![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Darren Smith on Twitter
People seem to forget when the #Chiefs had like $2.73 to their name in the form of cap space in 2019 yet somehow found a way to sign Patrick Mahomes to a ten-year, $450 million dollar contract extension. If Veach and the Chiefs (ie, Mahomes) want D-Hop, they can make it happen. |
if we get Lord Nuk i'm flooding the internet with Darth Reidius GIFs
https://media.tenor.com/uRA09XxmhJIAAAAC/darth-maul.gif |
DHop said he wants to play with Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, Herbert or Hurts.
Ravens already paid a ton of money to OBJ, drafted Flowers with their first rounder and have another former 1st rounder in Bateman Chargers have Mike Williams, Keenan Allen and first rounder Q Johnston. Eagles have AJ Brown and Devonta Smith. Are any of those teams really going to pony up north of $15M for DHop? It will be Chiefs or Bills IMO. If I remember correctly the Bills 2024 cap is already wrecked. We will see if Buf wants to offer DHop an incentive laden contract which would hurt their 2024 cap even more. |
Quote:
Why is a 31 year-old WR, that necessarily takes fewer hits, and has to play a less physical style of play more of a liability than a 34 year-old TE, that has to play a much more physical game? That just doesn't make any sense to me. And our WRs going into the season are likely (Hopkins) Toney Moore MVS Rice Do we really care how many balls the rest of the WR room catches? And Hopkins isn't a volume WR. he doesn't need 150 targets to be productive. He's literally one of the few WRs in history to see over 100 targets and catch every single ball in a season. he's incredibly efficient; if you have a QB that can actually put the ball somewhere he can get a hand on it. In this offense, he needs between 80-100 targets. With Pat throwing to him, he'll catch 70-85 balls for over 1,200 yds/8-10 TDs. Btw, if he does anything like that, then even Travis doesn't need 150 targets. More like 120-130. Quid pro quo: Plenty of balls for Toney/Moore/Rice. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Biggest issue for Dhop is whether someone gives him a multi year deal for stupid money or he wants to win a ring. I suspect the Chiefs won’t offer enough (absent Mahomes insistence). They will likely take the same kind of $3mm-$5mm with another $8mm-$10mm in incentives sort of deal that Juju took, but if he wants to go to the highest bidder — even if it’s just the highest bidder among the handful of teams he’s expressed an interest playing for — then he won’t be in KC.
I think KC believes they’re in good shape with the current cast as well — making a pursuit of Hopkins even less likely. |
Current Chiefs WRs 2022 total yards
MVS 687 James 569 Watson 315 Moore 250 Toney 171 Rice 0 Ross 0 Ross 0 ...we could use the help. Hopkins will want at least $15m to match OBJ, probably more. Apparently, we can get $16m by extending Chris Jones and we have $1m currently available. |
Quote:
Gage's cap hit in 2023 is $7m to MVS's $9m. Gage also had 51 receptions on 70 targets for 5 TDs. MVS had 42 receptions on 81 targets with 2TD last season. Coming into their respective contracts... MVS put up 430 yards on 26 receptions off 55 with 3 TDs targets while Gage put up 770 yards on 66 receptions off 94 targets and 4TDs. With Gage coming up on a $16m payday next season due to the way that 3-30 contract was written up... I would be shocked if he is still with the Bucs next season. 7m > 9m |
Quote:
|
Quote:
MVS had 5 drops (6.2% Drop Rate). Kelce had 8 (5.3% Drop Rate). Not saying he doesn't drop the ball, but just wanting to have honest information. I don't think MVS is as negative as you make him out to be, as he showed in the AFC Championship game that he can fill the other facets of this offense if he has to, plus he very much fulfills his role. If he didn't have some concerns in dropping the ball and had an extra step in his lateral movement, he'd be a lot better player (but he'd also cost an additional 6 to 10M AAV) Plus, it's important to remember that he was literally our 2nd option at receiver last year (so realistically 3rd behind Kelce) and got 687 yards. Lets look at some beautiful data: He was 55th in yards amongst all pass catchers (46th amongst Wide Receivers only), making him an average WR2 in the grand scheme of things, in an offense where realistically he is the 3rd option (if we go off of qualified players in Receiving Yds per game he fares a bit worse at 68th, or the 55th Wide Receiver making him an average WR2 option or a top 3rd pass catcher) So lets run with his worse set of numbers, looking at guys around him in terms of production output last year (In terms of Yards per game), we see veteran receivers like Corey Davis (62nd), Mack Hollins (66th), Curtis Samuel (71st). If we include other pass catchers we also add Zach Ertz (67th), Dalton Schultz (72nd) and Tyler Higbee (76th) Lets look at salaries... Corey Davis 12.5M AAV Mack Hollins Vet Minimum, had no other season historically over 223 yards Curtis Samuel 11.5M AAV Zach Ertz 10.5M AAV, Tight End signed 2022 (Same year as MVS) Dalton Schultz Rookie Deal, was playing on 5th year Option @ 10.9M, Tight End Tyler Higbee 7.25M AAV, Tight End signed 2019 MVS 10M AAV. For comparative production from a WR, MVS actually cost comparatively than the veteran receivers around his production. Not a great deal by any means, but not the albatross that you're making it out to be. In fact, one could claim compared to those counterparts on that list and the fact their contracts were written before the Christian Kirk contract and before MVS contract, one could claim that his contract is cheaper than it should be. I'm not going to argue that, but it's not an albatross and he's not awful like you're attempting to make him out to be. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Would we rather have WR Deandre Hopkins or DE Yannick Ngakoue for 2/3rd - 1/2 the price or maybe NT Ndamukong Suh?
