ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 8 « First 4567 8
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Stanzi Supporters Need To Apologize (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262578)

BossChief 08-23-2012 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8841700)
All teams need a developmental QB - at least all SMART teams do. If you want to try and hide him on the PS, go ahead. I'm pretty sure they won't. They like him. They actually like him alot.
Exactly.

Just ask Adam Schefter.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 8845182)
Who is going to make the roster in the place of the 3rd string QB that will put this team over the edge? :doh!:

A team should always have a young QB in the 3 spot that they are developing. Always.
A kickoff specialist? J/K No seriously, who cares? Half the league only goes with two QBs. It only makes since to keep three if you have three good ones.

The truth is that project QBs are a thing of the past. Nobody waits long and guys don't get much time. Most of the teams that have three QBs have veterans. At least half of them do. That means only about 1/4 of teams have project QBs on the active roster.

Look at Pittsburgh. They dropped the kid from Oregon and kept old ass Charlie Batch and Leftwich. Would Chase Daniel be in New Orleans if Mark Brunnell was 5 years younger? The Pats won two superbowls with Flutie and Huard. I guess my point is that most teams that have a project QB are doing so because they have to.

KC is a good team and they are not in a position to need a project QB. Stanzi can sit on the practice squad and work his ass off and maybe one day he will get one more chance.

If Cassel or Quinn don't work out, they will address QB next year. If we get down to our 3rd stringer this year, we are ****ed.

htismaqe 08-23-2012 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845301)
A kickoff specialist? J/K No seriously, who cares? Half the league only goes with two QBs. It only makes since to keep three if you have three good ones.
Or if you finished the previous season starting a guy you got on the waiver wire 2/3 of the way through the season...

CoMoChief 08-23-2012 05:16 PM
the ideal QB situation..

1. Franchise QB
2. Veteran backup
3. Young project w/ upside

If the veteran QB is getting too old, or can't be resigned/decides to go elsewhere, then you replace him with another veteran QB if there is any indication that your 3rd string young project is not quite ready to take snaps with the starters should the #1QB go down.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 05:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8845316)
Or if you finished the previous season starting a guy you got on the waiver wire 2/3 of the way through the season...
Yep. Then you would be very lucky like we were. This regime isn't thinking about project QBs. We are trying to win.

pimpchief 08-23-2012 05:30 PM
I want tanney as our third qb.

jd1020 08-23-2012 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pimpchief (Post 8845386)
I want tanney as our third qb.
I'd like to see what he could do. Apparently you can't tell the difference between him and Stanzi on the practice field. Maybe you can tell the difference in the game.

pimpchief 08-23-2012 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8845390)
I'd like to see what he could do. Apparently you can't tell the difference between him and Stanzi on the practice field. Maybe you can tell the difference in the game.
I really want him to get a chance. Why won't they play him?

aturnis 08-23-2012 05:58 PM
3
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8841636)
Maybe not that one game, but when you look at the other five, I can see it. Remember when we drafted McGee in the 3rd round a couple of years ago and then quickly traded him Tampa after one season? This is the same thing imo. We need to cut our losses and move on. He should be better at this point and he honestly hasn't shown anything. What has he learned? Has he gotten better?

I can't believe some guys say it wasn't that bad! I'm sorry but it was terrible. It's not even Thursday yet and some of you Stanzi sympathizers are already getting beer goggles again. He caused the sacks because he held the ball to long. The pick wasn't flukey at all. He's lucky Copper knocked it away and tried to save him. Otherwise, it might have been gone for a pick six because Copper was double covered and Stanzi blatently stared down the receiver all the way.

In the end, Stanzi doesn't move the ball. You have to move the ball. Thigpen moved the ball. Palko and Croyle did not. Thigpen is still in the league. It's really that simple. If Stanzi is going to make it, he needs to move the damn chains.
You're an idiot. They traded McGee b/c he was a pot head and got busted, not to mention his poor play. Football wasn't important enough to him. There was no place for him on this young roster.

whoman69 08-23-2012 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845301)
A kickoff specialist? J/K No seriously, who cares? Half the league only goes with two QBs. It only makes since to keep three if you have three good ones.

