![]() |
Quote:
Berry was a better choice for the Chiefs and their defense but Earl Thomas has been nothing but solid for the Seahawks. |
So would you trade them?
Quote:
|
Quote:
What kind of twisted, misguided question is this and why are you asking me this question? You know, I like you but I'm tired of your line of questioning. It's completely senseless, Dude. Furthermore, I bet you can find hundreds of post where I chronicle Berry's improvement over the course of the season. I don't recall seeing even one post by you about Berry. No offense, just telling it like it is, Dude. |
Wow ok. I said I wouldn't trade berry for thomas. You quote it and disagree. Then you agree with milk man that he's better for us. So would you trade them? If not why call out my post? And ftr I don't believe a center is worth the third. But il remember that come draft time
Quote:
|
Blount at #14? UFA to #14 overall? I don't think so. I know he is playing well but lets let the story be told. Chances are he sees any success he goes dumbass.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hell maybe I am completely wrong. |
Quote:
Here was my follow up post in the CP draft talking with Mecca...Again, Pat Angerer (Pronounced 'Anger') was the other Hawkeye I wanted us to draft along with Moeaki. I also said over and over that IF we were dead set on taking a OT in the first, I would take Bulaga over Okung...but that he was no better than a 10-15 pick...seems my "homerism" (as some call it) is pretty ****ing spot on when it comes to Hawkeye players. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I made the same comment about Dez Bryant in another thread. |
Quote:
I countered with information that maybe you weren't aware of to you help you understand why Gosselin chose the way he did. Pouncey has the makings of Dermotti Dawson, a perennial Pro Bowler. He's been dominant in a defensive heavy division and has been the Steelers best lineman. They're currently 9-3, BTW. Earl Thomas has 64 tackles and 5 INT's for a 6-6 division leading team and has been doing everything asked of him for their scheme. If those aren't reason enough for you to consider why they'd be highly touted, I don't know what to tell you. The purpose of a "re-draft" is to asses the current level of play by rookies and based on their level of performance, re-slot them based on that value. If you disagree, please explain why you disagree. Don't just say "This is bullshit" or "This guy's an idiot" or any other predictable, non-informed remark. And if you want to play "that game", I can tell you that while I wouldn't advocate taking a center at #3 overall, I'd certainly take Pouncey over Tyson Jackson. At the end of the day, it's about the player's performance, not where he was drafted, as evidenced by this "re-draft". |
With the way Pouncey has played, I wonder how high his brother will go.
That said, if someone took him at 3rd overall, that would be a gross misuse of draft value. |
So in all seriousness, what good does it do to Re-draft?
I mean seriously? Besides all the peter pounding from everyone, does it acutally make your dick bigger? What a waste of bandwidth and disk space on the server... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can get a perrenial pro bowl quality center in the second round or very late first (at the earliest) Nick Mangold 29th Alex Mack 21st If you spend a top three pick on a center, no matter how good, you should be ridiculed Tyson Jackson style. Ive watched the Steelers a few times this year and he is a damn good player, but not THAT good. I havent watched a lot of Florida games, I wonder if his brother has the skill set to be a center and not just a guard...I would be fine (if not happy even) if he fell to our pick in the first in the next draft and he is the guy to replace Weigman. That would give us a hella nice, and young, OL. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.