ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football 49ers cornerback: No gays allowed (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=269499)

Thig Lyfe 01-30-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9366027)
The Gay and Lesbian alliance will come after him and persecute him in the same way they don't want to be.

This is so ****ing stupid and off-base I can't even process it.

mcan 01-30-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9366023)
Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet
Chris Culliver's statement: "It has taken me seeing (my comments) in print to realize that they are hurtful and ugly."
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More

awesome. Good for him. Forgive and forget. Move on.


This is the power of the social slap on the wrist. :)

jspchief 01-30-2013 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 9365477)
I'm more concerned with his apparent misogyny.

Yeah, a man complaining about a woman ragging on him is so 19th century.

okcchief 01-30-2013 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe (Post 9366035)
This is so ****ing stupid and off-base I can't even process it.

I'm sorry, please fill in blanks with the way I should really think and feel. I've surely never seen them try destroy a comedians career because they don't agree with their humor, and can't change the ****ing channel. Words are words. This is not a hate crime.

mcan 01-30-2013 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9366051)
I'm sorry, please fill in blanks with the way I should really think and feel. I've surely never seen them try destroy a comedians career because they don't agree with their humor, and can't change the ****ing channel. Words are words. This is not a hate crime.

I agree with you in that people can be a little righteously indignant when something "offends" them. That said, I think that society has the duty to slap people on the wrist when they have horrible ideas. Like if a local politician wants to institute a "touch the stove a lot" policy. Under this new law, anyone passing by a hot stove must touch it to prove their loyalty to the God of the Stairs, or pay a fine. With the money raised from the fines, we will build a homeless shelter.

Now, I think we would all be within our rights to call this man an idiot. Probably a good dude. I mean, he wants to build a homeless shelter, but his ideas are... Well, horrible.

Same thing with bigotry. No matter how good of a dude this guy might be, THIS particular thing he said was pretty outrageous and all too familiar, and probably lies dormant and undisclosed in the hearts and minds of many... By calling this man out, and embarrassing him, in fact slapping the label "bigot" on him for a bit, we can get all of those who harbor these idiotic ideas to rethink. And know just exactly where their less than social intuitions stand in the marketplace of ideas.

kysirsoze 01-30-2013 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9366027)
Perhaps if people came at him educating him instead of condemning him that might be true. The Gay and Lesbian alliance will come after him and persecute him in the same way they don't want to be. There are plenty of people in this country that have problems or are uncomfortable with gay people. It has a lot to do with how they are raised, and usually revolves around religion. They aren't necessarily bad people that should be condemned. A slow understanding approach, and honest discussion is the way to go about it. You are going from one witch hunt to the next. You can't expect people change their views overnight. If we just need to give programmed responses then go ahead and write a script so we don't have to hear back lash about a similar story every ****ing day. What the guy said is stupid, but the response will be every bit as stupid.

No, the response will be overblown, but it comes from a group of people who have to fight bigotry and prejudice every day. His right to be ignorant and rude is not equal to their right to fair treatment. I agree he shouldn't be branded for life or anything, but it is reasonable for people to protest when someone stands in front of a mic and degrades them.

okcchief 01-30-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcan (Post 9366069)
I agree with you in that people can be a little righteously indignant when something "offends" them. That said, I think that society has the duty to slap people on the wrist when they have horrible ideas. Like if a local politician wants to institute a "touch the stove a lot" policy. Under this new law, anyone passing by a hot stove must touch it to prove their loyalty to the God of the Stairs, or pay a fine. With the money raised from the fines, we will build a homeless shelter.

Now, I think we would all be within our rights to call this man an idiot. Probably a good dude. I mean, he wants to build a homeless shelter, but his ideas are... Well, horrible.

Same thing with bigotry. No matter how good of a dude this guy might be, THIS particular thing he said was pretty outrageous and all too familiar, and probably lies dormant and undisclosed in the hearts and minds of many... By calling this man out, and embarrassing him, in fact slapping the label "bigot" on him for a bit, we can get all of those who harbor these idiotic ideas to rethink. And know just exactly where their less than social intuitions stand in the marketplace of ideas.