The truth is that project QBs are a thing of the past. Nobody waits long and guys don't get much time. Most of the teams that have three QBs have veterans. At least half of them do. That means only about 1/4 of teams have project QBs on the active roster.

Look at Pittsburgh. They dropped the kid from Oregon and kept old ass Charlie Batch and Leftwich. Would Chase Daniel be in New Orleans if Mark Brunnell was 5 years younger? The Pats won two superbowls with Flutie and Huard. I guess my point is that most teams that have a project QB are doing so because they have to.

KC is a good team and they are not in a position to need a project QB. Stanzi can sit on the practice squad and work his ass off and maybe one day he will get one more chance.

If Cassel or Quinn don't work out, they will address QB next year. If we get down to our 3rd stringer this year, we are ****ed.
Cassel and Quinn are already pretty much proven failures. That's why we need a developmental QB. What's the difference between KC and the teams you mention? They have a franchise QB. As you pointed out with your examples, they have 3 QBs even though they don't have a developmental guy on their roster. If any team needs a project QB, its KC.

Bewbies 08-23-2012 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8845469)
Cassel and Quinn are already pretty much proven failures. That's why we need a developmental QB. What's the difference between KC and the teams you mention? They have a franchise QB. As you pointed out with your examples, they have 3 QBs even though they don't have a developmental guy on their roster. If any team needs a project QB, its KC.
No kidding, we have a young development behind 2 gigantic turds.

BossChief 08-23-2012 06:10 PM
There is no way Stanzi would make it to the practice squad.

Regardless of what some of you think, the organization is really high on Stanzi.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 06:49 PM
You guys are really going to hate this but, Cassel is about to be a franchise QB. After this season, he's going to get locked up. He's on the verge of a career season and a playoff win. I really believe that. He's got a good o-line, the best WR corps in the league, the best rb tandem in league, the best TE tandem in the league, and he has the ability to change the play at the line of scrimmage.

I don't really like the guy but I can see him hitting it big this year. After this year, I dunno what he will do? However, I do think this is his year. He's had two good years and two bad years. It is what it is guys.

Matt cassel is going to be our QB for a while and that is as real as I can say it.

jd1020 08-23-2012 06:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845608)
You guys are really going to hate this but, Cassel is about to be a franchise QB. After this season, he's going to get locked up. He's on the verge of a career season and a playoff win. I really believe that. He's got a good o-line, the best WR corps in the league, the best rb tandem in league, the best TE tandem in the league, and he has the ability to change the play at the line of scrimmage.

I don't really like the guy but I can see him hitting it big this year. After this year, I dunno what he will do? However, I do think this is his year. He's had two good years and two bad years. It is what it is guys.

Matt cassel is going to be our QB for a while and that is as real as I can say it.
I'd take Gronkowski and Hernandez over our TE's.

BossChief 08-23-2012 06:55 PM
Cassel is "locked up" for the next three seasons of what was a front loaded deal.

I dont know why some of you fools keep saying Cassel will get an extension if he has a good year like he is in the last year of his current contract or something.

Bewbies 08-23-2012 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845608)
You guys are really going to hate this but, Cassel is about to be a franchise QB. After this season, he's going to get locked up. He's on the verge of a career season and a playoff win. I really believe that. He's got a good o-line, the best WR corps in the league, the best rb tandem in league, the best TE tandem in the league, and he has the ability to change the play at the line of scrimmage.
LMAO

Please reference this link once the season gets going.

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:01 PM
Cassel will step up into the "franchise quarterback" category when:

He goes through all of his progressions on every play
Learns to "feel the pressure" without looking at it.
Stops feeling phantom pressure.
Learns to keep his eyes downfield even when he decides to move with the ball
Starts to throw the passes that win games against better quarterbacked Teams....passes over 20 yards...he needs to just chuck it up to Bowe and Baldwin 6 or 7 times every game just to keep the defense honest
Develops better instincts for the position
Starts taking responsibility in post game interviews, instead of deflecting.
Shows some poise and starts delivering strikes KNOWING HE WILL GET HIT AFTER HE THROWS.
Gets a lot better on third down.

