ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs trade 34th pick for Cassel and Vrabel (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203311)

KC kid 02-28-2009 12:08 PM

You had to know that this was coming in the opening press conference for Scott Piolo when he said and I paraphrase: There is only one Tom Brady and there is only one Matt Cassel

nychief 02-28-2009 12:08 PM

our qb situation is a joke... we had to add a vet, we just added a starter and I'm sure we are still going to draft a late round qb too...

We are adding building blocks..

wild1 02-28-2009 12:08 PM

I hope we gave up a second. We could move back to 10-15 and get value at a position we need and recoup the second.

Basileus777 02-28-2009 12:08 PM

This board hates Cassel and I've been one of his few defenders here, so naturally most people are going to hate this move. I don't really think Cassel is a franchise QB and I would probably have preffered to draft a QB at 3, but I think Cassel can be a good starting QB in this league and can live with it if it's only for a 2nd rounder.

HC_Chief 02-28-2009 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537454)
He takes too many sacks
He has a below average arm
He throws a crappy deep ball
He put up all his stats in about 4 games
He played with an ungodly WR tandem.

Other than that, nothing.

Whatever happened to Clark Hunt saying that if we wanted to compete for a championship we had to draft and develop our own franchise quarterback?

You need a "franchise quarterback" available in the draft. This year doesn't offer one.

Frosty 02-28-2009 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrior (Post 5537436)
Grbac part II

More like Scott Mitchell, part II.

To be honest, there was a ton of value at need at that 2nd round pick - Barwin, Unger, English, Sintim.

Reaper16 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueballs (Post 5537422)
Cassel and Sanchez
FTW

Hmmm. Actually, that would kind of be awesome in some ways.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5537448)
I have no problem with trading down - hopefully we could get back the second round pick we traded to NE.

Teams almost never trade up into the top 3. Especially in a draft that lacks elite level talent at the top.

SAUTO 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537454)
He takes too many sacks
He has a below average arm
He throws a crappy deep ball
He put up all his stats in about 4 games
He played with an ungodly WR tandem.

Other than that, nothing.

Whatever happened to Clark Hunt saying that if we wanted to compete for a championship we had to draft and develop our own franchise quarterback?

he was in his first year starting. and honestly i could never find where clark ever said draft. but thats another story

doomy3 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Awesome. If this is for the second, I like this a lot.

Hootie 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537439)
Who the hell are we going to draft at 3?

BJ Raji, Aaron Curry, Eugene Monroe?

Yay. We give up the #3 overall for a cover backer, a DT who is too goddamned stupid to stay academically eligible, or a left tackle when we already have one.

This is why I almost preferred we swapped 3 for 23 and picked up an extra late round pick as well...

I mean, lets say we take Curry at #3 now...what's the god damn point? That throws the draft point value out the window...you can get a guy at #23 that can have as much of an impact as Curry at #3, and you won't have to pay a cover backer $25M+ guarnteed.

chiefzilla1501 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537439)
Who the hell are we going to draft at 3?

BJ Raji, Aaron Curry, Eugene Monroe?

Yay. We give up the #3 overall for a cover backer, a DT who is too goddamned stupid to stay academically eligible, or a left tackle when we already have one.

If Raji is rated a top 5 calibre pick, that's a really easy choice. He's the only chance you have at a nose tackle--the most important position in a 3-4.

And again, let me reiterate that DT is the position that historically scores the lowest on the Wonderlic and that Raji struggled with academic ineligibility because he went to a tier 1, challenging school and because he had an academic advisor who didn't do his job.

Smed1065 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5537421)
It just got a whole lot more difficult to envision this team winning a championship. I'd love, love, love for this to work out, for Pioli to prove me an idiot. But I have my sincere doubts about the prospect of me being an idiot.

CP, is that you?

nychief 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrae (Post 5537450)
My concern as well. I would have almost preferred to swap 1st round picks then to give up the 2nd.


I think we draft Crabtree.

RedThat 02-28-2009 12:09 PM

I like this move. You know why?

We've just improved the QB position #1.

Secondly, it creates competition in camp for our QB's.

There is now good depth at the QB position. Cassell comes from a winning team has started a full season and played well. AND, if we didn't give up our #3 overall pick, even better!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.