of us will know shit until Fitz is a FA or until someone trades for him.

Bank on this next season.

Don't Crucify me, I'm a little rusty.
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...9/Fitz11KC.jpg

vailpass 12-15-2010 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 7260700)
Bank on this next season.

Don't Crucify me, I'm a little rusty.
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...9/Fitz11KC.jpg

?

beach tribe 12-15-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7260795)
?

My photoshop skills are rusty. That is a Chiefs Uni he's wearing.

Hootie 12-15-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 7260813)
My photoshop skills are rusty. That is a Chiefs Uni he's wearing.

he must have purchased it from one of those Chinese ripoff sites

Sofa King 12-15-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 7260813)
My photoshop skills are rusty. That is a Chiefs Uni he's wearing.

i like it...


even if those other pricks don't

vailpass 12-15-2010 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 7260813)
My photoshop skills are rusty. That is a Chiefs Uni he's wearing.

Oh, got it. Thanks. All I could see was the red x.
We'll see. Certainly stranger things have happened than a ProBowl WR choosing to go to a non-SB contender with a noodle-armed QB.

HemiEd 12-15-2010 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7260871)
Oh, got it. Thanks. All I could see was the red x.
We'll see. Certainly stranger things have happened than a ProBowl WR choosing to go to a non-SB contender with a noodle-armed QB.

Oh snap.

It looks like we are going to be seeing a bitter side of vailpass, now that the Broncos are totally in the shitter.

vailpass 12-15-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 7260949)
Oh snap.

It looks like we are going to be seeing a bitter side of vailpass, now that the Broncos are totally in the shitter.

Howdy Ed, how's your holiday seson so far?

I'm not bitter at all regarding Fitzgerald, just a little amused.

The Bad Guy 12-15-2010 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7260986)
Howdy Ed, how's your holiday seson so far?

I'm not bitter at all regarding Fitzgerald, just a little amused.

I know for a fact that Fitzgerald doesn't see Cassel as a noodle arm or as KC as a team that's not on the rise.

I think what you're doing is underestimating the immense amount of praise that Fitz has for Haley as a coach. I know people who know Fitz and they all say that it's just not media speak, that he actually considers Haley to be the most influential coach he's ever had.

InChiefsHeaven 12-15-2010 03:48 PM

Look, if the money is right, we could pick up Fitz easily. He'd like to work with Haley, has a rapport with Bowe, and I'm sure he'd be fine with Cassel. If it can be done, I'm sure it will be.

vailpass 12-15-2010 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7260993)
I know for a fact that Fitzgerald doesn't see Cassel as a noodle arm or as KC as a team that's not on the rise.

I think what you're doing is underestimating the immense amount of praise that Fitz has for Haley as a coach. I know people who know Fitz and they all say that it's just not media speak, that he actually considers Haley to be the most influential coach he's ever had.

You know that for a fact huh? When's the last time you spoke with Fitz? Don't you think you are going a little overboard here?

Hootie 12-15-2010 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7261031)
You know that for a fact huh? When's the last time you spoke with Fitz? Don't you think you are going a little overboard here?

well at least we're not the talentless Broncos led by Tim Tebow

vailpass 12-15-2010 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7261059)
well at least we're not the talentless Broncos led by Tim Tebow

Good one Hootie.

I'm the rubber and your the glue
It bounces off me and sticks to you!!!

Hootie 12-15-2010 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7261067)
Good one Hootie.

I'm the rubber and your the glue
It bounces off me and sticks to you!!!

TIM TIM TEBOW

have fun with your 10 wins in the next 3 years...

it's really fun, I know from experience

The Bad Guy 12-15-2010 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7261031)
You know that for a fact huh? When's the last time you spoke with Fitz? Don't you think you are going a little overboard here?

Yes, for a fact. I haven't talked to Fitz directly, but I'm pretty close to people who have and I have no reason to believe they would lie to me about things I never even asked them to inquire about.

vailpass 12-15-2010 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7261089)
Yes, for a fact. I haven't talked to Fitz directly, but I'm pretty close to people who have and I have no reason to believe they would lie to me about things I never even asked them to inquire about.

LMAO

The Bad Guy 12-15-2010 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7261100)
LMAO

I really don't have dick to prove to you so you can chose to believe what you want. Your BS assertions that Fitz wouldn't play for a) a QB like Cassel because of a "noodle arm" even though Fitz isn't a deep threat, and B) this Chiefs team would not be a contender with Fitz are really the only laughable statements in this thread.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.