ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Training camp starts. Go on record. What will be the Chiefs record? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=261841)

Three7s 07-29-2012 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8775438)
3-3 is probably the best case scenario to me. None of those games will be cakewalks. Buffalo is probably the easiest game you have but that is their home opener and they signed Mario Williams. Gonna be a tough team to beat under those circumstances.

Not to mention, I don't think the Chiefs have ever beaten Buffalo in Buffalo.

Coogs 07-29-2012 09:12 AM

This is so hard to predict right now. Here is why.

If we just look at the 6 division games and use a hypothetical 14-3 score somewhat early in the game. If we happen to be on the front end of that score, all three of the teams would appear to have the fire power to rally behind thier QB throwing the ball. Rivers, Manning, and Palmer have all shown they are never out of a game no matter what the score.

Now if we happen to be on the back end of that score, we are on life support because the opponents can pin their ears back and get after Cassel. He has never proven good when under pressure.

When we step out of our division, the same case can be made in many of the games we are going to be playing.

It is going to be imperative we get ahead, as I don't see us as a come from behind team... going into training camp.

Copping out bigtime... anywhere from 6-10 to 10-6

siberian khatru 07-29-2012 09:14 AM

10-6

milkman 07-29-2012 09:17 AM

I really am not a fan of the manner in which Clathan delivers the message, but he's right.

This team will be playing against far superior QBs than the ones they faced last year, and we still have Matt Cassel.

Those QBs will make plays to win games.

Matt Cassel won't.

BigRedChief 07-29-2012 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8775570)
I really am not a fan of the manner in which Clathan delivers the message, but he's right.

This team will be playing against far superior QBs than the ones they faced last year, and we still have Matt Cassel.

Those QBs will make plays to win games.

Matt Cassel won't.

I don't think you will find anyone who is thinking clearly that will disagree with this assessment. But, lets hope that a healthy Charles, Moeaki and Berry will make us a better team than last years team that will offset at least some of the upgrade in QB of the other teams. . And maybe Poe will finally be that presense in the middle of the line problem we have been desperatly trying to resolve for years.

A lot of if's, thats for damn sure.

Chris Meck 07-29-2012 10:48 AM

10-6.

and by midseason, it's Stanzi.:thumb:

milkman 07-29-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 8775707)
I don't think you will find anyone who is thinking clearly that will disagree with this assessment. But, lets hope that a healthy Charles, Moeaki and Berry will make us a better team than last years team that will offset at least some of the upgrade in QB of the other teams. . And maybe Poe will finally be that presense in the middle of the line problem we have been desperatly trying to resolve for years.

A lot of if's, thats for damn sure.

I think this team will be much better than last season which is why I believe we will be in a lot of close games.

But that's the point.

When it comes time to make plays, the opponents this season have the QB to make plays.

We'll lose a lot of close games because we don't.

I fully expect Matt Cassel to surpass his 2010 numbers because of teh talent around him, and protecting him.

But when the games are close, I fully expect to lose those games, because of Matt Cassel.

Hammock Parties 07-29-2012 10:53 AM

Like I revealed a few days ago:

Matt Cassel has never won a close game against a playoff team.

mlyonsd 07-29-2012 11:00 AM

9-7.

I'd have been a lot more optimistic if we would have kept Orton.

Ming the Merciless 07-29-2012 11:05 AM

No I think we all get what the morons are saying:

If we don't win 10 games, it is Matt Cassel's fault, but if we do - he gets no credit....

We shouldn't win 10 games because our schedule is tough, but if we do then he will get zero credit.

Our schedule is brutal but even though we SHOULDNT win 10 games, if we win less, it will be his fault....If we win more it will be in spite of him....

That about cover it?

Hammock Parties 07-29-2012 11:16 AM

If we win 10 games, Matt Cassel will probably deserve a lot of credit.

Happy?

Slainte 07-29-2012 11:48 AM

8-8. No playoffs.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-29-2012 06:28 PM

http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/07/2...edium=facebook

Ming the Merciless 07-29-2012 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8775778)
If we win 10 games, Matt Cassel will probably deserve a lot of credit.

Happy?

Yes daddy

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_q8cUeK7Uij...Happy+Baby.JPG

WilliamTheIrish 07-29-2012 06:36 PM

6-10
or
5-11

Expect the worst, hope for the best.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.