ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ONE HILLUVA STORY - HOW TYREEK IS NOT ONLY INNOCENT – HE IS A VICTIM (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=323558)

O.city 06-27-2019 08:41 AM

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Tyreek has more trust in the Chiefs now than he ever has. They believed and trusted him enough to stand by him thru all this.

Granted that's because he's a ****ing badass football player but they obviously like the person a lot too.

Pasta Little Brioni 06-27-2019 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 14324643)
Idiot Pats fan?

Asterix is dumb enough to fit the bill...Could be Idaho too as wrong as he was about the situation.

FringeNC 06-27-2019 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14324623)
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see fault in what Mellinger wrote. He clearly said “IF the allegation was true, then the Chiefs should release Hill.”

Come on. The tone of the articles coming out of the Star ominous. Additionally, the head of the Sports section, Rosen, strongly suggested in Tweets that they had all types of corroborating evidence against Hill. The Star buried Hill. And is it even appropriate for a newspaper to write articles...."If someone is guilty of unsubstantiated crime ABC, then XYZ must happen"? What's the purpose in that if not to prematurely bury a person?

staylor26 06-27-2019 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14324649)
Come on. The tone of the articles coming out of the Star ominous. Additionally, the head of the Sports section, Rosen, strongly suggested in Tweets that they had all types of corroborating evidence against Hill. The Star buried Hill. And is it even appropriate for a newspaper to write articles...."If someone is guilty of unsubstantiated crime ABC, then XYZ must happen"? What's the purpose in that if not to prematurely bury a person?

Exactly.

O.city 06-27-2019 08:48 AM

I think that comes back to my theory that the star thought they had all this incriminating evidence that they got from the GF/Fiancé side.

I'm guessing Pryor got all this info and replayed it to everyone at the star and they thought Hill was donezo.

Which, isn't how this is supposed to work.

Redbled 06-27-2019 09:02 AM

It’d be interesting to see a lawsuit develop from all of this for libel.

TEX 06-27-2019 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redbled (Post 14324686)
It’d be interesting to see a lawsuit develop from all of this for libel.

Oh-Oh! Now you did it. Now all the Planet "legal experts" will chime in as to why that won't work.

TEX 06-27-2019 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14324662)
I think that comes back to my theory that the star thought they had all this incriminating evidence that they got from the GF/Fiancé side.

I'm guessing Pryor got all this info and replayed it to everyone at the star and they thought Hill was donezo.

Which, isn't how this is supposed to work.

Bet you're right.

Halfcan 06-27-2019 09:20 AM

With a healthy Watkins, Kelce, JRob, Hardman, and some great pass catching RB's - teams will not be able to use Safety help on Reek like they did last year. He is bigger, quicker and more motivated than last year.

"They should be terrified!"

Go back and watch Mahomes 49th TD pass to Reek against the Faders- for a preview of what is coming!

RunKC 06-27-2019 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14324649)
Come on. The tone of the articles coming out of the Star ominous. Additionally, the head of the Sports section, Rosen, strongly suggested in Tweets that they had all types of corroborating evidence against Hill. The Star buried Hill. And is it even appropriate for a newspaper to write articles...."If someone is guilty of unsubstantiated crime ABC, then XYZ must happen"? What's the purpose in that if not to prematurely bury a person?

So you would have them not report on news when it drops? That’s their job.

What Pryor and Rosen did was shitty and they deserve every piece of criticism thrown their way, but bitching at Mellinger for his piece doesn’t make sense.

He clearly said “If the allegations were true, Chiefs should release Tyreek.”

Sam was actually fair in his article as seen here:

Quote:

We should pause here to recognize that the picture is still muddy. A police report and DCF investigation does not necessarily mean a crime was committed, and Hill has not been charged. You know how this works. But the parameters are heartbreaking. Life-altering. If true, the result is awful, most of all for the child and mother.
This is the story I’m referring to. The first one Sam wrote.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Wrote about Tyreek Hill. The first thing we all do is hope this isn&#39;t true. The second thing we&#39;ll have to do is deal with it if it is. <a href="https://t.co/jdRIAjwHUJ">https://t.co/jdRIAjwHUJ</a></p>&mdash; Sam Mellinger (@mellinger) <a href="https://twitter.com/mellinger/status/1106724255922835463?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I’ll look at the following ones to see if he said something stupid, but I don’t see anything wrong with this first one.

TravelingChiefs 06-27-2019 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redbled (Post 14324686)
It’d be interesting to see a lawsuit develop from all of this for libel.

As I've said before a lawsuit is a win win for Reek. The Star and others would have to on record for their reasons of gotcha reporting. Hill might not win the case but he'd get his side of the story documented in court.

007 06-27-2019 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14324744)
So you would have them not report on news when it drops? That’s their job.

What Pryor and Rosen did was shitty and they deserve every piece of criticism thrown their way, but bitching at Mellinger for his piece doesn’t make sense.

He clearly said “If the allegations were true, Chiefs should release Tyreek.”

Sam was actually fair in his article as seen here:



This is the story I’m referring to. The first one Sam wrote.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Wrote about Tyreek Hill. The first thing we all do is hope this isn&#39;t true. The second thing we&#39;ll have to do is deal with it if it is. <a href="https://t.co/jdRIAjwHUJ">https://t.co/jdRIAjwHUJ</a></p>— Sam Mellinger (@mellinger) <a href="https://twitter.com/mellinger/status/1106724255922835463?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I’ll look at the following ones to see if he said something stupid, but I don’t see anything wrong with this first one.

The reason most are putting Sam up there with Brooke is that he was white knighting her story. He was also doing the same thing as she was, saying we have more info you have not heard yet. It wasn't a good look.

Halfcan 06-27-2019 09:54 AM

If the NFL were smart, they would not want to set a precedent for scumbags blackmailing their players from this point forward. They would drop this sham of a case and put out a statement like this.

"After careful review, we have found that TR did not abuse his son and has not been charged with any crime. His custody situation is being handled and he is complying with everything that is asked of him. Although we are deeply disappointed in his language on a tape that was released, we feel that it was not intended as a threat of violence and taken out of context. Furthermore, new information has come forward, that the recording made without TR's knowledge, was also intended to shame him and cause him financial ruin. We are against any and all domestic violence and take abuse or even verbal abuse very seriously. TR has previously been suspended from the team while the case has been reviewed and we feel that no further punishment is warranted. We will continue to monitor this situation and TR's progress and if any further evidence comes out we will reopen our investigation. IF any abusive situation is found, TR realizes it will be dealt with the harshest penalty possible. Our main concern is the welfare of the child and we feel he is in a safe environment and hopefully will never have to go through this situation again."

KC Hawks 06-27-2019 09:58 AM

NFL investigators on Hill: "He is very sweet."

TEX 06-27-2019 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 14324782)
NFL investigators on Hill: "He is very sweet."

and "He GOOD!"


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.