ChiefsPlanet
Page 61 of 83 « First 115157585960 61 6263646571 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Mizzou Basketball (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255770)

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440762)
The only team they really struggled with was KSU....they had our number. We were in both games with KU so you can't say we struggled. If we had lost by 15 then I could buy your assertion.
They did struggle for a significant period vs. KU but not even close to as much against KSU. I'm not sure what it is that Frank Martin and his players did to make MU uncomfortable, but you can bet other teams will be watching those games.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440735)
The part I find interesting is that you assert that KU can survive a bad shooting night. But frankly I don't agree.....can they do it better than MU because they have Robinson down low? Sure...but what happens if Robinson's malaise play like he had in the tourney continues? Then all you become is a lesser version of MU.

One thing I want to see is if Robinson's style of play gets him more fouls in the tourney. I could see an official from a conference that plays a finesse style call more fouls on Robinson....and if that happens you guys are screwed. Withey folds like a wet cardboard box when challenged (see both MU games for examples) and you have no one else down low.

What if the Tyshawn Taylor that throws the ball away and plays uncontrolled shows up again? And Elijah Johnson? Do you really want to rely on him? He is as up and down as a teeter-totter.

I can see MU's warts....and acknowledge that a team with power on the blocks is trouble for them. And all it takes is an injury/foul trouble to put MU in trouble.
I know KU can survive a bad shooting night because I've seen them do it many times... and stats-wise, they're in the top 10 of adjusted offense & defense in kenpom. Of course, they could shoot poorly and lose in the first weekend, but Self teams have also beaten teams like Southern Illinois and Davidson in the tournament before, and this year they've won games while shooting under 40% and shooting piss-poor from 3. Yes, depth is an issue... TRob and Taylor need to play well and stay on the floor, and they obviously can't rely on their bench that was like 390th in the country in points.

As far as MU being able to grind it out and win, like I said, I haven't watched enough to really know, but I haven't seen them do it. :shrug:

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440761)
They probably lose. But he doesn't play defense at all, so he really shouldn't get into foul trouble. If he does, it will have been because he made a few stupid plays.
So what happens when you get a team that is strong down low. Do you go right at Robinson and get him in foul trouble? Make him play defense and wear him down?

KU's problems are what I outlined in my post to Bearcat.....you have TT who you never know which version is going to show up, just like we have with Dixon. Elijah Johnson can have a great game then a lame game. It doesn't take much to get inside Withey's head....just look at what English did to him, or even Baylor.

I see as many areas of need in KU as I do MU.

eazyb81 03-11-2012 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440774)
They did struggle for a significant period vs. KU but not even close to as much against KSU. I'm not sure what it is that Frank Martin and his players did to make MU uncomfortable, but you can bet other teams will be watching those games.
If it was that easy to just watch what the Ecokats did to us and copy it, we wouldn't have won 17 Big 12 games. KSU clearly has an edge in terms of personnel and style that works well against some teams and doesn't against others. At this point in the season, it's extremely difficult for a team to just alter their style for an opponent like you are suggesting.

If Mizzou plays a team with a big, deep, and physical front line, they could be in trouble. But we've known that since November.

beer bacon 03-11-2012 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440762)
The only team they really struggled with was KSU....they had our number. We were in both games with KU so you can't say we struggled. If we had lost by 15 then I could buy your assertion.
We shot 49% combined in the two games against KU.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 02:12 PM
#2 in the Midwest has a good feel to it for Mizzou. They get St. Louis, and they get to keep the chip on their shoulder for even more motivation, although Haith has done a great job getting them to show up, especially after the tough loss in AFH, so I don't think Mizzou needs any more motivation.