I could probably go on, but you get the point.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 8845624)
Definately :toast:

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8845640)
Cassel will step up into the "franchise quarterback" category when:

He goes through all of his progressions on every play
Learns to "feel the pressure" without looking at it.
Stops feeling phantom pressure.
Learns to keep his eyes downfield even when he decides to move with the ball
Starts to throw the passes that win games against better quarterbacked Teams....passes over 20 yards...he needs to just chuck it up to Bowe and Baldwin 6 or 7 times every game just to keep the defense honest
Develops better instincts for the position
Starts taking responsibility in post game interviews, instead of deflecting.
Shows some poise and starts delivering strikes KNOWING HE WILL GET HIT AFTER HE THROWS.
Gets a lot better on third down.

I could probably go on, but you get the point.
You are to caught up in the bullshit. He just have to win more than lose, win some close ones, and win a playoff game. The rest doesn't matter.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8845623)
Cassel is "locked up" for the next three seasons of what was a front loaded deal.

I dont know why some of you fools keep saying Cassel will get an extension if he has a good year like he is in the last year of his current contract or something.
You are right. I thought it was only good through 2013. It's good until 2014. Sorry about that.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8845617)
I'd take Gronkowski and Hernandez over our TE's.
LOL I forgot about them.... How about the second or third best?

whoman69 08-23-2012 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845608)
You guys are really going to hate this but, Cassel is about to be a franchise QB. After this season, he's going to get locked up. He's on the verge of a career season and a playoff win. I really believe that. He's got a good o-line, the best WR corps in the league, the best rb tandem in league, the best TE tandem in the league, and he has the ability to change the play at the line of scrimmage.

I don't really like the guy but I can see him hitting it big this year. After this year, I dunno what he will do? However, I do think this is his year. He's had two good years and two bad years. It is what it is guys.

Matt cassel is going to be our QB for a while and that is as real as I can say it.
I don't believe that you believe anything that you are saying.

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845682)
LOL I forgot about them.... How about the second or third best?
Not a chance.

Moeaki needs to show he is back to his former self and Maneri needs to show that he can do what he has done in preseason consistently in real games before I would even put them in the top 7 or 8 tight end groups in the league.

I think After the year is over, we will loook at them as a top 5 unit or so FWIW.

whoman69 08-23-2012 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845675)
You are to caught up in the bullshit. He just have to win more than lose, win some close ones, and win a playoff game. The rest doesn't matter.
Without doing things correctly, he isn't going to get to that goal. He can't continue to be Check Down and be successful.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8845689)
I don't believe that you believe anything that you are saying.
I absolutely believe it man. I just drafted him on my fantasy team about an hour ago and I'm not ****ing with you. He's a pretty blah QB but he is going to have a career year. You heard it here first.

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845675)
You are to caught up in the bullshit. He just have to win more than lose, win some close ones, and win a playoff game. The rest doesn't matter.
Bullshit, that is a good list of EXACTLY what Cassel needs to do if this team is gonna have a chance at winning big games in the playoffs.

Thus far, that is an accurate list of his precise weaknesses.

Mr_Tomahawk 08-23-2012 07:19 PM
What's going on here...?

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:20 PM
Unfortunately, there is probably a better chance of either Boss/Moeaki ending the year on IR than there is of both still being active and healthy after the last game.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8845705)
What's going on here...?
Stanzi Good

Cassel Bad

Same old same old.

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8845705)
What's going on here...?
Were having pie, want a slice?

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8845709)
Unfortunately, there is probably a better chance of either Boss/Moeaki ending the year on IR than there is of both still being active and healthy after the last game.
I could see it. Boss is going to play a big role this year for sure. He will be the #1 and will get some catches.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8845711)
Were having pie, want a slice?
Punch and Pie!!!

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845710)
Stanzi Good

Cassel Bad

Same old same old.
Actually, Cassel looks improved.

If he makes it out of the opening stretch .500, he could make a push in the last 10 games.

When you get some time, go through the threads Ive started on here about Cassel over the years. Ive been VERY fair with the player...given him praise and pointed out along the way when I saw precise improvements...but Im not gonna stick my head in the sand when it comes to his failures, either.

