3 minute evaluation huh? That's Jr Drafturbator level BS right there. What's next? Evaluating players off YouTube reels?

Except I predicted we would draft Hogan as a project as a low risk last year

He's not Cam Newton but he'll probably be better than Manziel and Geno. Not exactly great company.

Well we'll see who's right in 2 years where his true value falls. People were drooling over Lynch in the 1st round, and how has he turned out so far?

Bookmarked.

Lynch is an abomination. Was so cool to let the mule toolers know just how bad he was in camp last year too ROFL Of course spambotmo2724 had 125 twatter references from hacks spinning sunshine bullshit.

Why do you think accuracy is a big issue? He's thrown 67% completion % all three years. Pretty much the same as Mariotta in college.

"Overall, Watson was accurate on 47.5 percent of his deep targets, throwing for 1,196 yards and 18 touchdowns on passes of 20-plus yards. Only Bowling Green’s Matt Johnson found paydirt on more occasions in 2015. Watson was a little aggressive on occasion, throwing seven picks on deep targets, but he made many more positive plays than mistakes, especially late in the year." (From PFF last year).

I'm not claiming to be a Watson or QB expert, I'm just trying to compare him to recent QB's who came out and how they are transitioning in the NFL.

Most NFL personnel men have a 3rd round grade on Watson, and it's easy to see why.... 1/2 field reads, deep ball floats, frame concerns, etc.....

I personally don't want him in KC.

LINK ?

Watch Watson get drafted by some shit organization like the Browns... have an awful rookie season, and then all of the True Fans will be all over CP claiming, "See! I told you he wasn't going to be good... this is why the Chiefs shouldn't draft a QB!" - lol

There might be 1 or 2 people who fit your descriptor

ROFL
Saying it's hard to pass on someone if he's there is not the same as predicting a draft pick. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if in that little world you live in with your Boo, Alex, a vague reference would be considered concrete evidence.

If you weren't a trolling reerun I might would agree with you on some things such as this.

Too bad you're too ****ing stupid and arrogant to be worth much more than a blip of time, so here it is:

I said Watson will go top 6 because he was very accurate in college and far better than Cam Newton in college. Cam Newton still went #1 didn't he? You smart ****er you.

As for pro projection of Watson, I see him about how I see Cam: A below average QB that's over-hyped.

The problem with you is that you can't differentiate two entirely different topics of discussion. Where he gets drafted versus his overall projection are two entirely different things. Teams reach on QBs every single ****ing year and Watson was successful, throws the ball pretty damn well, and was accurate. A team is going to take that, run with it, and see if they can teach him the rest.

Kid, quit being a douchebag. And quit stalking me.

Your football takes are garbage. I have yet to see anyone compliment you on your takes, predictions, analysis. Absolutely none.

I like his takes. His insight is infinitely more interesting and helpful than any bullshit you post.