people are just online douchebags here. Hope ya'll dont get offended. Just tell them to **** off right back. lol

LMAO

lol! I'm good man. Not offended at all. I enjoy reading this site quite a bit.

Indeed

Don't let Bug ruffle your feathers. He's kind of a turd.

Did you read the article that was posted? For crissakes it makes bleacherreport look like Pulitzer Prize winning journalism.

A roundhouse kick to the left testicle? You offend your master

^ Lmao! good stuff

Briefly browsing through the site to give it a fair chance, these are some of the gems I've stumbled upon.

"Any of these guys (TEs) could start on any team, even Demetrius Harris".

"As I’ve written in the past, I think that guard play is one of the determining factors of whether or not an offense is successful or not"

"Maybe the most important part of a football team is the offensive line"

"With (Jeff)Allen, he had a fairly strong rookie year"

"It’s funny to even consider a rookie to be a possible breakout candidate"

" The signing of veteran Dunta Robinson gives us the best Nickelback corner in the league, at least in my opinion"

"At the Safety position, we have two solid players. First, Kendrick Lewis we have a veteran who has improved every season"

"The Chiefs will attack their weaknesses while the Broncos have to adjust their game around the Kansas City’s strengths."


and an article titled "Signs of Hope in Oakland"

ROFL

I almost want to take back the bad things I said about Bleacher Report.

We should start up a Facebook page called Sloth Concerns.

Get on it Sorter!

My articles pertaining to various fauna would undoubtedly be better than any of the things I've read on that website.

The question is, do we base it on concerns about sloths or concerns a sloth might have (sloth POV)?