ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Mellinger nails it. Great article. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262826)

jd1020 08-25-2012 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pittsie (Post 8851570)
Regarding RG3, we absolutely had a chance. The Rams needed a #1 CB and WR, and we had both to trade.

:facepalm:

In before the "explain why they traded down to 14" argument.

philfree 08-25-2012 11:55 AM

I think Babby plagiarized this article from Chiefs Planet. It's been written here over and over for the last three plus years so it's not really such a great article.

DaneMcCloud 08-25-2012 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acesn8s (Post 8851084)
Oh god NO. Barkley=Cassel=Sanchez

What?

LMAO

4 year starter versus one year starter versus no starts in four years?

LMAO

Have you even seen Barkley play?

Skyy God 08-25-2012 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8851573)
:facepalm:

In before the "explain why they traded down to 14" argument.

When Sportsshrink is more lucid, you have a problem.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8850768)
I've had a hard time trying to burn Pioli for the QB situation. He tried with Cassel and its not that he wants to live or die with him, its that there hasn't been an opportunity presented to fix the problem. He wanted Manning but Manning didn't want KC for w/e reason. But, if after our 2nd pick in next years draft we don't have a QB, I'll be done. I don't think we'll be in a position to get a top QB but you need 2 hands to count the QBs who have 1st round talent going into the season and they all aren't going to be drafted by the time the Chiefs are on the clock for the 1st and, maybe, 2nd time.


jd1020 08-25-2012 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pittsie (Post 8851589)
When Sportsshrink is more lucid, you have a problem.

When someone thinks that RG3 was a possibility for the Chiefs, you have a problem.

Skyy God 08-25-2012 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8851593)
When someone thinks that RG3 was a possibility for the Chiefs, you have a problem.

So coming up just short in the Luck sweepstakes wasn't also an option??

jd1020 08-25-2012 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pittsie (Post 8851602)
So coming up just short in the Luck sweepstakes wasn't also an option??

Just short? We were 10 picks away.

Skyy God 08-25-2012 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8851606)
Just short? We were 10 picks away.

Try to imagine a 2011 where we didn't shoot for meaningless wins.....

jd1020 08-25-2012 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pittsie (Post 8851614)
Try to imagine a 2011 where we didn't shoot for meaningless wins.....

So meaningless we were a Bowe TD drop away from the playoffs. Or a blocked FG away from the playoffs.

Skyy God 08-25-2012 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8851618)
So meaningless we were a Bowe TD drop away from the playoffs. Or a blocked FG away from the playoffs.

Seriously, GFY.

Who gives a crap about the playoffs. 2010 made it abundantly clear Cassel will be able to engineer exactly zero playoff wins.

jd1020 08-25-2012 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pittsie (Post 8851622)
Seriously, GFY.

Who gives a crap about the playoffs. 2010 made it abundantly clear Cassel will be able to engineer exactly zero playoff wins.

This is why you are stupid.

RealSNR 08-25-2012 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8851588)
What?

LMAO

4 year starter versus one year starter versus no starts in four years?

LMAO

Have you even seen Barkley play?

I saw Matt Leinart play, too.

BossChief 08-25-2012 12:24 PM

Game 6.

Brady might the first shot at being the replacement qb, but I have almost no doubt that Cassel will be pulled and a new quarterback will take over during the bye week.

The Franchise 08-25-2012 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8851624)
This is why you are stupid.

Can you honestly sit there and tell me that you think Cassel is capable of winning a Superbowl for this team?

jd1020 08-25-2012 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8851637)
Can you honestly sit there and tell me that you think Cassel is capable of winning a Superbowl for this team?

What does Cassel have to do with it? Who was the QB to end the season last year?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.