DaneMcCloud 08-23-2012 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8845503)
There is no way Stanzi would make it to the practice squad.
He was a fifth round pick that hasn't played in regular season game and hasn't shown much of anything in the preseason to date. What team is going to cut their third stringer in favor of Stanzi?

Mr_Tomahawk 08-23-2012 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8845726)
He was a fifth round pick that hasn't played in regular season game and hasn't shown much of anything in the preseason to date. What team is going to cut their third stringer in favor of Stanzi?
:clap:

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8845726)
He was a fifth round pick that hasn't played in regular season game and hasn't shown much of anything in the preseason to date. What team is going to cut their third stringer in favor of Stanzi?
Hopefully, we dont have to find out.

Im not gonna do the legwork to give you a list of speculated teams with a need for a QB prospect.

Sorry

All I can say is that one of them would claim him.

It doesnt matter, anyway.

The Organization is high on the kid and I would be completely shocked if he gets put on waivers/cut.

You would have to think that even if a solid vet becomes available and the Chiefs decided to sign him, it would be to replace the other veteran in Quinn.

Romeo has said he wants three quarterbacks.

Starter, vet, developmental.

This was around the draft when he made the comment about not being interested in any quarterbacks after say 2 because none of the rest of them would be a better developmental guy than Stanzi is.

No reason to keep 3 vets.

aturnis 08-23-2012 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8841636)
Maybe not that one game, but when you look at the other five, I can see it. Remember when we drafted McGee in the 3rd round a couple of years ago and then quickly traded him Tampa after one season? This is the same thing imo. We need to cut our losses and move on. He should be better at this point and he honestly hasn't shown anything. What has he learned? Has he gotten better?

I can't believe some guys say it wasn't that bad! I'm sorry but it was terrible. It's not even Thursday yet and some of you Stanzi sympathizers are already getting beer goggles again. He caused the sacks because he held the ball to long. The pick wasn't flukey at all. He's lucky Copper knocked it away and tried to save him. Otherwise, it might have been gone for a pick six because Copper was double covered and Stanzi blatently stared down the receiver all the way.

In the end, Stanzi doesn't move the ball. You have to move the ball. Thigpen moved the ball. Palko and Croyle did not. Thigpen is still in the league. It's really that simple. If Stanzi is going to make it, he needs to move the damn chains.
Two of the four sacks were on Stanzi. Period. The other two were on the Oline, guys having hands on Stanzi in less than 3 seconds.

As far as the interception is concerned. I know you won't b/c you're a dumbass, but if you watch the replay from the rear angle it's obvious pass interference. The db tries to put his hand around Coppers waist to help position himself(which itself is pass interference) but gets a hold of Copper's left elbow in the process not allowing Copper to catch the ball. If Coppers left arm is free, it's most likely an easy catch, and if the db's doesn't put his arm around Copper illegally at all, he never gets into position to bat the ball away. Stanzi's throw was perfect.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:44 PM
After last year, there is plenty of reason to keep three vets. Take Chicago for example. They signed Campbell and McCown after their QB debacle last year. I would like to us get a third so we don't have to sign one off the street again.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 8845774)
Two of the four sacks were on Stanzi. Period. The other two were on the Oline, guys having hands on Stanzi in less than 3 seconds.

As far as the interception is concerned. I know you won't b/c you're a dumbass, but if you watch the replay from the rear angle it's obvious pass interference. The db tries to put his hand around Coppers waist to help position himself(which itself is pass interference) but gets a hold of Copper's left elbow in the process not allowing Copper to catch the ball. If Coppers left arm is free, it's most likely an easy catch, and if the db's doesn't put his arm around Copper illegally at all, he never gets into position to bat the ball away. Stanzi's throw was perfect.
Two of the four sacks were on Stanzi? How many would there have been in four quarters? The corner was cheating? Listen to yourself man. It's NFL and Stanzi is going to have to overcome that shit if he wants to play.