Kentucky showed it can lose today. I don't have a problem with being in Kentucky's region...it is what it is. Mizzou earned the Midwest region with their dominant conference tourney, so let's see what happens.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 02:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8440781)
I know KU can survive a bad shooting night because I've seen them do it many times... and stats-wise, they're in the top 10 of adjusted offense & defense in kenpom. Of course, they could shoot poorly and lose in the first weekend, but Self teams have also beaten teams like Southern Illinois and Davidson in the tournament before, and this year they've won games while shooting under 40% and shooting piss-poor from 3. Yes, depth is an issue... TRob and Taylor need to play well and stay on the floor, and they obviously can't rely on their bench that was like 390th in the country in points.

As far as MU being able to grind it out and win, like I said, I haven't watched enough to really know, but I haven't seen them do it. :shrug:
The thing is....even when our best guy has bad nights, another can step up and fill in. We have Pressey, Dixon and English each step up when Denmon has a bad night. But how many 'bad" nights did he really have? Even on a night when he was still nursing a bad ankle he scored 15 on a good Baylor team...

They say when you get into the tourney it is the Senior leadership that carries a team when things are on the line. I would put our Senior group up against any in the land.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 02:14 PM
Mizzou has senior leadership and great guard play. Those are two very important ingredients to a great tourney run, and a reason to get excited for Tigers fans.

There are more KU fans posting in here than in the KU basketball thread....interesting.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8440803)
#2 in the Midwest has a good feel to it for Mizzou. They get St. Louis, and they get to keep the chip on their shoulder for even more motivation, although Haith has done a great job getting them to show up, especially after the tough loss in AFH, so I don't think Mizzou needs any more motivation.

Kentucky showed it can lose today. I don't have a problem with being in Kentucky's region...it is what it is. Mizzou earned the Midwest region with their dominant conference tourney, so let's see what happens.
I was thinking KU would get the 4th #1 in Phoenix and Mizzou would get the 1st #2 in St. Louis, but if neither gets a #1, I don't know what will happen.... Lunardi has them both as 2s (just now showing it on espn), but didn't have them placed in regions.

beer bacon 03-11-2012 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8440813)
Mizzou has senior leadership and great guard play. Those are two very important ingredients to a great tourney run, and a reason to get excited for Tigers fans.

There are more KU fans posting in here than in the KU basketball thread....interesting.
We also hit our free throws, unlike other teams to the west.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 02:17 PM
Dan Dakich just said he thinks the wings for KU are suspect....

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8440817)
I was thinking KU would get the 4th #1 in Phoenix and Mizzou would get the 1st #2 in St. Louis, but if neither gets a #1, I don't know what will happen.... Lunardi has them both as 2s (just now showing it on espn), but didn't have them placed in regions.
Bracketology on the web has Mizzou #2 in St. Louis and KU #2 in Phoenix.

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

Bearcat 03-11-2012 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440807)
The thing is....even when our best guy has bad nights, another can step up and fill in. We have Pressey, Dixon and English each step up when Denmon has a bad night. But how many 'bad" nights did he really have? Even on a night when he was still nursing a bad ankle he scored 15 on a good Baylor team...

They say when you get into the tourney it is the Senior leadership that carries a team when things are on the line. I would put our Senior group up against any in the land.
Good point, when you're the top offense in the country, you obviously don't have to worry about a bad shooting night very often... it's all about matchups. Unfortunately, for anyone who likes it when teams score more than 50 points, there are so many Big 10 teams and other teams that grind it out, it's almost unavoidable that a team will be tested in an ugly game.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8440813)
Mizzou has senior leadership and great guard play. Those are two very important ingredients to a great tourney run, and a reason to get excited for Tigers fans.

There are more KU fans posting in here than in the KU basketball thread....interesting.
Yeah, KU fans are willing to talk about someone other than themselves. :p

eazyb81 03-11-2012 02:21 PM
LOL, Gottlieb saying ku will get overseeded due to the name on their jersey like Duke.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 02:21 PM
Interesting...the ESPN crew just said that the teams with the best chance to make the Final Four form the Big 12 are (in this order)

MU
Baylor
KU

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440783)
So what happens when you get a team that is strong down low. Do you go right at Robinson and get him in foul trouble? Make him play defense and wear him down?

