ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 8 « First 4567 8
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Do we have the worst 53 man roster in football? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=213397)

Hootie 09-06-2009 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6039877)
The Chiefs had six picks in the draft where they could have drafted an OL after they took Jackson. They took a project TE, a 3rd/4th corner, a DE, a WR/KR, a kicker, an OT, and a running back.

They traded for two OL after they realized that they didn't address the problem with even so much as a stop gap.

The problem lies that they passed up talented players in the draft, who were cheap and good value at that point, for positions of lesser need and impact.
so...

BPA doesn't matter now with the new regime?

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-06-2009 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6039955)
so...

BPA doesn't matter now with the new regime?
Learn to read, dumbass. What do you think "value" means?

Just Passin' By 09-06-2009 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6039955)
so...

BPA doesn't matter now with the new regime?
With Belichick and Pioli, Value and BPA are not necessarily the same thing.

Titty Meat 09-06-2009 01:28 PM
Nope the Lions still suck

Mecca 09-06-2009 03:34 PM
The Packer kept 3 fullbacks on their roster...that makes absolutely 0 sense.

Saccopoo 09-06-2009 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6040377)
The Packer kept 3 fullbacks on their roster...that makes absolutely 0 sense.
And here I was thinking that four quarterbacks couldn't be topped.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM.
Page 8 of 8 « First 4567 8
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.