ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Matt Barkley To Announce 2012 NFL Draft Decision At 4 P.M. Press Conference (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=254086)

BigMeatballDave 12-22-2011 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8229663)
Ryan Tannehill in the 1st.

Stupid

Mr_Tomahawk 12-22-2011 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8229673)
Stupid

Tyson Jackson

BigMeatballDave 12-22-2011 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8229682)
Tyson Jackson

Not sure what that had to do with anything.

Tannehill in the 1st is a reach.

Mr_Tomahawk 12-22-2011 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8229711)
Not sure what that had to do with anything.

Tannehill in the 1st is a reach.

Tyson Jackson

BigMeatballDave 12-22-2011 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8229731)
Tyson Jackson

Turd herder

rico 12-23-2011 12:03 AM

At this point, who would you rather have? Tyson Jackson or Mark Sanchez? (not implying that Tyson was a good pick by any means....but having Sanchez as your projected QBOTF would be frustrating as hell)... but still, Sanchez > Cassel. If they went to college at the same time.... I wonder who would have started????

I've watched a lot of Barkley. I'm not impressed. It's just more USC hype. Sanchez, Cassel, Leinhart...... he will end up fitting in with them. And via interviews, he seems very baggadoucheous to me.

Next year's draft class has to offer something better than him. Look at the strides RG3 made this year... coming into the season he was barely cracking some analysts top 10 lists.

Bump 12-23-2011 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8228949)
Whats the point? With the new salary cap, the top 5 players made about the same amount of money. And since he's a QB, he'd likely get more money that the other non-QBs drafted ahead of him.

I don't see why he'd want to go back just to be drafted #1 overall. Don't see the benefit.

cause everybody remembers the #1 pick, even if you bust, you won't be forgotten.

Bump 12-23-2011 12:05 AM

Pioli better ****ing trade up to get RG3 God Damnit. There is zero chance he will be there when we pick now.

rico 12-23-2011 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 8229891)
Pioli better ****ing trade up to get RG3 God Damnit. There is zero chance he will be there when we pick now.

I would MUCH rather have RG3 than Iran Barkley.

Bump 12-23-2011 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricoswaff (Post 8229896)
I would MUCH rather have RG3 than Iran Barkley.

hell ya, it just means that another team is gonna take RG3 that probably woulda taken Barkley. I want RG3 bad, he's gonna be God-like.

BigMeatballDave 12-23-2011 02:24 AM

The bust factor is probably a tad higher for RG3.

NJChiefsFan 12-23-2011 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8229731)
Tyson Jackson

What does that even mean? A bad pick means any other bad pick is something we should do? I really don't understand how Tyson Jackson has anything to do with Tannenhil being a bad first round pick.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricoswaff (Post 8229887)
At this point, who would you rather have? Tyson Jackson or Mark Sanchez? (not implying that Tyson was a good pick by any means....but having Sanchez as your projected QBOTF would be frustrating as hell)... but still, Sanchez > Cassel. .

As you say, the difference is that we would be stuck suffering through Sanchez pains for 2 more years before dumping him. Although since Pioli may still have rocks in his head, we may be stuck with that situation anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 8229891)
Pioli better ****ing trade up to get RG3 God Damnit. There is zero chance he will be there when we pick now.

I don't think it was realistic to expect to see him anyway. There are 5 teams ahead of us that possibly want a QB. Even with Barlkey we were never going to see RG3.

Dexter Manley 12-23-2011 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 8229891)
Pioli better ****ing trade up to get RG3 God Damnit. There is zero chance he will be there when we pick now.

The potential bidding war for trading up for a QB among the dozen plus NFL teams in need of QB upgrade could produce silliness beyond what was possible when the top picks got twice what they are now getting $$$$ in contract.

There are some good QB prospects this year. None is in the Elway/Manning class.

The whole concept that "whatever rookie QB we get will be our savior" has a historically high probability of ending up like Tampa Bay with Steve Young... and then Vinnie... and then Dilfer...

htismaqe 12-23-2011 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8229981)
The bust factor is probably a tad higher for RG3.

Barkley plays at USC. His "bust" potential is off the charts.

Bump 12-23-2011 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobbie (Post 8230036)
The potential bidding war for trading up for a QB among the dozen plus NFL teams in need of QB upgrade could produce silliness beyond what was possible when the top picks got twice what they are now getting $$$$ in contract.

There are some good QB prospects this year. None is in the Elway/Manning class.

The whole concept that "whatever rookie QB we get will be our savior" has a historically high probability of ending up like Tampa Bay with Steve Young... and then Vinnie... and then Dilfer...

I'll take the Steve Young option.

But Luck is the best prospect to come out since Manning, he's in that class.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.