Well the coach specializes in QBs, the GM was a top scout for a team that continually took QBs no matter if they already had one or not. I'm gonna go with they know the importance of QBs.

Let's see... Foles was the 88th pick overall. If Geno is ten times better, would we calculate his appropriate value by dividing 88 by 10?

That's 8.8, which is close to what a lot of people have Geno ranked. And clearly good enough for the #1 overall pick if you're a QB, especially in a putrid class of non QBs such as this.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fO1Vhc88QkM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Remove your lips from Geno's cock...it's getting really old. How do you know Geno is ten times better than Foles? Apples and Oranges...you really can't compare other than one has actually taken a snap in the NFL...

. <- The point







You

He's garbage. Under ten yards per completion. Something Matt Cassel hasn't even managed to do.

There are checkdown Kings, and then there is Christian Ponder

I'll be disappointed. I want the best QB. I don't care if Andrew Luck is not in this draft. I want the best one from it. I want a front office that can identify that QB... and draft him.

We have the 1st pick. Not the 5th. Not the 10th. Not the 17th. The 1st. No excueses.

If they gamble in any way, shape, or form in trying to trade down and miss on the QB, I am going to be pissed. And if they think all the QB's are going to last until later in the first round and try and trade back up, and we miss out on the best QB, I am going to be pissed.

And by miss out, I am talking about some other team taking a QB before us, and that QB turning out to be the real thing. So it may take a year or two, but at that point I will be pissed big time becuse we have the 1st pick. No damn excuse to miss out on a QB this time around. None!

I'll be disappointed if they don't take a QB with one of their first 3 picks, but I can't get on board with the idea of just taking your favorite QB first, regardless of where you have him slotted. They may like Smith or Barkley the best, but still have them at a second round grade. They may never feel there's a QB in this draft that will be a franchise QB. I can't tell them they're wrong, and by the draft they'll have done more research than anyone on CP. I hope they find a QB they love, but it appears they haven't yet.

Ironically, Geno had like a higher percent of scrimmage/screen passes than Wilson, Barkley, or Glennon.

Those are different. Brady throws a lot of short passes but you can't just compare Matt and his 10 passes from inside 10 yards statistically. Matt is dumping off because he can't read anything and panics. Meanwhile Brady is slicing up a defense methodically. Different intentions and much different results. Different situation with Geno vs. Matt but it is still a different scenario. One had designed plays, the other panic plays.

Actually he said they want to go to as many workouts as possible, him and Reid, and set up more workouts themselves.
Posted via Mobile Device

that makes 2 of us

We like to just stand there and bleed.

and what Mr. Dorsey "really feels about this QB class" remains to be seen:thumb:

I was reading the story as it was picked up by CBS, and it ticked me off that they included Teichers opinion that they might not take a QB at all in the draft. Dorsey didn't say that, its all Teicher.