ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs McCluster definitely moving to RB full-time (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=244416)

BigMeatballDave 04-28-2011 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7598901)
**** you guys. **** McCluster. He'll probably be off the team in three years.

Mecca said Hali sucked.

Simply Red 04-28-2011 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7598934)
I'm curious to know why the misleading thread title hasnt been edited.

This place delivers. You really forget just how much it does, until you take a little break from it. That shits just funny, and i'm not even sure it was supposed to b.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2011 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7598944)
Mecca said Hali sucked.

LMAO

Why is that relevant?

Hali was a ****ing stud as soon as he got to the NFL.

BigMeatballDave 04-28-2011 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7598951)
LMAO

Why is that relevant?

Hali was a ****ing stud as soon as he got to the NFL.

As sure as Mecca was that Hali would bust, this is where you're at now with Dex.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2011 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7598977)
As sure as Mecca was that Hali would bust, this is where you're at now with Dex.

LMAO

This is just idiotic. Mecca was proven wrong within a few months.

I look pretty smart right now.

BigMeatballDave 04-28-2011 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7598980)



I look pretty smart right now.

LMAO

Hammock Parties 04-28-2011 12:01 PM

Laugh all you want. If the Chiefs are moving McCluster to RB fulltime, they are more down on him than I am.

Simply Red 04-28-2011 12:03 PM

dude, all he has to do is follow Willie Ro..]]]]]]]]]]]]]

BigMeatballDave 04-28-2011 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7598992)
Laugh all you want. If the Chiefs are moving McCluster to RB fulltime, they are more down on him than I am.

Yeah, because thats all hes gonna do. Charles never runs passing routes.

Easy 6 04-28-2011 01:10 PM

Count me in the 'whats the big deal' camp, as long as he's productive wherever he is, i'm all for it.

Thought we had a WR but got a speedy & jukey RB instead, big deal.

HotRoute 04-28-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 7599214)
Count me in the 'whats the big deal' camp, as long as he's productive wherever he is, i'm all for it.

Thought we had a WR but got a speedy & jukey RB instead, big deal.

totally this. why flame away about this kid? he could be a star once given the chance. he lit up the SEC while at Ole' Miss and has a chance to be a very elusive back in the NFL

Easy 6 04-28-2011 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotRoute (Post 7599234)
totally this. why flame away about this kid? he could be a star once given the chance. he lit up the SEC while at Ole' Miss and has a chance to be a very elusive back in the NFL

Some people are acting like 'THIS IS GONNA SET US BACK THREE YEARS DAMMIT'.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2011 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 7599256)
Some people are acting like 'THIS IS GONNA SET US BACK THREE YEARS DAMMIT'.

Every draft pick that doesn't fill a need when you have multiple GLARING needs sets you back.

We have a #3 RB instead of a starting WR...that's ****ing awesome....

DeezNutz 04-28-2011 01:45 PM

Lots of mocks have Gabbert going to SF. Don't know how they could do this, since they should still be suffering greatly because of the Smith selection.

Isn't there are a ****ing 27-year moratorium on taking your next QB in the first?

Easy 6 04-28-2011 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7599329)
Every draft pick that doesn't fill a need when you have multiple GLARING needs sets you back.

We have a #3 RB instead of a starting WR...that's ****ing awesome....

Meh, he was never going to be more than a slot guy at best anyway, so i dont feel like we lost out all that bad, have we gotten the corresponding value out of him from where he was picked? no, atleast not yet.

But i think we eventually will with him at RB, which is a better fit for him anyway IMO. I wouldnt get too hung up on 'he's a #3' or 'a lightly used #2' or whatever, i think the coaches will get creative in how he's used & we'll eventually get our moneys worth.

The Franchise 04-28-2011 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7598934)
I'm curious to know why the misleading thread title hasnt been edited.

Don't **** with my thread. :D

HotRoute 04-28-2011 02:12 PM

A few home run TDs for fifty yrds and people around here are going to be saying that McCluster Needs more carries

Hammock Parties 04-28-2011 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotRoute (Post 7599424)
A few home run TDs for fifty yrds and people around here are going to be saying that McCluster Needs more carries

http://i56.tinypic.com/sw691e.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.