Quote:
Originally Posted by Dartgod
(Post 11846946)
Love this article from MLB.com. Especially this part:
|
I've been thinking about this PECOTA bashing.
Look how many things had to go amazingly right for us to win 95:
Volquez - career year
Morales - career year
Young - comeback candidate
Madson - comeback candidate
Moose - massive upswing
Hosmer - avoided previous slumpy periods
Cain - took a big step forward offensively, MVP candidate
Added Cueto and Zobrist, although Cueto's regular season was about a wash
Now let's look at what went about as expected:
Sal, Esky, Ventura, Guthrie, Herrera, Davis (although PECOTA would have predicted regression - it doesn't understand cyborgs), Dyson, Hoch, Duffy, Holland (results-wise anyway - he got really lucky to get out of so many Jams)
And what went worse:
Infante regressed big time
Gordon missed 2 months
Rios was subpar/injury
Vargas injury
So many things went really well for us and GMDM. I'd like to see what PECOTA would show if you could somehow fudge it to predict all our pickups except Rios having career years or big comeback years and 3 of our carryover guys making big leaps offensively.
What I'm getting at is I bet it would be close to our true outcome - not some fundamental flaw where PECOTA can't figure out contact hitters. We just ran insanely well with our pickups, lack of injuries, guys making leaps vs. regressions, etc.
Now maybe there's some secret sauce in our clubhouse/coaching/Yosting that creates an environment where all those guys could get the most out of their talents. You can't ever quantify any of that, but it doesn't mean it's not real to some degree. If PECOTA has a big blind spot I'd predict it's more in those factors vs. the Royals hitting style.