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845777)
After last year, there is plenty of reason to keep three vets. Take Chicago for example. They signed Campbell and McCown after their QB debacle last year. I would like to us get a third so we don't have to sign one off the street again.
Some ****ers are always trying to skate uphill.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8845787)
Some ****ers are always trying to skate uphill.
LOL Alright, I'll quit.

BossChief 08-23-2012 07:53 PM
I suggest you just read for awhile and learn how this place rolls, dude.

You are digging a hole that is close to the point of no return at this point.

Black Bob 08-23-2012 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8845804)
I suggest you just read for awhile and learn how this place rolls, dude.

You are digging a hole that is close to the point of no return at this point.
Ok, what am I doing wrong? Saying what I think? Speaking the truth? Not kissing ass? Not calling people names enough? Posting quality unbiased stuff from a non-homer point of view? Talking about real football instead of making excuses? Is this some kind of threat? Are you and your buddies going to gang up on me and have a boot party? I see alot of people kicking others when they're on the ground.

aturnis 08-23-2012 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha (Post 8845152)
When he has time, Stanzi throws a very pretty ball. The problems come when there is ANY pressure near him. I have no dog in this fight...I really don't care who KC's QB is and who it isn't. I honestly don't think that Stanzi has the courage or the fortitude required to be a full-time QB in the NFL.

He has the ability/talent...which is why this is frustrating.
I agree and disagree. I don't think Stanzi is ready, but it isn't a courage issue. Stanzi stands tall in the pocket and makes throws when he knows that he's going to get hit. Problem is, when everything turns to shit, he is lost right now. I believe that to be an issue of not knowing the playbook forward and back.

Stanzi hasn't yet had the luxury of learning umpteen new offenses in the NFL, so it's harder for him to learn a new offense in a short time not yet learning how to do that. Not only that, but everything that transfers from one offense to another, just different terminology.

Stanzi seems to be behind in the classroom, and things break down, he doesn't seem to know exactly where his help is supposed to be. Result, he panics.

With time, he will be fine. He proved a film rat at Iowa, and made huge improvements from his junior to his senior year. He's the type of guy I can see benefitting greatly from the ipad interactive playbooks. Which the team is rumored to be interested in switching to.

SAUTO 08-23-2012 08:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845818)
Ok, what am I doing wrong? Saying what I think? Speaking the truth? Not kissing ass? Not calling people names enough? Posting quality unbiased stuff from a non-homer point of view? Talking about real football instead of making excuses? Is this some kind of threat? Are you and your buddies going to gang up on me and have a boot party? I see alot of people kicking others when they're on the ground.
Oh shut the **** up.

You make some good points.

but it's rare, usually you sound like a ****ing idiot.

"quality unbiased stuff?" go **** your mother.
Posted via Mobile Device

Black Bob 08-23-2012 08:36 PM
Why don't go stick your monkey wrench up your ass ****stick. I bet your fingers are nice and oily. Just right to slide it up in there. If you're lucky, you might even be able to get one of the other Pep Boys to do it for you. You're just another whiney bitch who needs to get laid. Don't you belong over there on one of those soft porn threads? Or, are you a man hunter Mr. Monkeywrench?

aturnis 08-23-2012 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845912)
Why don't go stick your monkey wrench up your ass ****stick. I bet your fingers are nice and oily. Just right to slide it up in there. If you're lucky, you might even be able to get one of the other Pep Boys to do it for you. You're just another whiney bitch who needs to get laid. Don't you belong over there on one of those soft porn threads? Or, are you a man hunter Mr. Monkeywrench?
Monkey wrench? Make assumptions much? 'Spose you're racist too?

Fact is, your views do suck most time. It's football, yes, but the athletes aren't machines, therefore, things aren't black and white.

Answer me a question dickbag, how many times have you watched game 2?

SAUTO 08-23-2012 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845912)
Why don't go stick your monkey wrench up your ass ****stick. I bet your fingers are nice and oily. Just right to slide it up in there. If you're lucky, you might even be able to get one of the other Pep Boys to do it for you. You're just another whiney bitch who needs to get laid. Don't you belong over there on one of those soft porn threads? Or, are you a man hunter Mr. Monkeywrench?
quit projecting your fantasies on me bitch.

i dont whine and i get laid pretty often these days...

