![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You continue to beat the drum that it's horrible value to take a MLB in the Top 5, but then are advocating doing the exact same thing by taking a safety Top 5, which would also be horrible value. If #5 is too high to take a MLB, which we DESPERATELY need, then it's also too high to take a Safety with that same pick. Especially when we have more pressing needs. I'm a huge fan of Mays, but I think there will be better options available at positions of desperate need when we pick - whether it's at #2 or #8 - or anywhere in between. |
Quote:
although it is still fantasy no matter where you say it |
One of those DE's will drop into the top of the 2nd...there's a bunch of DE's but no real true elite prospect.
Hell Cushing might drop into the top of the 2nd, and anyone who watches SC knows how much Cushing tends to stand out amongst the other great players. |
Quote:
|
If we dont take Oher in the first, Mack in the 2nd, and Loadholt in the 3rd then I am revolting. OL or bust.
|
Quote:
If not joking, sorry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
findthedr will make his return! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Im not against picking Mays if it means improvement on the defense, I think this team could really use a stud at safety because Im not sold on either Pollard or Page. but, if the Chiefs could trade down to like 11th or 12th and stockpile on picks and still manage to pick Mays, then that would put a smile on my face. Improvement in the secondary plus stockpiling draft picks is what this fan wouldn't mind. |
Quote:
He'd be a great value (and need) pick in the top of the 2nd. |
Quote:
I'd take him because what Taylor Mays brings is special, he allows the team to blitz because his range allows him to get to places most other guys never could. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.