![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"Could" and "if" are the two biggest words in the English language.
Goodell "could" make a play for repeat offender status but, with no legal charges made, "if" he does the union would be all over it like flies. I think Goodell is going to be a Goodell here, If giving Hunt the right to play again was punishment to the Chiefs, then Hill, and the Chiefs, will be feeling this in the lower intestines. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/n7WcS3B.png |
#43 overall for Campbell hmm. Veach is the trade king!! Do it!
|
Campbell isn't lasting to the end of the 2nd round
|
It would probably take a trade, I agree.
|
Quote:
:shrug: |
Hardman all day for me
|
Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/JnZ3o8M.png https://i.imgur.com/cw79ySA.png |
Quote:
That has nothing to do with this. By second chance, they didn’t mean 2nd strike according to the rules. It’s a figure of speech. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did Baldy Upforelection say, "Someone abused the child."? Or, did he say, "A crime occurred."? Those are different things. The "crime" Baldy referenced could be ... Lying To The Popo! ... or ... Withholding Evidence From The Popo! ... or something like that. Not necessarily child abuse, right? If I was an attorney, I'd need to see the evidence that child abuse actually took place. It's the absence of such evidence that prohibits them from filing charges, correct? Alternatively, they need a witness willing to testify. Or did I mishear or misunderstand? FAX |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.