KU's problems are what I outlined in my post to Bearcat.....you have TT who you never know which version is going to show up, just like we have with Dixon. Elijah Johnson can have a great game then a lame game. It doesn't take much to get inside Withey's head....just look at what English did to him, or even Baylor.

I see as many areas of need in KU as I do MU.
How well KU plays really comes down to how well TRob and Tyshawn play. They're the two best players on the team and two of the best players in the NCAA. If you can knock one of them out of a game for a period, it would obviously hurt. He's learned to avoid that over the course of this season, though.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440831)
Interesting...the ESPN crew just said that the teams with the best chance to make the Final Four form the Big 12 are (in this order)

MU
Baylor
KU
ESPN has loved Baylor all year... they talk about KU and MU plenty, but it seemed to take them most of the conference season to figure out they might be soft and poorly coached.

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8440813)
Mizzou has senior leadership and great guard play. Those are two very important ingredients to a great tourney run, and a reason to get excited for Tigers fans.

There are more KU fans posting in here than in the KU basketball thread....interesting.
I'm a basketball fan. Basketball is being discussed in this thread, not the other one. I fail to see the problem.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440840)
I'm a basketball fan. Basketball is being discussed in this thread, not the other one. I fail to see the problem.
Don't see a problem at all KCC. Just thought it was interesting that there is more talk about Mizzou bball this afternoon than KU. Just an observation.

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440831)
Interesting...the ESPN crew just said that the teams with the best chance to make the Final Four form the Big 12 are (in this order)

MU
Baylor
KU
For a team that won one of the best conferences in the nation by two games and finished the season 9-1, KU hasn't been getting much pub. over the last few days (seemingly because of the Baylor loss).

Honestly, maybe it's better that way for them. It's not like having all the press in the world the last two years helped at all. They didn't get much in the championship year either, ESPN was all over UNC and Memphis.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8440829)
Good point, when you're the top offense in the country, you obviously don't have to worry about a bad shooting night very often... it's all about matchups. Unfortunately, for anyone who likes it when teams score more than 50 points, there are so many Big 10 teams and other teams that grind it out, it's almost unavoidable that a team will be tested in an ugly game.
I've seen the B1G all this season and outside of OSU and MSU I'm not impressed....plus when it comes to tourney time they usually struggle when they don't get to bang inside like they are used to doing.

Messier 03-11-2012 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8440773)
Don't put words in my mouth just because you have no idea what you're talking about. I never predicted Mizzou would be a 1 seed because I have no idea what the committee will do. But I can absolutely see a scenario where Mizzou gets the 1 seed in the Midwest. That's it.

The committee tries to give the top 4 seeds an advantage in terms of geography, but it doesn't work perfectly according to the S-curve every time. If a choice comes down to having two top seed fanbases having to travel extensively or just one fanbase, they could opt for just one, like shipping UNC out to Phoenix.

How am I putting words in your mouth? It appeared you questioned MU being the last 1 if they were a 1 at all, I was responding to that, I guess that's not what you were implying. I don't think they will be a 1 either, neither will KU. Just my opinion, I don't know this. (Thought I'd save you the trouble of saying that in advance)

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8440854)
Don't see a problem at all KCC. Just thought it was interesting that there is more talk about Mizzou bball this afternoon than KU. Just an observation.
MU fans are way more excited about their team at the moment.

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8440830)
LOL, Gottlieb saying ku will get overseeded due to the name on their jersey like Duke.
They're going to end up as a 2...that's not overseeded at all.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440865)
MU fans are way more excited about their team at the moment.
I can see that, since Mizzou's players cared about playing their best this weekend.

Bowser 03-11-2012 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440869)
They're going to end up as a 2...that's not overseeded at all.
Who are the ones, iyo?