SAUTO 08-23-2012 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 8846076)
Monkey wrench? Make assumptions much? 'Spose you're racist too?

Fact is, your views do suck most time. It's football, yes, but the athletes aren't machines, therefore, things aren't black and white.

Answer me a question dickbag, how many times have you watched game 2?
next thing he will be making fun of my eyes...

rico 08-23-2012 10:11 PM
Not sure if the Romeo on Stanzi quote has been posted yet:

"It's always tough to get a true evaluation with the circumstances the way they were," Crennel said. "Some of the protection he had wasn't as good as it could have been. But he tried to run the offense. Maybe he wasn't as solid as he normally is, but in looking at the things he did and the things he's capable of doing ... he was looking at the right places but there were times he wasn't able to deliver the ball because somebody was in his face and now he pulled it down and things happened."

Pretty consistent with what some posters are saying.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rico (Post 8846328)
Not sure if the Romeo on Stanzi quote has been posted yet:

"It's always tough to get a true evaluation with the circumstances the way they were," Crennel said. "Some of the protection he had wasn't as good as it could have been. But he tried to run the offense. Maybe he wasn't as solid as he normally is, but in looking at the things he did and the things he's capable of doing ... he was looking at the right places but there were times he wasn't able to deliver the ball because somebody was in his face and now he pulled it down and things happened."

Pretty consistent with what some posters are saying.
GAME 6

BossChief 08-23-2012 10:14 PM
I am not an old, fat, black man...but I think he just said what I did.

Doesnt sound like they are faulting Stanzi much.

I hope he gets enough looks to be able to overcome that rams game.

BossChief 08-23-2012 11:24 PM
Cordell Cordell ‏@TheFilmRoom

#Chiefs what I want to see from Stanzi is a more conservative approach. Take the check down, go with the first read, make the easy play.

Cordell ‏@TheFilmRoom

@chrisisknitting not baby steps, that's QBing in the NFL...the best make a living with short/intermediate routes.

Cordell ‏@TheFilmRoom

@chrisisknitting that's been my contention with Stanzi...he rarely operates in that area, Cassel rarely operates outside that area.

htismaqe 08-24-2012 06:13 AM
And that right there is why I've pretty much given up on Stanzi starting, or really replacing Cassel in general.

That's PRECISELY what the Chiefs want to see from him too - they want him to be more like Cassel.

I'm telling you, they think Matt Cassel is the IDEAL QB.

Reerun_KC 08-24-2012 07:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8846558)
Cordell Cordell ‏@TheFilmRoom

#Chiefs what I want to see from Stanzi is a more conservative approach. Take the check down, go with the first read, make the easy play.

Cordell ‏@TheFilmRoom

@chrisisknitting not baby steps, that's QBing in the NFL...the best make a living with short/intermediate routes.

Cordell ‏@TheFilmRoom

@chrisisknitting that's been my contention with Stanzi...he rarely operates in that area, Cassel rarely operates outside that area.
Dude you need to change your avatar... Keep thinking you are Claythan... Which is killing your credibility, coolness factor and style points.

Are you gay or something?

htismaqe 08-24-2012 07:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8846901)
Dude you need to change your avatar... Keep thinking you are Claythan... Which is killing your credibility, coolness factor and style points.
ROFL

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=193

:thumb:

Reerun_KC 08-24-2012 07:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8846820)
And that right there is why I've pretty much given up on Stanzi starting, or really replacing Cassel in general.

That's PRECISELY what the Chiefs want to see from him too - they want him to be more like Cassel.

I'm telling you, they think Matt Cassel is the IDEAL QB.
He might be for what they are trying to do. Even though we break down gif images based on pure speculation. There isnt one person here that know what the **** the Chiefs want their QB to do. NOT ONE....

So unless someone comes up with real information from Pioli or Dabbol himself, then its nothing more than message board fillers.

Reerun_KC 08-24-2012 07:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8846908)
:clap:

Well Played Sir

htismaqe 08-24-2012 07:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8846925)
He might be for what they are trying to do. Even though we break down gif images based on pure speculation. There isnt one person here that know what the **** the Chiefs want their QB to do. NOT ONE....

