Ok so your argument is, "Our front office is ****ing dumb"

I don't look at it that way.

I view him as a player that has the ability to dominate at the next level. He has such great versitility, you can line him up at either the 4-3 or 3-4 he gives you many options on defense, and imo will change the face of a defense, a guy you can build around. He is a rare talent coming out.

I haven't seen anybody with that kinda size to have both the combination of great strength, power and explosiveness like he has. Plus, he uses his hands very very well. The dude can disengage well at the point of attack and shed blocks. He plays like a men amongst boys at the collegiate level, I can only imagine what he is going to do at the pro level. I think he has the most important attributes that are necessary for DL to be great. Add to the fact he has a nastiness and mean streak about him better than most lineman that are coming out. I think he is the best player in the draft.

i could care less what buffalo did. the POINT IS that this regime is different. you cant say what will happen with ANY amount of certainty. same as the different regime in buffalo.

Who?
Who is this "some of you" you are imagining that wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a rookie in his first year and an NFL vet who has regressed?

It's easy to make up scenerios when you use the vagueness you employ here.

No matter what happens this is going to be an ugly place the night they draft the first round. I love it.

No, my argument is that Pioli will take who he wants, not who was mocked to him by Todd McShay.

If they don't view Safety as a position worth investing that high on, it very well could be Dan Williams. You say that they want to hedge their bets with Cassel, but why wouldn't they do the same with Tyson Jackson (even if the thought of taking another defensive lineman makes me want to vomit)?

I'm firmly aboard the Berry bandwagon, but I wouldn't be shocked to see them take the other Tennessee player.

i think he was talking about writers and people around the NFL, not message board gurus

Suh would be a waste of a pick. He's not a NT and we already drafted two 3-4 DEs. And I don't see us going to a 4-3 if we draft him.

Trading for someone elses backup QB is the shit Carl did for 20 years, how hard is that to understand.

I'm sure there would be a number of people pissed off if we took Sanchez and he had a poor first year. There would be people still calling for us to draft Clausen and have them both compete.

Hell, there have been people saying that we should draft a QB early every year until we find the right one, even though each one will only get 1 season to start.

Sorry I don't remember everybody's name and exactly what they post. I'll be sure to try harder.

Most of the people who absolutely despise Cassel would be a lot more patient with a rookie QB.

28 year olds don't get the same time or patience as rookies do that's completely different. You move on a guy Cassel's age that's a win now player, he's expected to be good right now.

That's basically comparing apples to oranges, if Sanchez plays 6 years and never improves then that's a problem.

i think everyone understands that, SOME just dont think we can assume that will be the status quo after ONE YEAR.

I don't even get your argument, what is it?

Hey we traded for Cassel but we might draft a QB someday!

Its worst than status quo, Pioli made moves last year that would make Carl look like a HOF GM.

No, but there's actually a guy that will be there that's a legit player and a player of glaring need on this team.