Why is that, dumbass?

Wow...big shock....

I get neg repped for voicing an opinion.......

I guess it's easier to do than debate your position on the subject.

Of course there was also a O PI call against Heath Miller, followed by a sack taking Pit out of FG range, only Pit got a first down and then a TD instead of folding.

Damn, the more I think about this game the more I think it was terrible. I tried to overlook all the yawning I was doing in the 4th quarter, but damn, Seattle couldn't hit their wide open WR's and when they did they would drop the damn ball. Everytime they got anywhere near FG range they would fold like a lawn chair with a 600 lbs woman sitting on it. If it wasn't for a few lucky plays here and there Pit would have been even worse.

Seattle can't be held accountable.......it was the ref's fault. :rolleyes:

Aren't you paying attention?

That's actually a pretty damned good argument, and one that at least explains to me why people are so bent out of shape over this.
I suppose I can get behind that.

Offsetting fouls STILL result in no touchdown.

Seattle just doesn't lose 10 yards.

Unless you're looking for a no-call, which would be convenient for the Seahawks.

The mistake was made by not calling illegal contact on Hope, followed by PI against Jackson.

Sour grapes for Seahawks fan, sure.

What about the THOUSANDS of people that watched the game rooting for no one that also saw it?

The NFL not only needs younger officials, they need full-time, skilled officials that get compensated as such.

And they need a full-time replay official that reviews every play so they can scrap the challenge system. For once, I think college football (the Big 10 in particular) got it right.

Let's not forget that Seattle couldn't close the deal on their offensive drive sin the first half when they had to. The better team may not have won, if you go by stats, but the hotter team did, sorry you flaming ****ing dicknose. Go back to Seattle now and pretend that you are a Seahag fan.

I never said my attack was "justified". I was merely pointing out why I responded to you the way I did. I don't care what you believe. I didn't come here out of thin air and call you a sore loser. You did. If you feel that makes me a hypocrite, so be it.

I never said anything about your opinion. All opinions are valid here, whether they're stupid or not. That's part of the fun of this place.

The fact that I have 40,000 posts is only relevant because most of the people on this thread already know that I'm an asshole. You're just finding out for the first time.

That would have been the correct call.

How about a full-time replay official for every play, and then you get two penalty challenges.

Part-time officials that avg. 60 years of age just isn't the way to go.

The better team won. I don't think anybody here is saying anything other than that.

You can't just ignore the officials in last night's game -- unless you care nothing about the future of the NFL.

Agreed. I think your first suggestion will happen eventually.

While I would vote to scrap replay entirely, I can't see that happening, or taking challenges out of coaches hands.

Fair enough.

I'm not going to forget that any more than I'm going to forget all of the points that the officials took off the board with bad officiating...

Anyone else finding it funny that TJ is so up in arms about bad officiating?

His team benefits from it more than anyone else in the league........

Defend chop-blocking, greased jerseys and cheating the cap reply in 3...2...1...

ROFL