So unless someone comes up with real information from Pioli or Dabbol himself, then its nothing more than message board fillers.
I think it's safe for all of us to ASSUME we know what the Chiefs want their QB to do.

Otherwise, Cassel wouldn't still be the starter. :)

Reerun_KC 08-24-2012 09:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8846930)
I think it's safe for all of us to ASSUME we know what the Chiefs want their QB to do.

Otherwise, Cassel wouldn't still be the starter. :)
Assuming never leads to anything productive.

Black Bob 08-24-2012 09:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 8846076)
Monkey wrench? Make assumptions much? 'Spose you're racist too?

Fact is, your views do suck most time. It's football, yes, but the athletes aren't machines, therefore, things aren't black and white.

Answer me a question dickbag, how many times have you watched game 2?
**** you Stanzi Pants. You are probably one of those white collar guys who couldn't handle a monkey wrench. Just go ahead and use an ink pen cock licker. Oh yeah, **** you for calling me racist.

loochy 08-24-2012 09:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8847205)
**** you Stanzi Pants. You are probably one of those white collar guys who couldn't handle a monkey wrench. Just go ahead and use an ink pen cock licker.
Stanzi will eat your babies

Black Bob 08-24-2012 09:26 AM
Don't you need to get back to Sweatin' to the Oldies bitch? I know you are excited about seeing Stanzi in the hot pants tonight but, get back to work.

milkman 08-24-2012 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8847205)
**** you Stanzi Pants. You are probably one of those white collar guys who couldn't handle a monkey wrench. Just go ahead and use an ink pen cock licker.
Here's something I have never understood.

If you can't handle a monkey wrench, then you can't understand the game of football?

And if you are a cock licker, you also can't understand football?

loochy 08-24-2012 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8847216)
And if you are a cock licker, you also can't understand football?
i dont understand football if that means anything to you

Black Bob 08-24-2012 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8847216)
Here's something I have never understood.

If you can't handle a monkey wrench, then you can't understand the game of football?

And if you are a cock licker, you also can't understand football?
I don't understand it either dumbass.

milkman 08-24-2012 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 8847220)
i dont understand football if that means anything to you
So are you monkey wrench challenged or a cock licker?

loochy 08-24-2012 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8847234)
So are you monkey wrench challenged or a cock licker?
of all people YOU should know which one

;););)

milkman 08-24-2012 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8847232)
I don't understand it either dumbass.
See post 627.

Same question.

ToxSocks 08-24-2012 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 8847239)
of all people YOU should know which one

;););)
You mother ****er...

loochy 08-24-2012 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Macho Man (Post 8847243)
You mother ****er...
ROFLROFLROFL

Black Bob 08-24-2012 09:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8847241)
See post 627.

Same question.
I'm a monkey wrench licker.

milkman 08-24-2012 09:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8847246)
I'm a monkey wrench licker.
Before or after use?

stevenidol 08-24-2012 09:38 AM
Stanzi loves 'Merica though so he can't be that bad. I think a lot of the guys love his long hair too, so it makes up for passes that are 5 feet from the nearest receiver.

ToxSocks 08-24-2012 09:39 AM
Don't let this despicable creature soil my good name.

loochy 08-24-2012 09:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Macho Man (Post 8847252)
Don't let this despicable creature soil my good name.
I only wish to spread the gospel of Richard Simmons

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-24-2012 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8846820)
And that right there is why I've pretty much given up on Stanzi starting, or really replacing Cassel in general.

That's PRECISELY what the Chiefs want to see from him too - they want him to be more like Cassel.

I'm telling you, they think Matt Cassel is the IDEAL QB.
That would really help matters!

Rausch 08-24-2012 12:09 PM
Stanzi was given a great big audition in week 2 and he $#it his pants.

Back to 3 fella'...

whoman69 08-24-2012 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8847178)
Assuming never leads to anything productive.
When Scott Pioli is GM, all you can do is assume. He's afraid the fans might be enemy infiltrators.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 PM.
Page 8 of 8 « First 4567 8
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.