ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The myth of Pioli (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=219454)

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-07-2009 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6326306)
True.

However, it comes back to talent evaluation.

Denver acquired 6 new defensive starters and 1 rotational player via FA, and hit on every ****ing one of them. Batting 1.000. 3 new offensive starters, hitting on each. Still batting 1.000.

Shy of Chambers and Succop, not one acquisition of ours, offensively or defensively has been a clear upgrade over their 2008 counterparts. Some have been a push, some have been downgrades. We brought in over 30 players.

One team is batting 1.000, and the other is batting .066.


Xanders+McDaniel> Pioli+Haley.

MOhillbilly 12-07-2009 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6326288)
I don't think there's an ENORMOUS talent gap between them and Hali, DJ, Demorrio Williams and Brandon Flowers.

you are ****ing stoopid.

Mecca 12-07-2009 03:22 PM

This thread tells me one thing, some people want the Chiefs to be good so badly they'll overlook things staring them right in the face just because he's not Carl.

OnTheWarpath15 12-07-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6326322)
Xanders+McDaniel> Pioli+Haley.

Sadly, yes.

DeezNutz 12-07-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6326231)
That doesn't make sense. They have been using changing the culture since the very first day they started. It is not like they started using it last week.

Correct. And it's bullshit, no matter who says it or when.

keg in kc 12-07-2009 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6326297)
If you don't believe they resigned themselves to sucking then you clearly believe they made moves with an eye towards improving the team.

So which one is it?

I believe they wanted to take a hard look at the players on the roster, to ascertain specifically who fits and who doesn't, because they more players that are here who work, the better it is.

I believe that's true on both sides of the ball.

I also believe that every move they've made was made with an eye towards improving the team, including the moves made during the season.

I also believe that what this team is missing is core talent, real superstars that winning teams are built around, and that's not something you can generally find floating around in free agency. Which is why the draft is so very important.

(Which is also what I think differentiates a team like Denver from us. They're at the point - and have been for several years - where they can bring in players to round out an already talented roster. Whereas the Chiefs are starting from the bottom - and have been for several years.)

Titty Meat 12-07-2009 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6326327)
This thread tells me one thing, some people want the Chiefs to be good so badly they'll overlook things staring them right in the face just because he's not Carl.

Or because some people know it takes more then 1 year to build a competitive team. Weren't you the one railing aginst people calling them true fans cuz they wanted to go 8-8 or 9-7 this year by signing players?

Mecca 12-07-2009 03:26 PM

Dude what have they done to start building a core? Where is the starting point?

There's nothing, we got a ****ing 5 tech DE in the top 5 and a shit ass QB a long with a coach that could probably be out coached on gameday by a madden player.

Man I'm really ****ing impressed with this "progress"

Hammock Parties 12-07-2009 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6326335)
I also believe that every move they've made was made with an eye towards improving the team

So, they failed?

Mecca 12-07-2009 03:28 PM

This team hasn't been improved at all by Pioli's moves, 99% of the guys they brought in are either the same or worse than the guy they replaced and in most cases older.

Hell any of the few core players we have are Herm guys, the first year is where you start building a foundation. If this is a foundation Scott Pioli must be homeless.

The Franchise 12-07-2009 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6326339)
Or because some people know it takes more then 1 year to build a competitive team. Weren't you the one railing aginst people calling them true fans cuz they wanted to go 8-8 or 9-7 this year by signing players?

FFS....it's not like everyone is expecting them to rebuild everything in 1 year. I fully expect that if they do things correctly...it's going to take 3-4 years before we can compete with the big boys in the AFC. As it stands now though....they haven't done a whole lot to show me that they know what the hell they are doing.

It took Goff getting injured before we got a new RG.
Niswanger is STILL starting at center even though he ****ing blows.
There are players out there on other team's practice squad that should be getting activated by us....but they're not. Shit...even Harris on our practice squad needs to get moved up. Instead we got Quentin ****ing Lawrence.

AND WHY THE **** IS TERRANCE COPPER STILL ON THIS TEAM!?

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-07-2009 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6326339)
Or because some people know it takes more then 1 year to build a competitive team. Weren't you the one railing aginst people calling them true fans cuz they wanted to go 8-8 or 9-7 this year by signing players?

How many ****ing times does the same false choice have to be trotted out?

Would we be demonstrably better in W's and L's had we drafted a QB @ 3, sat him for a year behind a vet/Croyle, and drafted heavily to the strength of the draft--OL, and stayed in a 4-3

No.

Would this team be showing signs of improvement towards the end of the year as younger players got significant run over 30+ year old broke dick nothings?

I think a case could be made.


Would that be infinitely better long term for the purposes of evaluating the young players that we do have?

Yes.

If this year is an evaluation year, then BRING IN SOME MOTHER****ERS WHO WILL STILL BE HERE WHEN THE EVALUATIONS WILL MATTER.

BigChiefFan 12-07-2009 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6326352)
This team hasn't been improved at all by Pioli's moves, 99% of the guys they brought in are either the same or worse than the guy they replaced and in most cases older.

Hell any of the few core players we have are Herm guys, the first year is where you start building a foundation. If this is a foundation Scott Pioli must be homeless.

Moving away from the gimmick spread offense is already a step in the right direction. Why is so hard to fathom, that there would be growing pains along the way?

OnTheWarpath15 12-07-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6326339)
Or because some people know it takes more then 1 year to build a competitive team. Weren't you the one railing aginst people calling them true fans cuz they wanted to go 8-8 or 9-7 this year by signing players?

Yes, it takes more than one year to build a competitive team.

However, when you bring in over 30 new players, and only 2 of them are clear upgrades, it's going to take a LOT longer.

Most of the folks complaining weren't expecting more than 3-4 wins.

However, they were expecting to see progress, both at the team and individual level.

People can complain that Herm and Carl left them shit, but let's not forget that the new regime turned over 70% of the roster and brought in their handpicked players - and failed at every turn, save Succop and Chambers.

MOhillbilly 12-07-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6326344)
Dude what have they done to start building a core? Where is the starting point?

There's nothing, we got a ****ing 5 tech DE in the top 5 and a shit ass QB a long with a coach that could probably be out coached on gameday by a madden player.

Man I'm really ****ing impressed with this "progress"

This team has a long,long,long, history of front office **** ups. For me that starts at the very top and rolls down hill.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.