Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11254296)

The Rams wouldn't have moved to St. Louis without that clause.

Keep in mind, St. Louis offered a sweetheart deal to lure the Rams from the Los Angeles market to St. Louis. Part of that was the stadium deal.

Your owner doesn't want to be in St. Louis any longer, purchased land in Los Angeles to build a stadium and could pay for it in cash, while having nearly $5 billion left over.

I feel for you but you're hosed.

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11254329)

The City dug itself a huge hole. The only chance I feel that STL has of keeping the Rams is the whole notion of the Rams exhausting every possible option to improve the stadium situation.

I doubt the Rams announce they'd be going to LA within the next month for 2016 as it would be complete death for ticket sales.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11254296)

Your owner doesn't want to be in St. Louis any longer, purchased land in Los Angeles to build a stadium and could pay for it in cash, while having nearly $5 billion left over.