![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Entirely different situation. But then I think you're smart enough to recognize that, and you are only being stupid by choice. |
Quote:
|
some dumbass shit in this here thread.
|
Quote:
How would the NFL have survived if John Elway had decided to play baseball instead of playing football? Surely there are other top athletes that choose a different sport over the NFL but somehow we don't notice the absence. The majority of the current player pool will turn over within a few years anyway. The players are far more replaceable than the owners who have created this league and managed to shepherd it into becoming the top American professional sport. |
Quote:
Natural turnover process vs. replacing every player in a singular stroke. |
Quote:
Surely you can't be this dumb. Theres a reason less than 10% of college football players go to the NFL. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And no, atmosphere isn't the only reason college football is popular. It's popular because they play an exciting game despite their inferior players. |
I can't believe anyone still argues with patteeu. Its obvious 90% of the time he's out just to yank your chain. I actually agree, the owners own the teams... if they want to start over with new players they have the right to do that. I think you could argue that guys like Casey Printers and Drew Tate aren't going to bring the star power of Brady and Manning... but if that's what the owners want, it's their business.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.