Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780121)

I've watched plenty of 49ers games over the past few years.

The statistical breakdowns only confirm what I saw on the field.

There is literally no way anyone can defend a QB who sucks on third down and doesn't throw the ball down the field.

It's a recipe for disaster.

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780129)

I sure do, Dave.

I used to be one.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9780131)

SO disastrous that he led his team into overtime in the NFC Championship with crap wide receivers.

SO disastrous that he had the highest QB rating in the league before injury last year.

Yeah, you're right: That's disastrous. I'd just hate to see the same thing happen in Kansas City.

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9780118)

Honestly, I'd have to review it but there are a few factors such as letting your gameplan dictate the play call, player error, poor route design, as well as what you'd mentioned. I'll try to look at it and provide some cut ups of the route designs and the coverages if A) people are interested and B) the plays are in fact different.

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9780138)

Also first in the league in YARDS PER ATTEMPT......

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9780138)

Also first in the league in YARDS PER ATTEMPT......

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780142)

I've already debunked this idea that his high yards per attempt indicated anything positive. It didn't. Because he didn't throw the ball down the field. Literally threw fewer passes over 15 yards than MATT CASSEL.

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780129)

I sure do, Dave.

I used to be one.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9780147)

Debunked?

LMAO

How in the world can you deny that you've created a false narrative?

Have you lost your mind?

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780142)

I've already debunked this idea that his high yards per attempt indicated anything positive. It didn't. Because he didn't throw the ball down the field. Literally threw fewer passes over 15 yards than MATT CASSEL.

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780142)

I've already debunked this idea that his high yards per attempt indicated anything positive. It didn't. Because he didn't throw the ball down the field. Literally threw fewer passes over 15 yards than MATT CASSEL.

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9780153)

anything positive? 19-5-1? That seems pretty damn positive to me.

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780150)

Have you?

Alex Smith isn't good at any of the things that take teams to championships.

The ****er takes more sacks than...MATT CASSEL.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9780175)

And yet somehow, he had the highest QB rating in the league last year.

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9780158)

27-7, baby!

Destruction. Enjoy it.