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8440839)
ESPN has loved Baylor all year... they talk about KU and MU plenty, but it seemed to take them most of the conference season to figure out they might be soft and poorly coached.
I still think Baylor is over rated.....and coaching is the reason. I think the talent is there, and with any other coach they would be on par with Kentucky.

But the fact that MU and KU have pretty much owned them all year makes me feel they are suspect. You can bet everyone is watching how MU and KU handled Baylor and will game plan accordingly.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440883)
I still think Baylor is over rated.....and coaching is the reason. I think the talent is there, and with any other coach they would be on par with Kentucky.

But the fact that MU and KU have pretty much owned them all year makes me feel they are suspect. You can bet everyone is watching how MU and KU handled Baylor and will game plan accordingly.
It depends on which Baylor team shows up....and that can be directly related to coaching. The Baylor team that played KU on Friday, and demolished their way through the non-con can play with anyone. The team that lost to Mizzou 3 times and was blown out by KU twice, not so much.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440865)
MU fans are way more excited about their team at the moment.
Would you agree we have good reason to be?

petegz28 03-11-2012 02:33 PM
KU and MU likely both to get #2's

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8440882)
Who are the ones, iyo?
I think it should be UK, Cuse, UNC, and the winner of this B10 game. There's a possibility that KU could end up as the last #1, but I don't think it's likely nor do I think they really deserve it.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440883)
I still think Baylor is over rated.....and coaching is the reason. I think the talent is there, and with any other coach they would be on par with Kentucky.

But the fact that MU and KU have pretty much owned them all year makes me feel they are suspect. You can bet everyone is watching how MU and KU handled Baylor and will game plan accordingly.
Baylor didn't back down this weekend, which might have been the most surprising part of the tournament... I was watching hockey while they played Missouri yesterday, but from what I saw, they kept MU within striking distance for most of the game and got it close several times. Hard to say if they'll stay motivated when they're playing some random 6 seed in the 2nd round that comes out and punches them in the mouth, but yeah, I still wouldn't bet on them to make it very far.

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440896)
Would you agree we have good reason to be?
I think KU fans have just as much reason to be excited. They're just as good as anybody not named Kentucky and have played great over the last few months. Many, for whatever reason, though, are looking at the Baylor loss as if its a harbinger of things to come rather than the single, lesser game that it was.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8440910)
Baylor didn't back down this weekend, which might have been the most surprising part of the tournament... I was watching hockey while they played Missouri yesterday, but from what I saw, they kept MU within striking distance for most of the game and got it close several times. Hard to say if they'll stay motivated when they're playing some random 6 seed in the 2nd round that comes out and punches them in the mouth, but yeah, I still wouldn't bet on them to make it very far.
I would not bet on Baylor with a ten foot pool. Way too inconsistent. They could pound a lot of teams, and they could just as easily not show up and lose to a #14 seed in the first round.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 02:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 8440897)
KU and MU likely both to get #2's
Yeah, and I wouldn't be surprised if one goes to St. Louis or neither do... if they made the loser of the Big 10 game the top #2, they would go to St. Louis. Since they tied for the regular season and are playing in the championship game, as opposed to KU winning the regular season by 2 games and MU winning the tourney, I don't think it's out of the question.

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:41 PM
If St. Louis means being in Kentucky's region, I'll pass on that "opportunity."

KC_Connection 03-11-2012 02:44 PM
Baylor's beaten every inferior team they've played this year except for KSU at home, so I would be a bit surprised if they lost early. It's when they play big games that they fail and get rattled (outside of Friday).

Bearcat 03-11-2012 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440911)
I think KU fans have just as much reason to be excited. They're just as good as anybody not named Kentucky and have played great over the last few months. Many, for whatever reason, though, are looking at the Baylor loss as if its a harbinger of things to come rather than the single, lesser game that it was.
Yeah, it always happens... "if they keep playing like this"... I'm pretty 'meh' about the whole thing just because I'm not surprised at anything, and I know KU can lose in Omaha or in New Orleans (not my first rodeo)... so, I'm not going to act like KU deserves a higher seed than MU or whoever else, or get my hopes up outside of the 2 hours each day they play.

eazyb81 03-11-2012 03:15 PM
About 1200 fans already at Mizzou Arena for the selection show. People are still rolling in with about 45 minutes to go.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 03:32 PM
Less than 30 minutes away....

