yeah, and you're a blind homer...

worse, you're an optimistic blind homer... :p :p :p

<i>IMO Parcells has done a shit job coaching the Cowboys so at this point I wouldn't hang my hat on anything he does or doesn't do. He's the biggest coaching disapointment of 2004 IMO.</i>

I wasn't commenting on his results. I was commenting on the fact that he sees a problem and is taking steps to solve it. It may turn out that he's the problem but at least he's moving to try and resolve things. DV is apparently oblivious to the problem.

Nor do I.

yeah, it's not like you don't have lots of practice... :D :D :D

what? did you make a new year's resolution to keep yourself clean this year?

ROFL ROFL ROFL

ROFL

I'm sure it wasn't funny when it happened. But, damn!!

It should be a huge friggen red flag that Guinta has had Bartee and Battle at corner and NEITHER of them have gotten any better.

Vermeil is such a damn idiot. Martz had to drag old ass Bud Carson out of retirement to attempt to fix all of Guinta's screwups, but he helped win a SB ring so he's a god in Vermeil's eyes.

The KC media should get some balls and blast this organization at every turn. But they won't because the Chiefs run their organization like a big fish in a small pond.

Nah. I was fooling around since the infamous (I guess) leg washing thread. IYRC, my brother had just had surgery and the doctors told him that he wouldn't be able to bend down to wash his legs, or some such sh*t.

Hence, the thread. But, no, I don't wash my legs every day. Probably every third day, on average.

It's inevitable. It's just like the Packers. The only pro sports competition is the freaking Royals...

ROFL ROFL ROFL

you know you'll never live down that leg washing thread, don't you? :D :D :D

But they treat the media like scum if they say one bad thing about the Chiefs, which is why I think the media in KC is too light on the FO, Peterson and Vermeil.

Look at 810's relationship with Peterson as a prime example before Vermeil came along.

"We know from email and our surveys that readers of the official site of the Chiefs tend to be independent thinkers who resist the cynicism coming from the usual places. While they are generally disposed to display a pro-Chiefs stance, they still like to make up their minds and want clear, evidence-based articles and opinions that often times ignore what is appearing in the conventional media."

Heh. Probably not.