Fair enough.

TheGuardian 01-30-2013 09:25 PM

I'm intolerant to intolerance.

Yawn.

So you're a hypocrite. Which is even worse than being tolerant.

Round and round the assclowns go!

ThaVirus 01-30-2013 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9365675)
WHAT? You mean the ghetto thug culture doesn't understand the importance of acceptance and tolerance of they gheys?

You're a ****ing reerun when it comes to race and social dynamics, but you've stumbled onto something here..

Blacks should be FAR more supportive of LBGT community and its fight for rights, yet it seems they are some of its staunchest critics. I never quite understood why; I'm thinking its largely a religious issue.

mcan 01-30-2013 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 9366278)
I'm intolerant to intolerance.

Yawn.

So you're a hypocrite. Which is even worse than being tolerant.

Round and round the assclowns go!


We're talking about different domains entirely. Here's an example:

A guy rapes and murders a little girl. We are justified if we are INTOLERANT of that action and as a society we have a duty to punish that man and give that little girl and her family justice.


There are just some things society should NOT tolerate. Bigotry is one of them.

MahiMike 01-30-2013 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcan (Post 9366069)
I agree with you in that people can be a little righteously indignant when something "offends" them. That said, I think that society has the duty to slap people on the wrist when they have horrible ideas. Like if a local politician wants to institute a "touch the stove a lot" policy. Under this new law, anyone passing by a hot stove must touch it to prove their loyalty to the God of the Stairs, or pay a fine. With the money raised from the fines, we will build a homeless shelter.

Now, I think we would all be within our rights to call this man an idiot. Probably a good dude. I mean, he wants to build a homeless shelter, but his ideas are... Well, horrible.

Same thing with bigotry. No matter how good of a dude this guy might be, THIS particular thing he said was pretty outrageous and all too familiar, and probably lies dormant and undisclosed in the hearts and minds of many... By calling this man out, and embarrassing him, in fact slapping the label "bigot" on him for a bit, we can get all of those who harbor these idiotic ideas to rethink. And know just exactly where their less than social intuitions stand in the marketplace of ideas.

I hate it when people retract what they said because of peer pressure.

TheGuardian 01-30-2013 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcan (Post 9366325)
We're talking about different domains entirely. Here's an example:

A guy rapes and murders a little girl. We are justified if we are INTOLERANT of that action and as a society we have a duty to punish that man and give that little girl and her family justice.


There are just some things society should NOT tolerate. Bigotry is one of them.

I agree if it means someone is getting denied basic human rights. However everyone makes a big deal out of people saying bundle of sticks today. It's absurd. I mean bundle of sticks is even in a filter here. JFC.

stevieray 01-30-2013 09:58 PM

one who sucks the penis about sums it up

/diceman

ThaVirus 01-30-2013 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 9366350)
I agree if it means someone is getting denied basic human rights. However everyone makes a big deal out of people saying pillowbitergot today. It's absurd. I mean pillowbitergot is even in a filter here. JFC.

Why shouldn't it be? Its could be a pretty derogatory term, maybe not to you, but to many homosexuals.

To me, your argument is no different than someone saying "I can't believe we can't go around saying ****er and person of Hispanic heritage! I've been saying it all my life and I don't wanna change. **** these intellectual pussies!".

ThaVirus 01-30-2013 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 9366365)
Why shouldn't it be? Its could be a pretty derogatory term, maybe not to you, but to many homosexuals.

To me, your argument is no different than someone saying "I can't believe we can't go around saying ****er and person of Hispanic heritage! I've been saying it all my life and I don't wanna change. **** these intellectual pussies!".

LMAO "person of Hispanic heritage" HAHAHAHAHA

That's ****ing great, but you guys get my point


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.