Michigan State wins the Big 10....according to Lunardi, they will be #1 out west. Hopefully Lunardi is right and Mizzou gets the #2 in the midwest.

Bowser 03-11-2012 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8441135)
Less than 30 minutes away....

Michigan State wins the Big 10....according to Lunardi, they will be #1 out west. Hopefully Lunardi is right and Mizzou gets the #2 in the midwest.
I'd take it.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-11-2012 03:35 PM
Has Missouri ever been a #1 seed?

eazyb81 03-11-2012 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8441145)
Has Missouri ever been a #1 seed?
Yes.

eazyb81 03-11-2012 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8441135)
Less than 30 minutes away....

Michigan State wins the Big 10....according to Lunardi, they will be #1 out west. Hopefully Lunardi is right and Mizzou gets the #2 in the midwest.
I hope MSU is the #1 in the Midwest and we are the #2.

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8441145)
Has Missouri ever been a #1 seed?
#1 in the West in 94. Undefeated in the Big 8 regular season that year. Made the elite eight.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8441145)
Has Missouri ever been a #1 seed?
1994

mnchiefsguy 03-11-2012 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8441154)
I hope MSU is the #1 in the Midwest and we are the #2.
Kentucky will be the #1 in the midwest I think.

Saul Good 03-11-2012 03:47 PM
Here's the funny thing. If the ref doesn't call a phantom foul at the end of regulation in Lawrence, Mizzou is 31-3. We are probably the #3 seed overall.

Instead, we're the seventh best team.

What a joke.

Football is king, and it should be. I hope we win the whole ****ing thing in basketball, but it's still basketball.

Captain Obvious 03-11-2012 03:48 PM
Frank Haith looking like a pimp on CBS right now.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8441215)
Here's the funny thing. If the ref doesn't call a phantom foul at the end of regulation in Lawrence, Mizzou is 31-3. We are probably the #3 seed overall.

Instead, we're the seventh best team.

What a joke.

Football is king, and it should be. I hope we win the whole ****ing thing in basketball, but it's still basketball.
At least wait until they're announced as a #2 in Atlanta or something... LMAO

Messier 03-11-2012 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8441215)
Here's the funny thing. If the ref doesn't call a phantom foul at the end of regulation in Lawrence, Mizzou is 31-3. We are probably the #3 seed overall.

Instead, we're the seventh best team.

What a joke.

Football is king, and it should be. I hope we win the whole ****ing thing in basketball, but it's still basketball.
Yep. Refs decided the game at Lawrence, as well as at Colombia. What can you do?

KcMizzou 03-11-2012 03:56 PM
Gabe DeArmond ‏ @GabeDeArmond

Haith: "It's been a special year. There's no question it's been a tremendous run. But there's no doubt, these guys want more." #Mizzou

Gabe DeArmond ‏ @GabeDeArmond

Haith tells crowd, "Whether we're one seed, two seed, three seed, in St. Louis or Arizona doesn't matter. Let's go win a championship."

Bowser 03-11-2012 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8441285)
Gabe DeArmond ‏ @GabeDeArmond

Haith: "It's been a special year. There's no question it's been a tremendous run. But there's no doubt, these guys want more." #Mizzou

Gabe DeArmond ‏ @GabeDeArmond

Haith tells crowd, "Whether we're one seed, two seed, three seed, in St. Louis or Arizona doesn't matter. Let's go win a championship."
I like it.

kcpasco 03-11-2012 04:05 PM
Kentucky got the South. Hopefully we get 2 in Midwest.

kcpasco 03-11-2012 04:06 PM
I think we could give Carolina a good game.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 04:08 PM
I'm concerned that they will give KU the game in STL

eazyb81 03-11-2012 04:09 PM
Hoping for the 2 seed against either UNC or MSU.

eazyb81 03-11-2012 04:12 PM
Thank God we didn't get the 2 seed in UK's South region.