Hopkins would be our best WR, Ngakoue would be our best edge rusher, Ndamukong Suh would be our best NT... by a mile. Some good options still out there for sure. |
Quote:
I can see going either way, however The KC DL is good enough to win a SB. The WR room is a bag of ? marks and MVS. |
Quote:
|
No one will sign him until after the 4th of July. Too strong of a possibility someone mistakes him for a turtle. Then shove am M80 up his butt
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also does he not get any money from the Cardinals now? They have a dead cap hit, but none of that goes to Hopkins correct?
|
Quote:
|
You'll breed thankful for the information when he has another bird on his helmet
|
Quote:
Second, we signed MVS in the third wave of FA because we had traded Hill and needed to re-tool the WR room. We didn’t have a surplus of options. Third, you’re not even looking at contracts in a remotely sensible or comparable way. Both MVS and Gage signed for 3/30mm. MVS got 8.5mm at signing and then 6.5mm if on the roster for 2023. Total 15mm at 7.5mm/yr for 2yrs or 8.5mm/1yr. Gage got 15mm at signing and then 5mm if on the roster for 2023. Total 20mm at 10mm/yr for 2yrs or 15mm/1yr. If a 1yr deal, 8.5 < 15. If a 2yr deal, 7.5 < 10. Happy to see the value we got with MVS? |
Quote:
Lol, like somehow it was Hopkins fault that he was the only option. Wildly silly take. "JJSS was targeted only 5 more times than Hopkins, but he played in 16 games and not 9." JJSS had the best QB in history throwing to him, entirely 1v1 all season. DH had three of the worst QBs in the league throwing to him, and yes, they force-fed him the ball because no one else proved to be reliable enough to count on. And yet, even doubled for much of the season, he still caught 64 balls for 717 yards. It took JJSS 16 games to accumulate a less than stellar 933 yards, and managed just a measly 2 TDs, with Mahomes throwing him open, in Andy's scheme. If DH had played the 6 suspended games (15 total games), he projected to eclipse 1,200 yards, even with those shitty QBs struggling to get him the ball. Gee, I wonder what Hopkins could've done if he'd had a good QB throwing the ball?:hmmm: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Super stupid, sure...but BEP level of stupidity? |
Quote:
Quote:
Career catch %: Corey Davis (team with losing record) - 59.2 Mack Hollins (team with losing record) - 58.9 Curtis Samuel (team with losing record) - 64.7 Zach Ertz (TE on team with losing record) - 67 Dalton Schultz (TE on team with winning record but still on rookie deal) - 70.1 Tyler Higbee (TE on a team with a losing record) - 68 MVS (#2 WR on a SB winning squad with GOD as his QB) - 50.3 (51.9 with Mahomes) I get it... this is one stat of many but it is, arguably, one of the most important stats for a receiver. How often does he catch the balls thrown to him. Perhaps saying he is overpaid is an exaggeration. How about we leave it at I just don't trust him as anything other than a 4th option. I have more faith in Kelce/Rice/McKinnon as the first 3 receiving options than I do MVS. I want to eat crow. I hope be balls out and you all get to quote me for the next 5 years on this. I never want our players to fail but I'm not gonna put on rose colored glasses regarding players solely because they wear our logo. I hope you all see something in him that I'm missing but he seems like a whole lot of meh. |
someone is gonna give him a pretty large deal you would think but maybe not. It would be nice if he just wanted to come get a ring but his window for getting big contracts is closing fast so I would imagine he's going where the money is.
|
Quote:
Change the 100% to like, 30% or so and the Gif will be normal size rather than gigantamus. (Credit to one of hte mods for showing me that. Either Bearcat or Bowser i dont recall which). |
We have no money and we have invested in young wrs. Unless it guranteed another title we should pass becuae it doesn't.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’d like to see it, even though the WR room is already overcrowded. But I’m guessing he goes to the Bills. They’ll find a way to overpay him, as another desperate attempt to strike while the iron’s hot. |
Quote:
His money is already set. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We sign this dreadlock muther****er yet?
|
Quote:
|
Still a lot of vets on the junk pile this offseason.
