Originally Posted by ClayWhit (Post 7341530)

FAIL.

We were a bunch of ****ing frauds this year. We got dominated today almost as bad as that game in 2009. Probably worse if you consider Croyle vs. Cassel.

I was shocked beyond belief at the carnage today. The Chiefs FAILED to a degree I couldn't possibly foretell. I thought we'd lose but that was downright brutal.

Scott Pioli needs to have the best offseason in football or we will suck ass next year.

What an abortion. The 2010 Chiefs were undeniably frauds and the last two weeks proved it. Goddammit, I have never hated being right as much as I do now. This sucks ass.

Originally Posted by chris (Post 7341585)

I'm stunned at this response.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7341573)

GoChiefs is correct, however, in claiming that Pioli needs to have one hell of an off-season to address some of our glaring weaknesses, as the schedule will be unforgiving. But this borders on not even being an arguable statement.

Of course a GM needs to make savvy moves or the team/organization will suck.

Originally Posted by ClayWhit (Post 7341530)

FAIL.

We were a bunch of ****ing frauds this year. We got dominated today almost as bad as that game in 2009. Probably worse if you consider Croyle vs. Cassel.

I was shocked beyond belief at the carnage today. The Chiefs FAILED to a degree I couldn't possibly foretell. I thought we'd lose but that was downright brutal.

Scott Pioli needs to have the best offseason in football or we will suck ass next year.

What an abortion. The 2010 Chiefs were undeniably frauds and the last two weeks proved it. Goddammit, I have never hated being right as much as I do now. This sucks ass.

Originally Posted by GoChiefsTinyPenis (Post 7341630)

Best post I have read here today.

Originally Posted by Redcoats58 (Post 7341589)

This must be sarcasm?

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 7341638)

I wouldn't say best, but it is the most accurate.

Originally Posted by AllThingsKC (Post 7341545)

Dude...

We played a game in which we weren't expected to go to, then we were expected to lose easily. What was suppose to happen....happened.

It's ok. We'll be fine. No need for anyone to do anything drastic. Don't jump off a bridge or anything.

Originally Posted by chris (Post 7341677)

actually, quite poor.

For a preseason 8-8 team, we did very well.

This writer brings needless drama and you may want to review all the facts before you accept his revisionist articles.

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 7341695)

We didn't play like a division winner or a 10-6 team.

That is the very definition of "fraud".


Trust me, I hate that tag. Everybody except we Chief's fans were right.

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 7341707)

The Chiefs are only a fraud to people who actually thought they had any chance of making any significant playoff run. Those people are delusional anyway. Most rational fans didn't think so.

And GoChiefs is using the "fraud" term to mean that our improvements from 2009 to 2010 are fraudulent. That's where the backlash is coming from. This team is absolutely better than 2009. As any rational fan would have told you before the game, they have a way to go, and it showed.

Originally Posted by flynismo (Post 7342083)

This 'fraud' talk is absurd.

You bitch that your schedule is soft? Well, no disrespect, but let's be honest here ... how many of those games do you think your past teams would have won? 4, 5 maybe 6?

Seattle is a fraud team if I ever saw one. Unlike Seattle, KC is a team with a lot of great pieces in place, talent all over the field. Did they overachieve? Hell yeah ... but isn't that everyone's goal heading into the season?

I really think your team is just a few pieces short of having a team where this fraud talk will be long buried.