It didn't seem to matter to Fox Sports, and of course Mike Slive decided to partner with the Big 12 afterwards anyway so the only people still whining about this are the Mizzouchebags.

I'm sure the gap won't be widening at all with the advent of the SEC Network next year.

Why wouldn't Slive set up bowls with the Big 12? It's been a decade since a Big 12 team won the Cotton Bowl.

Big 12 co-champion against the fifth place SEC team? 28 point win for the SEC.

Are you just parroting what you read on Mizzou boards or do you actually know the numbers?

Of course. It's still going to be a good football league w/ a good product when OU and Tx are up which is more years than not.

This year is a worst case scenario for the Big 12 and highlights on the field how expansion has hurt the league depth wise when it's cowbells aren't up.

Seems like you're the only one here who spends time on Mizzou boards.

So that's a no. I suspected as much.

So.......you think the SEC schools will be making less money with the new network than they are now?

Wofford
Buffalo
Louisiana Monroe
West Virginia
KSU
Iowa State
Kansas (this week)

Wow

Their opponents have more losses to FCS schools than wins against BCS schools.

LOL @ anyone associated w/ Bill Simmons trying to talk to me about college football.

There's like 4-5 guys at the 4 letter that know enough about the sport to listen to & the rest are pro sports honks that babble off box scores & casual perception devoid of insight.

His 90210 podcast is legendary though. Pure gold.

Interesting. I would have thought losing 38-0 to Maryland would have been more damaging than losing by 31 to Baylor. I mean...at least they scored 42 points against Baylor.

I guess it's like choosing which rape was worse.

Mizzou fans don't get to talk about soft schedules this year.

True. Other than Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, Texas A&M, and possibly Alabama, we only play a few bowl teams.