Someone will pick up the scraps. Wonder too about Julio Jones. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
/shrug. Idk, whatever.
|
Quote:
|
did we sign this piece of shit yet?
|
The money is *really* on Buffalo with us second:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Where will DeAndre Hopkins play game 1 of the 2023/24 NFL season?<br><br>Buffalo Bills +110<br>Kansas City Chiefs +300<br>New England Patriots +300<br>Chicago Bears +550<br>Carolina Panthers +550<br>Detroit Lions +750<a href="https://t.co/xw6fkbAjwp">pic.twitter.com/xw6fkbAjwp</a></p>— Odds Shark (@OddsShark) <a href="https://twitter.com/OddsShark/status/1662150693518442509?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 26, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I guess it was an exaggeration to say he is overpaid when compared to others. Every dude in the NFL is there because they can play the game. Him going off in the AFCCG was phenomenal and I'm grateful. Do I trust him as an effective receiver all season long? No. MVS is Demarcus Robinson with a lower catch % and WAY more expensive. The Patriots have JuJu as their #2/slot guy for less than we have MVS as a 4th option. |
Wonder where we will land on. Good luck to DeAndre!
|
Quote:
The guarantees are generally already paid they just accelerate onto the cap if you had them spread over several years. Either way Hopkins waaya top 3 paid WR during his time in Arizona and has made 111 million over his career. |
Quote:
It’s okay to not love MVS. He’s not great. He has flaws. But he plays a role in this offense and comparing a player who leads the league in average depth of target annually with other receivers like Demarcus Robinson is missing the point. |
Adding to post count
|
He was spotted at KCI……obligatory post
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...d10725c8f6.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
So in that sense, it makes sense that they weren't willing to eat any of his salary to facilitate a trade. It would have cost them more in dead cap just to get a mid pick back. Quote:
But the cards are not paying him 21 mil this year. Not how that works. |
Quote:
Did I “tap out” or did I concede a point like a rational human does when shown they have misspoke via exaggeration? As for by leading the league in average depth of target… what does that actually mean when his catch % is, on average, 10% lower to that of other players being paid in the same range? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So what’s the latest smoke
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And you made an exaggerated claim, realized you were incorrect, and tapped out. It’s like telling me that MVS is getting paid more than JuJu. As for average depth of target and catch percentage, do you think you should be comparing a guy who is regularly targeted, say, 5-10yds downfield with a guy who is targeted 15-20yds downfield? Do you think catches per target should be equal between the two of them? No. Hence, the guy who leads the league in ADoT should be expected to have a somewhat lower catch percentage. |
Becoming Knowmo is happening!
|
Quote:
Wanna sign for cheap, collect your Cards money, win a ring, and cash in? Sure, welcome. Want a big contract? Nope. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for JuJu... https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/new-engl...chuster-21804/ Current Contract JuJu Smith-Schuster signed a 3 year, $25,500,000 contract with the New England Patriots, including a $7,900,000 signing bonus, $16,000,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $8,500,000. In 2023, Smith-Schuster will earn a base salary of $1,100,000 and a signing bonus of $7,900,000, while carrying a cap hit of $4,674,509 and a dead cap value of $16,000,000. Though on other searches it says a 3/33 contract. Based on sportrac... it seems that Juju had/has a 3/25.5 contract to MVS's 3/30 which is what I was basing my argument about his current contract on. Quote:
Cheers! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Did we sign this pos yet?
|
We did the motorcycle wave as he flew east
|
if it helps the team, I’ll lease my Leawood summer house to him below market.
|
Let Bart Vatch know I’ll pay part of his salary if necessary.
|
I’ll put the chances of us signing Hopkins at less than 30%. We’ve already made moves to fill the roles needed in the offense, haven’t we?
I can definitely see immediate surplus value of a HOFer like Hopkins around all these younger players for a year, but these young guys need to play to improve so with his age a 1 year contract might be a perfect fit for both sides. He could win a ring and retire if he wanted to. |
Yes. Odds say explore weaknesses. Instead of setting up a fluffy tail between the legs
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.