ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Bernard Pollard a predicted Pro Bowler!! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=231026)

BossChief 07-23-2010 08:10 PM

Here's to hoping that DJ doesn't go the way of Pollard. If he moves on after this year and ends up in Dallas or Baltimore, he will BLOW UP.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2010 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6895498)
Why did they make the mistake to begin with?

Most people here, just casual fans knew when those players were signed that there were better players already on the roster.

I agree they made mistakes. But to cite Goff, etc, as sacred cows, seems like a stretch.

In fact I would cite guys like Wallace Gilberry as evidence that Pioli and Haley have no bias against players from the previous regime.

The only obvious sacred cows are Cassel and Vrabel.

RedThat 07-23-2010 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6895493)
I think the fact that Goff, Johnson and Brown are all GONE (and Goff and Johnson were gone midseason) is evidence that this regime can admit a mistake, cut their losses and move on.

ESPECIALLY Mike Brown. As much as they talked him up last year, the fact he's gone and not coming back is a positive sign.

Yeah thats a good point.

Mind you, Mike Brown was signed to a one year deal. Even though he sucked, it didn't hurt the organization as much since the contract wasn't long term. Just was a chance they took, unfortunately it didn't work out. Props to Pioli & co for signing him short term.

OnTheWarpath15 07-23-2010 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6895499)
Here's to hoping that DJ doesn't go the way of Pollard. If he moves on after this year and ends up in Dallas or Baltimore, he will BLOW UP.

Yep.

I see Bowe going down this road too, sadly.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2010 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6895499)
Here's to hoping that DJ doesn't go the way of Pollard. If he moves on after this year and ends up in Dallas or Baltimore, he will BLOW UP.

Or he could just miss more tackles.

The guy got a few nice interceptions and a couple sacks but to paint him as this dominant force waiting to emerge is silly.

OnTheWarpath15 07-23-2010 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6895510)
Or he could just miss more tackles.

The guy got a few nice interceptions and a couple sacks but to paint him as this dominant force waiting to emerge is silly.

Anything above average is a HUGE improvement over any other LB on this roster.

He doesn't have to be dominant.

But there's no doubt in my mind he'd be a solid player elsewhere.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2010 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6895505)
Yep.

I see Bowe going down this road too, sadly.

Oh, please.

Bowe will definitely go "down that road" if he doesn't stop DROPPING THE BALL!

OnTheWarpath15 07-23-2010 08:18 PM

I'll leave it at this:

It was an obvious mistake that can't be excused, and I'm just glad to be talking football.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2010 08:20 PM

Yeah, you bastard, kudos on drawing me into the debate.

OnTheWarpath15 07-23-2010 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6895515)
Oh, please.

Bowe will definitely go "down that road" if he doesn't stop DROPPING THE BALL!

The drops are so blown out of proportion.

IIRC, in 2008, Marques Colston had 2 fewer drops than Bowe.

I doubt anyone would be ragging his ass over it.

Andre Johnson's been on the Top 10 list, as has Calvin Johnson.

Good WR's drop the ball.

To get pissy over less than a drop per game is a waste of breath.

Especially when drops are such a subjective stat.

FAX 07-23-2010 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6895498)
Why did they make the mistake to begin with?

Most people here, just casual fans knew when those players were signed that there were better players already on the roster.

I don't disagree.

However, from a coach's point of view, there is more to the evaluation process than a long-distance assessment of which player is "better" from a talent perspective, Mr. OnTheWarpath58. I mean, they have to know the playbook, practice with consistency, prove their ability to deal with adversity, etc.

Although I've disagreed with many of the current regime's player decisions (particularly in respect to the o-line), I have to admit that I lack a complete, comprehensive picture of those players' ability to contribute.

It reasonable to assume that, for every thing we think we know about a player, there are ten things we don't know.

FAX

FAX 07-23-2010 08:23 PM

I still wonder how much of Bowe's "drops" problem is Cassel-related. Bowe wasn't the only receiver dropping passes.

FAX

OnTheWarpath15 07-23-2010 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6895523)
I don't disagree.

However, from a coach's point of view, there is more to the evaluation process than a long-distance assessment of which player is "better" from a talent perspective, Mr. OnTheWarpath58. I mean, they have to know the playbook, practice with consistency, prove their ability to deal with adversity, etc.

Although I've disagreed with many of the current regime's player decisions (particularly in respect to the o-line), I have to admit that I lack a complete, comprehensive picture of those players' ability to contribute.

It reasonable to assume that, for every thing we think we know about a player, there are ten things we don't know.

FAX

I agree to an extent, Mr. FAX.

However, this regime has shown that they struggle to evaluate "talent" that's been right under their nose - forget long distance.

See: Cassel, Matt. Brown, Mike. Long, Lance. Vrabel, Mike. Etc.

Pioli's not the only decision maker in pro sports that have ****ed up by placing more importance on having "his guys" over more talented players, and he won't be the last.

That doesn't make it excusable, however.

BossChief 07-23-2010 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6895523)

It reasonable to assume that, for every thing we think we know about a player, there are ten things we don't know.

FAX

Well, I think that between most guys heres eye test, we know probably about 75-90% about most PLAYERS. Its the PERSON we dont know much about and that is arguably about equal in weight in the evaluation process.

Does the kid think he is just better than everyone else and doesn't work the way the other guy does that isnt far behind him? Give me the kid with the better work ethic that may be a hair behind the other kid as far as talent goes because that is the kid that will be successful three years down the line when the REAL STORY of a PLAYER is told.

RedThat 07-23-2010 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6895523)
I don't disagree.

However, from a coach's point of view, there is more to the evaluation process than a long-distance assessment of which player is "better" from a talent perspective, Mr. OnTheWarpath58. I mean, they have to know the playbook, practice with consistency, prove their ability to deal with adversity, etc.

Although I've disagreed with many of the current regime's player decisions (particularly in respect to the o-line), I have to admit that I lack a complete, comprehensive picture of those players' ability to contribute.

It reasonable to assume that, for every thing we think we know about a player, there are ten things we don't know.

FAX

Your last sentence FAX stands strong. There are prolly a lot of things we don't know. For example, relationship between players and coaches. That is critcal when it comes to overall team chemistry and performance.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.