keg in kc |
11-10-2013 01:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city
(Post 10174185)
I think, with great coaching, you can win without great talent. I'm not sure the other way is really the case.
|
I don't think you really find all that many cases where you so clearly have one without the other.
I think what we're seeing here in KC is more of the difference between good coaching and awful coaching, as well as momentum for and momentum against. I remember saying during the offseason how I thought this should have been a 6-7 win team last year, and was coached down/snowballed its way to 2-14, and that's why I thought they'd have a .500 or better season this year. Obviously the start is greater than that but at the end of the day what we're seeing is a combination of both great coaching and great talent. I think the key is the coaching making the talent believe it can win. Which is not a mindset we've had since the 90s, even during Vermeil's years you could see a sort of "here we go again" thing during games.
But we've taken a pretty wide sidetrack here....
|