ChiefsPlanet - Football Brady v. NFL: No Settlement; Judge Berman to Decide

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Brady v. NFL: No Settlement; Judge Berman to Decide (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=294278)

Quote:

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea (Post 11697748)

Yeah, that's why Pat's fans defended Aaron Hernandez to the death.LMAO

lol. Wow.

Berman is going to be a big pussy and let Brady off the hook. He won't have the guts to stand by the legalities of the case. Bunch of bullshit. Every suspended player should go whine and cry to get their pay checks back.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanadaKC (Post 11697557)

Leave all the legal jargon out of it, and all the "Free Brady" idiots…and Brady is guilty as sin. Case closed.

I almost be willing to bet that the Judge doesn't give a single shit whether Brady is guilty or not.

Doesn't care about the negotiated legal document(CBA) that the union is trying to cheat around either.

When the NFL and NFLPA negotiated the CBA you can be assured that the NFLPA got something in return for the commissioners extra power. Now the union is trying to use the legal system to take the power back without exchanging anything for it.

Legal system just pisses me off lately, judges getting involved instead of just following the law and making a judgement. douchebags.

Defending the Pats to death on a Chief board ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL

The Supreme Court already laid down the law in these matters 15 years ago. Now we get to watch Berman be a complete idiot and ignore that. Brady is the biggest whiny bitch in sports. Effing stupid.

I still think this should happen to all Pats fans on this board.

http://i.imgur.com/YQy5Z5s.gif

Bob McNair probably just got himself taken off Kraft's Christmas card list.

http://blog.chron.com/ultimatetexans...is-cell-phone/

Quote:

Texans owner Bob McNair didn’t mince words when asked about the ongoing Deflategate saga involving suspended New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady.

In an interview with SportsRadio 610 on Tuesday following an annual team luncheon, McNair was critical of how the situation has dragged out.

“I think (the league) could have handled it better,” McNair said. “The Patriots could have handled it better, Brady could have handled it better. What escalated the whole thing is, Brady and the Patriots were going to cooperate fully, and then when it came down to it, they didn’t. That’s what really upset the commissioner.”

Brady and the NFL are now embroiled in a messy legal battle where a federal judge is urging them to reach a settlement. No agreement has been reached, though.

McNair said he doesn’t think Texans star defensive end J.J. Watt would have destroyed his cell phone if he’d been in a similar situation, as Brady suspiciously did, rather than cooperate fully with NFL investigators.

“I think if it was J.J. Watt, I think he would have been cooperative and it wouldn’t be a question,” McNair said. “I don’t think J.J. would destroy his cell phone. The whole idea is that we want to make sure we have a competitive playing field that’s level for everybody. We don’t want people breaking the rules.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 11699358)

The Supreme Court already laid down the law in these matters 15 years ago. Now we get to watch Berman be a complete idiot and ignore that. Brady is the biggest whiny bitch in sports. Effing stupid.

Nothing better than patriot haters that whine lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 11698098)

Actually, FWIW, the real reason I came here -- over 12 years ago now -- was to engage in debates in what now is the DC forum. Back then it wasn't really a separate forum. I didn't love or hate the Chiefs, and this seemed like a lively board, and the political viewpoints were very different from mine, so here I landed.

I note that I am much less liberal than I was then, and also less active in the DC Forum. But I have no problem arguing with alot of people, and holding a minority position. That's really why I came here in the first place.

Much to your dismay, apparently.

But you're a n00b, so who cares about you. :p

:hmmm:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 11697730)

It's entirely possible Brady said "as low as possible" or whatever, without saying "hey, needle the balls after the refs clear them".

In one scenario (where Brady knows) it's plausible deniability. In another (where he doesn't know), the ball boys go one step too far getting him what they think he wants. I think either possibility is very possible.

But everyone assumes the first, so Brady's reputation is trashed, even though he may honestly have never known or thought that they would needle the balls AFTER the refs approved them.

Whatever. I'm done arguing his innocence, or lack thereof. Nobody is changing their mind on that at this point.

This argument would be more convincing if Tom Brady hadn't initially acted like he had no idea what it means to deflate a football. It was exactly like Hillary Clinton's response when asked if she had wiped her email server. She said "You mean with a cloth?"

:facepalm:

Will be a total travesty if the suspension is reduced. Slap in the face to every NFL fan outside of that shithole.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11701785)

Will be a total travesty if the suspension is reduced. Slap in the face to every NFL fan outside of that shithole.

I'll be shocked if he gets more than a 1 game suspension because Pat's

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11701785)

Will be a total travesty if the suspension is reduced. Slap in the face to every NFL fan outside of that shithole.

Why? You like people convicted without any proof of guilt? Is that your idea?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 11701876)

Why? You like people convicted without any proof of guilt? Is that your idea?

Pretty much. There is a 76 page thread here where a lot of people would look like blow hard dumbasses on this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 11701876)

Why? You like people convicted without any proof of guilt? Is that your idea?

I don't really care either way, but come on. Let's not act like he's an innocent man sitting on death row. His employer is dissatisfied with his on duty performance and is reprimanding him for it.