Three7s 03-11-2012 04:15 PM
Did that guy really just say S Dakota ST would beat Baylor? rofl....

kcpasco 03-11-2012 04:17 PM
Interesting to see if MU or KU gets the Midwest. I doubt either gets put in the east.

Rams Fan 03-11-2012 04:20 PM
#2 in the West.

stonedstooge 03-11-2012 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbucks Fan (Post 8441433)
#2 in the West.
That mean they are the highest 2 seed?

kcpasco 03-11-2012 04:23 PM
Florida could be a tuff matchup

Braincase 03-11-2012 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 8441442)
That mean they are the highest 2 seed?
Looks that way. MSU would have to be considered the weakest #1.

stonedstooge 03-11-2012 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 8441453)
Looks that way. MSU would have to be considered the weakest #1.
Thanks. I don't get too much into the seeding stuff

Bearcat 03-11-2012 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 8441442)
That mean they are the highest 2 seed?
Not sure, it's kind of screwy with MSU and NCU both getting shipped... the Midwest #2 could be the top #2, since they would have regional preference (OSU or KU).

TruTV will explain it all at 6 ct.

Braincase 03-11-2012 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 8441459)
Thanks. I don't get too much into the seeding stuff
By your handle, I would assume seeds would be something you'd prefer to avoid.

stonedstooge 03-11-2012 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8441461)
Not sure, it's kind of screwy with MSU and NCU both getting shipped... the Midwest #2 could be the top #2, since they would have regional preference (OSU or KU).

TruTV will explain it all at 6 ct.
Thanks

Braincase 03-11-2012 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 8441452)
Florida could be a tuff matchup
Yep. A little "welcome to the SEC" party.

stonedstooge 03-11-2012 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 8441468)
By your handle, I would assume seeds would be something you'd prefer to avoid.
ROFL. Only for medicinal purposes man. Got the Peyton Manning neck

Braincase 03-11-2012 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 8441473)
ROFL. Only for medicinal purposes man. Got the Peyton Manning neck
No worries. I used to incinerate plenty of herbs back in the day.

kcpasco 03-11-2012 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 8441472)
Yep. A little "welcome to the SEC" party.
Yep. I'd rather play Michigan St. then Florida. It's all about matchups for Mizzou.

Dartgod 03-11-2012 04:30 PM
Looks like KU gets to lose yet another game in Missouri.

stonedstooge 03-11-2012 04:44 PM
Norfolk State next in line. One at a time

ArrowheadHawk 03-11-2012 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 8441494)
Looks like KU gets to lose yet another game in Missouri.
Well that's better than losing a game in Nebraska.

Lono 03-11-2012 04:53 PM
Mu, the 8th best team? That's a joke.

KcMizzou 03-11-2012 04:53 PM
Dennis Dodd ‏ @dennisdoddcbs

OK, Bill Self/Frank Haith, is Omaha a Kansas or Missouri town?



Sam Mellinger ‏ @mellinger

I'll be in Omaha writing about both #KUbball and #Mizzou. @kentbabb'll be there to cover the bar fights.

Captain Obvious 03-11-2012 04:53 PM
Wow, Missouri was the last 2 seed. That's hilarious.

KcMizzou 03-11-2012 04:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lono (Post 8441639)
Mu, the 8th best team? That's a joke.
5th

Edit: Wait, what?

DJay23 03-11-2012 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Obvious (Post 8441644)
Wow, Missouri was the last 2 seed. That's hilarious.
Citing the non con SOS.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM.
Page 61 of 83 « First 115157585960 61 6263646571 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.