ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I Predict The 2013 QB's To Be (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268468)

Exoter175 01-04-2013 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9283595)
I'll lifelong ban bet you that Stanzi doesn't start a single regular season NFL game this year...on ANY team.

Why would I do that? Nobody is going to start him this year because nobody knows if he can play, because the geniuses in our front office believe that you should play to win every game and never play guys at the tail end of a losing season so you can evaluate them in an actual game environment. Even when we're losing 300 to 3.
Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 9283597)
Heard at least 2 national dudes talk about Reid fixing Casshole today

Nothing but Fluff. The second coming of Donovan McNabb is in this draft, you bet your ass the Walrus snags him.

CaliforniaChief 01-04-2013 10:34 PM

1. Geno Smith

2. Jason Campbell

3. E.J. Manuel

CaliforniaChief 01-04-2013 10:34 PM

People in the media don't know anything about the situation. I heard one guy talk about Romeo coming back as a DC. I almost crashed my truck laughing.

jd1020 01-04-2013 10:35 PM

Quinn played behind the same "shitty" line and didn't look anywhere near as incompetent as Stanzi.

jd1020 01-04-2013 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 9283612)
1. Geno Smith

2. Jason Campbell

3. E.J. Manuel

That's a lot of chocolate.

Exoter175 01-04-2013 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 9283617)
People in the media don't know anything about the situation. I heard one guy talk about Romeo coming back as a DC. I almost crashed my truck laughing.

He was seen walking into the the Chiefs compound today, completely serious.

He must have forgotten to pickup that wrapper.

DeezNutz 01-04-2013 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9283574)
It isn't hard to google it yourself, hey look, first thing I found on it.

Perhaps the second thing you find will actually support your initial claim.

Exoter175 01-04-2013 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9283639)
Perhaps the second thing you find will actually support your initial claim.

That made no sense.........

If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

jd1020 01-04-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9283710)
That made no sense.........

If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

Are you capable of saying anything intelligent?

Orton was already on the roster nursing an injured finger. The only reason Stanzi was considered was because he wasn't sure that Orton would be ready and Palko started his last game when Haley went bye bye.

keg in kc 01-04-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9283710)
If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

Your question answers itself.

DeezNutz 01-04-2013 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9283710)
That made no sense.........

If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

It made perfect sense if you're following what you're typing.

According to you, RAC wanted to start Stanzi, but Pioli said, "**** that."

OK, prove it. A link stating that RAC was contemplating Stanzi in week 15, which was complete bullshit had you actually listened to the presser that week, doesn't prove that Pioli pulled the plug.

Pioli said no, even though RAC had already benched Pioli's son? Makes sense. It's logical, despite the total lack of evidence.

CaliforniaChief 01-04-2013 10:58 PM

I'm a Hawkeyes fan. I loved Stanzi. I loved watching the Chiefs draft him. There's no way anyone can seriously and with any hint of intelligence believe that he has an NFL future.

This ain't your Ferentz's Chiefs.

MahiMike 01-04-2013 11:00 PM

I could see Cassel as a very decent backup but not in KC.

I'm guessing we get Dorsey ergo we sign Matt Flynn.

1. Flynn
2. Quinn
3. Tyler Bray

jd1020 01-04-2013 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9283762)
I could see Cassel as a very decent backup but not in KC.

I'm guessing we get Dorsey ergo we sign Matt Flynn.

1. Flynn
2. Quinn
3. Tyler Bray

One man's trash is another mans trash is another mans treasure.

http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia...5/5c/Vomit.gif

DeezNutz 01-04-2013 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9283762)
I could see Cassel as a very decent backup but not in KC.

I'm guessing we get Dorsey ergo we sign Matt Flynn.

1. Flynn
2. Quinn
3. Tyler Bray

LMAO. We might get Flynn, but there's really no way in **** that Quinn stays on this roster as the #2 QB.

Hell, I'd be completely fine with a QB of Cassel's caliber as the backup. His contract means this won't happen, but he's still ridiculously better than Quinn.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.