ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Is Damon Huard likely to be the odd man out? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=142573)

Wile_E_Coyote 06-21-2006 12:57 PM

sadly, I can remember reading on this forum the wonders of one Johnathon Quinn

Moooo 06-21-2006 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaz

I doubt that Edwards would go into the season with no veteran backup.

Either Printers or Croyle will go to the practice squad and we will probably lose him.

xoxo~
Gaz
Not used to having too many QBOTF candidates on the roster.

But the article says that they will not be cutting either. That's the whole thing. They are elegible for practice squad, but being cut they are open to be taken (which they will in this league). Huard isn't eligible for the practice squad, and I don't know why you'd put him there (the only good he does is as 2nd back).

Moooo

RockChalk 06-21-2006 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Finally, we're getting somewhere. First a paragraph that pretty much proves you completely misunderstood GoChiefs' point.

And then a follow-up paragraph whining about being oppressed by users with 50k posts, as if that's the reason you look like a dumbass.

I do happen to get GoChiefs' point. He thinks that those are good stats for a backup guy coming off the bench. I don't agree and believe it as a fluke, thus, they DON'T IMPRESS me.

And I'm not worried about you thinking I'm a dumbass, trust me. Knowing that you're a mod or admin, I'm sure you get off on screwing around with NOOBs all the time. I'd even venture a guess that you talk about ChiefsPlanet to others at your work or in your family that could care less what posters have to say about various subjects, yet humor you, because they are your friends.

Mr. Laz 06-21-2006 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
The second would be if you agree with Laz. :D

don't you have a BBS to work on?! :spock:


















dirty bastige :p

greg63 06-21-2006 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coryt
good call

...on his Nextell.

Hammock Parties 06-21-2006 01:01 PM

How are those numbers not good off the bench?

2:1 TD to INT ratio.

4-1 record as a starter.

Yeah, HORRIBLE.

Moooo 06-21-2006 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
How are those numbers not good off the bench?

2:1 TD to INT ratio.

4-1 record as a starter.

Yeah, HORRIBLE.

I hear what you're saying, but even Aaron Brooks had a good year... There's plenty of QBs who have that one stellar year then dissappear.

Moooo

rad 06-21-2006 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
In his one season of real action in Miami, he had a 79.8 QBR, 8 TDs, and 4 INTs. That's a far cry better than Printers or Croyle.

That's not even a valid argument. You're smarter than that.

You can't use NFL stats to compare against 2 guys that don't have any.

You think Huard will save the season if Trent goes down? Or you would just "feel" better with a vet in there?

Between those 3 guys, if Trent goes down were ****ed. I think letting 2 young guys battle it out
is better than taking a chance on letting a potential star go.

FAX 06-21-2006 01:05 PM

So, Mr. GoChiefs, are you saying that you would keep Huard? Maybe I'm missing your point here. Like say ...

1. Green tweaks an ankle kicking Turley's ass for not pass blocking and is out for a few games?

2. Green breaks his pelvis while demonstrating proper squat thrust technique to the Mamba and is out for the season?

FAX

RockChalk 06-21-2006 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
How are those numbers not good off the bench?

2:1 TD to INT ratio.

4-1 record as a starter.

Yeah, HORRIBLE.

They don't impress be bud, so get off of it.

Or because I'm new around here, should I be submissive and bow my head to the almighty veteran and strip myself of the ability to have an opinion.

Mr. Laz 06-21-2006 01:08 PM

i hope the chiefs commit heavily to Croyle


i want them to go into the season with the idea that he is gonna have to play at some point.


imo the attitude of a team about a young player often determines the success that players has.


push,push,push ...... Croyle should be our #2 by the time the season starts.

Hammock Parties 06-21-2006 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX
So, Mr. GoChiefs, are you saying that you would keep Huard?

Yes.

Hammock Parties 06-21-2006 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DubbleDownBKU
They don't impress be bud, so get off of it.

Or because I'm new around here, should I be submissive and bow my head to the almighty veteran and strip myself of the ability to have an opinion.

Why don't they impress you?

And no, you shouldn't be submissive. What you could try to do is present some facts that back up your position other than "uhhh...I watched Huard."

FAX 06-21-2006 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Yes.

In both scenarios?

FAX

Kylo Ren 06-21-2006 01:11 PM

Ditch Huard. Carry Croyle and Printers on the roster. If Green goes down to injury, we're screwed no matter if the QB is Huard, Printers or Croyle. We might as well have the two rookies on the roster and let them develop. One of them, hopefully Croyle, will be our QBotF.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.