ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 10 « First 4567 8 910
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   It won't be DeCastro. I'm still betting Kuechly. But here's a dark horse... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=258507)

BossChief 04-18-2012 06:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha (Post 8550732)
You're the one who needs to jump off a building for that suggestion. We all know you are a massive Iowa homer, but how many NFL teams do you know that builds their rosters around back up QBs? McNutt in the 2nd or 3rd? Are you his brother? :thumb:
I'll bet everything I have McNutt doesn't make it out of the third round.

In fact, I bet there is a better chance he goes in the second round than the bottom half of the third round.

My thoughts on McNutt have very little to do with Stanzi.

The kid is gonna be a very dependable clutch player that moves the chains and puts points on the board.

I made it very clear that letting Bowe walk would be a huge mistake, but if we are gonna make that mistake we better at least fill the spot with a good prospect.

I've been talking up MM for three years on here.

whoman69 04-18-2012 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 8545450)
Saints drafted Robert Meachum in the first when they didn't need a WR.

Packers drafted Randall Cobb last year in the 2nd when they didn't need a WR.

Is there any chance you'd argue either of those were poor selections?
Considering who their QBs are, no. Adding another weapon to the arsenal that Cassel can't use...

Titty Meat 04-18-2012 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8552026)
And Reiff could play any position on the O-Line except center.

If you draft him, you get a new starter at guard that all the dumbasses are clamoring for, but a guy that can step outside to LT if the need arises.

And yes, a good backup LT is more valuable than a starter at guard.
He's not near the player DeCastro projects to be.

BossChief 04-18-2012 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8552026)
And Reiff could play any position on the O-Line except center.

If you draft him, you get a new starter at guard that all the dumbasses are clamoring for, but a guy that can step outside to LT if the need arises.

And yes, a good backup LT is more valuable than a starter at guard.
If we have no other options than Reiff, Decastro or Kuechly...I totally agree with you.

That's not the case, though.

Give me Barron and a mid round center.

milkman 04-18-2012 06:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8552035)
He's not near the player DeCastro projects to be.
I'm fully aware of their projections, but I would not ever consider using a top 15 pick on a dedicated guard.

I don't care how you present the argument, and DJ's left nut does the best job at presenting an argument, the fact is, and always will be, that guard is not a difference making position, and you don't use premium picks on that.

Titty Meat 04-18-2012 06:27 PM
It's been reported that Reiff is expected to slip now. Using what Milkman said we'd be better off trading down and getting Cordy Glenn.

Titty Meat 04-18-2012 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8552051)
I'm fully aware of their projections, but I would not ever consider using a top 15 pick on a dedicated guard.

I don't care how you present the argument, and DJ's left nut does the best job at presenting an argument, the fact is, and always will be, that guard is not a difference making position, and you don't use premium picks on that.
It's a safe pick do you think it sets the team back 5 years down the road?

BossChief 04-18-2012 06:33 PM
I'm pretty sure Reiff started every line position at Iowa except center.

This front office LOVES versatility and drafts it at a premium.

Dexter and Arenas are perfect examples of that.

milkman 04-18-2012 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8552052)
It's been reported that Reiff is expected to slip now. Using what Milkman said we'd be better off trading down and getting Cordy Glenn.
Hell, we'd be better off trading down, regardless.

Titty Meat 04-18-2012 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8552061)
Hell, we'd be better off trading down, regardless.
I'm for it unless Ingram or Tannehill are sitting there at 11.

milkman 04-18-2012 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8552055)
It's a safe pick do you think it sets the team back 5 years down the road?
I would always use a premium pick on a player at a difference making position over "safe" picks.

And in today's NFL, there isn't a single pick that will set you back 5 years.

milkman 04-18-2012 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8552065)
I'm for it unless Ingram or Tannehill are sitting there at 11.
As much as I like what Ingram offers to this D, I would still be in favor of trading down.

We agree on Tannehill.

BossChief 04-18-2012 06:36 PM
I'm such an Iowa homer that I called Bulaga falling to the 20s and have said over and over that Reiff will probably slip to a similar spot.

WAYYYY before ANYONE else did in the media.

Titty Meat 04-18-2012 06:38 PM
I saw on Twitter the Jags want to trade out and are hoping we'd trade up to get Tannehill. What would that cost us? A 3rd?

BossChief 04-18-2012 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8552072)
As much as I like what Ingram offers to this D, I would still be in favor of trading down.

We agree on Tannehill.
That Mercilus kid should be in the conversation, as should Barron.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.
Page 8 of 10 « First 4567 8 910
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.